中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2010年
5期
510-512
,共3页
乔毅娟%星一%段佳丽%白承续%潘勇平%崔永强%孔俊花
喬毅娟%星一%段佳麗%白承續%潘勇平%崔永彊%孔俊花
교의연%성일%단가려%백승속%반용평%최영강%공준화
校园躯体暴力%中学生%影响因素
校園軀體暴力%中學生%影響因素
교완구체폭력%중학생%영향인소
Physical violence%Middle school student%Associated factors
目的 了解北京市不同性别中学生校园躯体暴力行为的流行状况及其影响因素.方法 采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法抽取北京市初一到高三学生5718名,匿名填写问卷,有效问卷5660份.采用logistic回归方法进行影响因素分析.结果 北京市中学生校园躯体暴力的报告率为14.3%,男生高于女生(男生25.2%、女生5.1%).无论男女生,学校亲密度差是校园躯体暴力发生的危险因素(男生OR=1.060、女生OR=1.065);父亲初中及以下文化程度(OR=1.653)、重组/单亲家庭(OR=1.834)、低年级(初一OR=5.291、高二OR=1.526)、学习成绩较差(OR=1.470)是男生躯体暴力发生的危险因素.家庭经济状况较好(OR=0.546)、同伴关系较好(OR=0.618)、与父亲沟通容易(OR=0.756)是男生躯体暴力发生的保护因素.与母亲沟通容易(OR=0.358)是女生躯体暴力发生的保护因素.结论 校园躯体暴力的流行状况及影响因素与性别有关,应充分考虑性别差异,从个人、家庭、学校等多方面采取干预措施,预防校园躯体暴力行为的发生.
目的 瞭解北京市不同性彆中學生校園軀體暴力行為的流行狀況及其影響因素.方法 採用多階段整群隨機抽樣方法抽取北京市初一到高三學生5718名,匿名填寫問捲,有效問捲5660份.採用logistic迴歸方法進行影響因素分析.結果 北京市中學生校園軀體暴力的報告率為14.3%,男生高于女生(男生25.2%、女生5.1%).無論男女生,學校親密度差是校園軀體暴力髮生的危險因素(男生OR=1.060、女生OR=1.065);父親初中及以下文化程度(OR=1.653)、重組/單親傢庭(OR=1.834)、低年級(初一OR=5.291、高二OR=1.526)、學習成績較差(OR=1.470)是男生軀體暴力髮生的危險因素.傢庭經濟狀況較好(OR=0.546)、同伴關繫較好(OR=0.618)、與父親溝通容易(OR=0.756)是男生軀體暴力髮生的保護因素.與母親溝通容易(OR=0.358)是女生軀體暴力髮生的保護因素.結論 校園軀體暴力的流行狀況及影響因素與性彆有關,應充分攷慮性彆差異,從箇人、傢庭、學校等多方麵採取榦預措施,預防校園軀體暴力行為的髮生.
목적 료해북경시불동성별중학생교완구체폭역행위적류행상황급기영향인소.방법 채용다계단정군수궤추양방법추취북경시초일도고삼학생5718명,닉명전사문권,유효문권5660빈.채용logistic회귀방법진행영향인소분석.결과 북경시중학생교완구체폭력적보고솔위14.3%,남생고우녀생(남생25.2%、녀생5.1%).무론남녀생,학교친밀도차시교완구체폭력발생적위험인소(남생OR=1.060、녀생OR=1.065);부친초중급이하문화정도(OR=1.653)、중조/단친가정(OR=1.834)、저년급(초일OR=5.291、고이OR=1.526)、학습성적교차(OR=1.470)시남생구체폭력발생적위험인소.가정경제상황교호(OR=0.546)、동반관계교호(OR=0.618)、여부친구통용역(OR=0.756)시남생구체폭력발생적보호인소.여모친구통용역(OR=0.358)시녀생구체폭력발생적보호인소.결론 교완구체폭력적류행상황급영향인소여성별유관,응충분고필성별차이,종개인、가정、학교등다방면채취간예조시,예방교완구체폭역행위적발생.
Objective To described the prevalence of school physical violence behaviors and to explore its associated factors among middle school students in Beijing. Methods In 2009, a randomly selected cross- sectional survey was conducted among 5718 students in grades 7 to 12 in Beijing. A self-report anonymous questionnaire involving physical violence at school and sociodemographic variables, such as sex, grades, family economic status and family structure, peer relationships, and communication with their parents etc. were completed by students themselves.Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physical violence and sociodemographic variables. Results Among the students, 14.3% reported that they had had physical violence behavior in school during the past 12 months. Male students had been more likely to have physical violence behaviors than female students (Male 25.2%, Female 5.1% ). For both male and female students, poor school cohesion were the risk factors of physical violence behaviors (Male OR=1.060, Female OR=1.065). For male students, factors as father' s lower education level (OR=1.653 ), remarried/single-parent families ( OR = 1.834 ), low-grade ( grade 7 OR = 5.291; grade 11 OR =1.526) , poor school performance (OR=1.470) etc were the risk factors of physical violence behaviors; while better-off family economic status (OR=0.546), good peer relationships (OR=0.618) , and easy to communicate with the father (OR=0.756) were the protective factors of physical violence behaviors. For female students, easy to communicate with her mother (OR = 0.358)were the protective factors of physical violence behaviors. Conclusion For male and female students, the prevalence of school physical violence and its related factors were different. Actions on prevention against physical violence behaviors should be fully considered, including factors as gender, personal characteristics, family, school and peers etc.