中国临床实用医学
中國臨床實用醫學
중국림상실용의학
CHINA CLINICAL PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2009年
3期
18-20
,共3页
魏巍%黄玮%朱福音%韩玉英
魏巍%黃瑋%硃福音%韓玉英
위외%황위%주복음%한옥영
肿瘤%免疫学%胸腔积液
腫瘤%免疫學%胸腔積液
종류%면역학%흉강적액
Tumor%Immunology%Pleural effusion
目的对比病理学及细胞学检查,观察胸腔积液中CEA、CA199、CA125水平,探讨三种肿瘤标志物对恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值.方法人选36例良性胸腔积液患者及29例恶性胸腔积液患者,采用全自动化学发光法检测所有人选人群胸腔积液中CEA、CA199、CA125水平,并统计常用筛检试验指标,评价其鉴别诊断价值.结果恶性胸腔积液组CEA、CA125、CA199水平(117.83±139.43)μg/L、(51.26±22071)U/ml、(138.29±152.31)U/ml显著高于良性胸腔积液组(2.89±7.21)μg/L、(17.12±9.23)U/ml、(23.36±37.84)u/ml(P<O.05);筛检结果显示单纯检测三种标志物敏感性均较低,其中CEA敏感度58.6%为最高,CA199特异度94.4%为最高,三种标志物联合检测敏感度高达89.7%,P<0.01,特异度为97.2%;在诊断一致性方面三种标志物联合检测Kappa值0.875为最高.结论单独检测CEA、CA125、CA199其CEA敏感性较高,CA199特异性较高;联合检测CEA、CA125、CA199其敏感性可产生最大叠加效应,高对恶性胸腔积液诊断效度,可作为胸腔积液良恶性鉴别诊断的辅助指标.
目的對比病理學及細胞學檢查,觀察胸腔積液中CEA、CA199、CA125水平,探討三種腫瘤標誌物對噁性胸腔積液的鑒彆診斷價值.方法人選36例良性胸腔積液患者及29例噁性胸腔積液患者,採用全自動化學髮光法檢測所有人選人群胸腔積液中CEA、CA199、CA125水平,併統計常用篩檢試驗指標,評價其鑒彆診斷價值.結果噁性胸腔積液組CEA、CA125、CA199水平(117.83±139.43)μg/L、(51.26±22071)U/ml、(138.29±152.31)U/ml顯著高于良性胸腔積液組(2.89±7.21)μg/L、(17.12±9.23)U/ml、(23.36±37.84)u/ml(P<O.05);篩檢結果顯示單純檢測三種標誌物敏感性均較低,其中CEA敏感度58.6%為最高,CA199特異度94.4%為最高,三種標誌物聯閤檢測敏感度高達89.7%,P<0.01,特異度為97.2%;在診斷一緻性方麵三種標誌物聯閤檢測Kappa值0.875為最高.結論單獨檢測CEA、CA125、CA199其CEA敏感性較高,CA199特異性較高;聯閤檢測CEA、CA125、CA199其敏感性可產生最大疊加效應,高對噁性胸腔積液診斷效度,可作為胸腔積液良噁性鑒彆診斷的輔助指標.
목적대비병이학급세포학검사,관찰흉강적액중CEA、CA199、CA125수평,탐토삼충종류표지물대악성흉강적액적감별진단개치.방법인선36례량성흉강적액환자급29례악성흉강적액환자,채용전자동화학발광법검측소유인선인군흉강적액중CEA、CA199、CA125수평,병통계상용사검시험지표,평개기감별진단개치.결과악성흉강적액조CEA、CA125、CA199수평(117.83±139.43)μg/L、(51.26±22071)U/ml、(138.29±152.31)U/ml현저고우량성흉강적액조(2.89±7.21)μg/L、(17.12±9.23)U/ml、(23.36±37.84)u/ml(P<O.05);사검결과현시단순검측삼충표지물민감성균교저,기중CEA민감도58.6%위최고,CA199특이도94.4%위최고,삼충표지물연합검측민감도고체89.7%,P<0.01,특이도위97.2%;재진단일치성방면삼충표지물연합검측Kappa치0.875위최고.결론단독검측CEA、CA125、CA199기CEA민감성교고,CA199특이성교고;연합검측CEA、CA125、CA199기민감성가산생최대첩가효응,고대악성흉강적액진단효도,가작위흉강적액량악성감별진단적보조지표.
Objective To compare the pathology and cytology, pleural effusion observed in the CEA and CA199, CA125 levels to explore three types of tumor markers for malignant pleural effusion in the differenti-al diagnosis. Methods The selected 36 cases of patients with benign pleural effusion and 29 cases of patients with malignant pleural effusion. The use of fully automated chemiluminescence detection of all people selected in the pleural effusion CEA and CA199, CA125 levels and screening tests commonly used statistical indicators to e-valuate their differential diagnosis. Results malignant pleural effusion group CEA, CA125, CA199 level (117.83±139.43)μg/L, (51.26±22.71 U/ml), (138.29±152.31) U/ml were significantly higher than benign pleural effusion group (2.89±7.21)μg/L, (17.12±9.23) U/ml, (23.36±37.84)U/ml,(P<0.05). Screening results showed that a simple detection sensitivity of the three markers were lower, with sensitivity of the CEA 58.6 percent for the highest CA199 specificity of 94.4% percent for the highest of the three markers combined detection sensi-tivity as high as 89.7% P<0.01,specificity 97.2%. Consistency in the diagnosis of the three markers combined detection of Kappa as the supreme value of 0. 875. Conclusion Detection of a separate CEA, CA125, CA199 sen-sitivity of the CEA high CA199 more specific joint detection of CEA,CA125 ,CA199 may have a sensitivity of the effect of superimposed significantly improve the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion validity. Can be used as be-nign and malignant pleural effusion differential diagnosis of secondary indicators.