中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2001年
3期
158-161
,共4页
邓大君%邓国仁%吕有勇%周静%辛慧君
鄧大君%鄧國仁%呂有勇%週靜%辛慧君
산대군%산국인%려유용%주정%신혜군
基因表达%甲基化%色谱法,高效液相
基因錶達%甲基化%色譜法,高效液相
기인표체%갑기화%색보법,고효액상
目的 建立一种新型的CpG岛胞嘧啶甲基化快速检测方法。方法 用亚硫酸氢钠处理DNA,再用链特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)对错配修复基因hMLH1启动子含CpG位点的靶序列进行扩增;利用变性高效液相色谱法(DHPLC)在部分变性温度下测定靶序列的保留时间,并与亚硫酸氢钠-酶切法测定结果进行比较。结果 用DHPLC对结肠癌细胞株RKO和胃癌细胞株PACM82的hMLH1启动子进行测定,发现RKO细胞PCR产物的保留时间明显长于PACM82细胞PCR产物的保留时间(6.7 min比6.2 min)。RKO细胞PCR产物保留时间的延长是亚硫酸氢钠处理后的模板中胞嘧啶和鸟嘌呤含量较PACM82高所致。从此结果分析,可以判断出RKO的hMLH1启动子已甲基化,而PACM82细胞未甲基化。此结果与酶切法结果完全一致。结论 新方法可以快速检测CpG岛胞嘧啶甲基化。
目的 建立一種新型的CpG島胞嘧啶甲基化快速檢測方法。方法 用亞硫痠氫鈉處理DNA,再用鏈特異性聚閤酶鏈反應(PCR)對錯配脩複基因hMLH1啟動子含CpG位點的靶序列進行擴增;利用變性高效液相色譜法(DHPLC)在部分變性溫度下測定靶序列的保留時間,併與亞硫痠氫鈉-酶切法測定結果進行比較。結果 用DHPLC對結腸癌細胞株RKO和胃癌細胞株PACM82的hMLH1啟動子進行測定,髮現RKO細胞PCR產物的保留時間明顯長于PACM82細胞PCR產物的保留時間(6.7 min比6.2 min)。RKO細胞PCR產物保留時間的延長是亞硫痠氫鈉處理後的模闆中胞嘧啶和鳥嘌呤含量較PACM82高所緻。從此結果分析,可以判斷齣RKO的hMLH1啟動子已甲基化,而PACM82細胞未甲基化。此結果與酶切法結果完全一緻。結論 新方法可以快速檢測CpG島胞嘧啶甲基化。
목적 건립일충신형적CpG도포밀정갑기화쾌속검측방법。방법 용아류산경납처리DNA,재용련특이성취합매련반응(PCR)대착배수복기인hMLH1계동자함CpG위점적파서렬진행확증;이용변성고효액상색보법(DHPLC)재부분변성온도하측정파서렬적보류시간,병여아류산경납-매절법측정결과진행비교。결과 용DHPLC대결장암세포주RKO화위암세포주PACM82적hMLH1계동자진행측정,발현RKO세포PCR산물적보류시간명현장우PACM82세포PCR산물적보류시간(6.7 min비6.2 min)。RKO세포PCR산물보류시간적연장시아류산경납처리후적모판중포밀정화조표령함량교PACM82고소치。종차결과분석,가이판단출RKO적hMLH1계동자이갑기화,이PACM82세포미갑기화。차결과여매절법결과완전일치。결론 신방법가이쾌속검측CpG도포밀정갑기화。
Objective To establish a new approach for analyzing methylation circumventing the limitations of the existing methods. Methods A region containing CpG sites in mismatch repair gene hMLH1 promoter was amplified by strand-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after sodium bisulfite treatment. The retention time of the PCR product at partially denaturing temperature was determined by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). The methylation status obtained by DHPLC was proved by comparing it with that from sodium bisulfite-restriction enzyme digestion. Results Methylation of hMLH1 promoter from a colorectal cancer cell line RKO and a gastric cancer cell line PACM82 was analyzed by DHPLC. The retention time of the PCR product from RKO was obviously longer than that from PACM82 (6.7 min vs. 6.2 min). Thus, it was concluded that the hMLH1 promoter from RKO was methylated, while that from PACM82 was not, since the longer retaining time of RKO was due to the higher C/G content after sodium bisulfite treatment. The results from DHPLC were consistent with those from sodium bisulfite-restriction enzyme digestion. Conclusion DHPLC method is a rapid and reliable approach for analyzing methylation in CpG island of the sequence of interest.