CAJ | 학술논문

后TRIPs时代，我国知识产权保护水平已与世界先进国家标准接轨；但我国自主创新比例却相当低，知识产权已经成为国外知识产权权利人进人中国后封闭市场、排挤竞争对手的工具。一国的知识产权反垄断立法价值取向应当与其具体的国内外经济政治环境相适应，反映其“本土性”、“时代性”的特点。作为拥有知识霸权的发达国家，已放松了对知识产权反垄断的规制，持有利于知识产权人的立场；他们的立场与技术落后的发展中国家截然不同。我国在知识产权反垄断立法过程中，当务之急不是去寻求国外的立法技术移植；而是从战略高度确定知识产权反垄断的立法价值取向，即以社会公益为本位，强化反垄断规制。
후TRIPs시대，아국지식산권보호수평이여세계선진국가표준접궤；단아국자주창신비례각상당저，지식산권이경성위국외지식산권권리인진인중국후봉폐시장、배제경쟁대수적공구。일국적지식산권반롱단입법개치취향응당여기구체적국내외경제정치배경상괄응，반영기“본토성”、“시대성”적특점。작위옹유지식패권적발체국가，이방송료대지식산권반롱단적규제，지유리우지식산권인적립장；타문적립장여기술락후적발전중국가절연불동。아국재지식산권반롱단입법과정중，당무지급불시거심구국외적입법기술이식；이시종전략고도학정지식산권반롱단적입법개치취향，즉이사회공익위본위，강화반롱단규제。
In post-TRIPs era, China＇s IP protection level has reached the world advanced country＇s standard. While low proportion in self-innovation of China, IP has become a tool of foreign IP rights holders to close market and exclude competitors while they entering Chinese market. The choice of legislation value of IP antitrust law should be in accordance with a country＇s domestic and international economic and political conditions, reflecting its own native characteristics and the nature of time. As IP giants, whose positions are totally different from those of developing countries, advanced countries have shifted their stand to protect IP rights holders and loosed their antitrust regulations. In China＇s IP antitrust legislation, the primary thing is not to transplant foreign legislation of IP antitrust law but confirm the legislation purpose of China＇s IP antitrust law, which should be on the interests of public benefit and with strong antitrust regulations.