中国组织工程研究与临床康复
中國組織工程研究與臨床康複
중국조직공정연구여림상강복
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL REHABILITATIVE TISSUE ENGINEERING RESEARCH
2010年
47期
8904-8908
,共5页
杨军英%张盛炎%陈珊%冯磊
楊軍英%張盛炎%陳珊%馮磊
양군영%장성염%진산%풍뢰
弱光启动%可压型复合树脂%边缘裂隙%显微硬度%生物材料
弱光啟動%可壓型複閤樹脂%邊緣裂隙%顯微硬度%生物材料
약광계동%가압형복합수지%변연렬극%현미경도%생물재료
背景:临床应用复合树脂进行牙科修复,主要依赖于其合适的固化与较小的体积收缩,而这与光固化方法密切相关.目的:探讨两种光固化方法对不同种类可压型后牙树脂显微材料的硬度和边缘密合性的影响.方法:EcuShere-Carat,3M Filtek P60,Tetric Ceram HB三种树脂通过弱光启动光固化模式和固化光强度维持不变的标准模式进行卤素固化灯光固化,采用扫描电镜测量树脂样本与充填容器的边缘裂隙宽度评价边缘密合性,使用维氏硬度计来测量各样本顶部和底部表面的硬度.结果与结论:Filtek P60和Tetric Ceram HB采用弱光启动光固化方式的边缘裂隙宽度小于采用标准的光固化模式(t=5.78,P < 0.05;t=5.64,P < 0.05).但是对于Ecusphere- Carat,两种光固化方式效果接近(t=1.62,P > 0.05).不同树脂的顶部树脂表面硬度均大于底部树脂表面硬度(P < 0.05).弱光启动固化后,树脂顶部表面硬度较传统光固化低(P < 0.05).但两种光固化方式对于不同树脂底部表面硬度没有影响(P > 0.05).说明与常规光固化模式相比,弱光启动固化能有效降低部分可压型树脂的聚合收缩,树脂的表面硬度会有所下降.
揹景:臨床應用複閤樹脂進行牙科脩複,主要依賴于其閤適的固化與較小的體積收縮,而這與光固化方法密切相關.目的:探討兩種光固化方法對不同種類可壓型後牙樹脂顯微材料的硬度和邊緣密閤性的影響.方法:EcuShere-Carat,3M Filtek P60,Tetric Ceram HB三種樹脂通過弱光啟動光固化模式和固化光彊度維持不變的標準模式進行滷素固化燈光固化,採用掃描電鏡測量樹脂樣本與充填容器的邊緣裂隙寬度評價邊緣密閤性,使用維氏硬度計來測量各樣本頂部和底部錶麵的硬度.結果與結論:Filtek P60和Tetric Ceram HB採用弱光啟動光固化方式的邊緣裂隙寬度小于採用標準的光固化模式(t=5.78,P < 0.05;t=5.64,P < 0.05).但是對于Ecusphere- Carat,兩種光固化方式效果接近(t=1.62,P > 0.05).不同樹脂的頂部樹脂錶麵硬度均大于底部樹脂錶麵硬度(P < 0.05).弱光啟動固化後,樹脂頂部錶麵硬度較傳統光固化低(P < 0.05).但兩種光固化方式對于不同樹脂底部錶麵硬度沒有影響(P > 0.05).說明與常規光固化模式相比,弱光啟動固化能有效降低部分可壓型樹脂的聚閤收縮,樹脂的錶麵硬度會有所下降.
배경:림상응용복합수지진행아과수복,주요의뢰우기합괄적고화여교소적체적수축,이저여광고화방법밀절상관.목적:탐토량충광고화방법대불동충류가압형후아수지현미재료적경도화변연밀합성적영향.방법:EcuShere-Carat,3M Filtek P60,Tetric Ceram HB삼충수지통과약광계동광고화모식화고화광강도유지불변적표준모식진행서소고화등광고화,채용소묘전경측량수지양본여충전용기적변연렬극관도평개변연밀합성,사용유씨경도계래측량각양본정부화저부표면적경도.결과여결론:Filtek P60화Tetric Ceram HB채용약광계동광고화방식적변연렬극관도소우채용표준적광고화모식(t=5.78,P < 0.05;t=5.64,P < 0.05).단시대우Ecusphere- Carat,량충광고화방식효과접근(t=1.62,P > 0.05).불동수지적정부수지표면경도균대우저부수지표면경도(P < 0.05).약광계동고화후,수지정부표면경도교전통광고화저(P < 0.05).단량충광고화방식대우불동수지저부표면경도몰유영향(P > 0.05).설명여상규광고화모식상비,약광계동고화능유효강저부분가압형수지적취합수축,수지적표면경도회유소하강.
BACKGROUND: The use of resin-based composites is increasing in clinical practice. The success and longevity of composite-resin restorations highly depends on adequate polymerization and small polymerization shrinkage, which are closely related with light-curing modes.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of two different light-curing methods on marginal adaptation and microhardness of packable posterior composite restorations. METHODS: Specimens were made from these moulds with 3 types of packable resin-based composites: Ecusphere-Carat, 3M Filtek P60 and Tetric Ceram HB, and 2 curing modes: standard and soft-start curing mode with halogen light. The marginal adaptation was evaluated by measuring the width of margin gap between the mold and specimens with scanning electron microscope. Vickers microhardness was tested on the top and bottom surfaces of the specimens.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: For Filtek P60 and Tetric Ceram HB, soft-start curing mode showed lower values of the widths of marginal gap than that of standard mode (t=5.78, P < 0.05; t=5.64, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference with Ecusphere-Carat (t=1.62, P > 0.05). The top surface demonstrated higher microhardness values than the bottom surface in all experimental conditions (P < 0.05). The soft-start curing mode showed lower values of top surface hardness for the three resins than that of standard mode (P < 0.05). But no significant differences were found on the bottom surface hardness of the three resins between these two curing modes (P > 0.05). Compared with routine light-cured mode, the soft-start curing mode can reduce the polymerization shrinkage and surface hardness of packable resin-based composites.