中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2011年
36期
3-4
,共2页
人工气道湿化%微量注射泵%持续氧气驱动雾化
人工氣道濕化%微量註射泵%持續氧氣驅動霧化
인공기도습화%미량주사빙%지속양기구동무화
Humidifying of atificial airway%Trace injection pump%Continuous oxygen atomization
目的 通过对两种人工气道湿化方法的比较,探索最佳气道湿化途径.方法 选择2010年6月至2011年6月我科建立人工气道患者124例,随机分为治疗组64例和对照组60例.对照组采用微量注射泵持续气道湿化,治疗组采用氧气驱动雾化罐持续雾化,对2组湿化效果、患者对湿化耐受率、气道湿化并发症发生情况、护理成本支出4项指标进行比较.结果 与对照组相比,治疗组持续雾化效果好,患者易耐受,气道湿化并发症少且成本支出少.结论 氧气驱动雾化罐持续雾化是一种安全、有效、低成本、易被患者接受的湿化方法,值得推广.
目的 通過對兩種人工氣道濕化方法的比較,探索最佳氣道濕化途徑.方法 選擇2010年6月至2011年6月我科建立人工氣道患者124例,隨機分為治療組64例和對照組60例.對照組採用微量註射泵持續氣道濕化,治療組採用氧氣驅動霧化罐持續霧化,對2組濕化效果、患者對濕化耐受率、氣道濕化併髮癥髮生情況、護理成本支齣4項指標進行比較.結果 與對照組相比,治療組持續霧化效果好,患者易耐受,氣道濕化併髮癥少且成本支齣少.結論 氧氣驅動霧化罐持續霧化是一種安全、有效、低成本、易被患者接受的濕化方法,值得推廣.
목적 통과대량충인공기도습화방법적비교,탐색최가기도습화도경.방법 선택2010년6월지2011년6월아과건립인공기도환자124례,수궤분위치료조64례화대조조60례.대조조채용미량주사빙지속기도습화,치료조채용양기구동무화관지속무화,대2조습화효과、환자대습화내수솔、기도습화병발증발생정황、호리성본지출4항지표진행비교.결과 여대조조상비,치료조지속무화효과호,환자역내수,기도습화병발증소차성본지출소.결론 양기구동무화관지속무화시일충안전、유효、저성본、역피환자접수적습화방법,치득추엄.
Objective To explore the best humidifying methods of artificial airway by comparison of different humidifying approaches.Methods 124 patients were divided into the control group (60 cases) and the treatment group (64 cases).Two methods,continuous airway humidifying by the trace injection pump and continuous airway humidifying by oxygen atomization were adopted.The humidifying effect,tolerance rate of patients,the airway complications and nursing cost were compared between the two groups.Results The method of continuous airway humidifying by oxygen atomization had better effect,was easy to be tolerated,less complications and less cost.Conclusions Continuous airway humidifying by oxygen atomization is a safe,effective,low-cost method,it is easy to be tolerated by patients and is worthy of being popularized.
