CAJ | 학술논문

本文通过对供肾动脉与髂内动脉端端吻合(EEA)及与髂外动脉端侧吻合(ESA)二种方法的比较,结果显示:ESA组非常显著地缩短了手术时间(P<0.001);EEA组动脉吻合口狭窄发生率为7%,显著高于ESA组;二组正常功能移植肾血流无显著性差异;ESA组多支动脉供肾利用率为94.4%,显著高于EEA组.同时认为ESA减少体外多支动脉供肾血管重建手术,缩短冷缺血时间,减少供肾损伤.
본문통과대공신동맥여가내동맥단단문합(EEA)급여가외동맥단측문합(ESA)이충방법적비교,결과현시:ESA조비상현저지축단료수술시간(P<0.001);EEA조동맥문합구협착발생솔위7%,현저고우ESA조;이조정상공능이식신혈류무현저성차이;ESA조다지동맥공신이용솔위94.4%,현저고우EEA조.동시인위ESA감소체외다지동맥공신혈관중건수술,축단랭결혈시간,감소공신손상.
This study compared two techniques of artery anastomoses,renal artery to the external iliac artery(ESA)and to the internal iliac artery(EEA)in renal transplantation.The operation time and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis was cut down significantely in ESA group.The blood flow in grafts has no difference in two groups with normal renal function.The utilization rate of grafts with multiple arteries was higher(94.4%)in ESA group.Back bench surgery for artery repair,cold ischemia time and renal damage were reduced in ESA group.