中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2010年
19期
1300-1303
,共4页
王储%劳立峰%牛文鑫%邢泽军%邱贵兴%吴志宏
王儲%勞立峰%牛文鑫%邢澤軍%邱貴興%吳誌宏
왕저%로립봉%우문흠%형택군%구귀흥%오지굉
脊柱侧凸%放射摄影影像解释,计算机辅助%放射测量法
脊柱側凸%放射攝影影像解釋,計算機輔助%放射測量法
척주측철%방사섭영영상해석,계산궤보조%방사측량법
Scoliosis%Radiographic image interpretation,computor-assisted%Radio metry
目的 用计算机辅助软件Mimics测量数字影像学资料的Cobb角,将其同传统X线片测量方法比较,探索将其用于临床测量的可能性及其优劣势.方法 随机选择20例脊柱侧凸患者X线胶片,扫描后,由两名经验丰富的医生用Mimics进行Cobb角测量,并同样由这两名医生测量X线胶片Cobb角,各测量两次(之间间隔1周),对所得Cobb角和两次测量之间的差值进行统计分析.结果 Mimics测量和传统x线胶片测量的Cobb角之间有很好的相关性,重复测量方差分析并无统计学差异(r=0.986,P>0.10).Mimics和传统x线胶片方法的重复测量差值有显著差异(Wilcoxon 检验,Z=-2.576,P<0.05),Mimics较传统测量更为精确.不同测量者用Mimics测量Cobb角时,不影响测量的精度.结论 Mimics可用于数字影像学资料Cobb角的测量,其精度优于传统X线胶片测量.
目的 用計算機輔助軟件Mimics測量數字影像學資料的Cobb角,將其同傳統X線片測量方法比較,探索將其用于臨床測量的可能性及其優劣勢.方法 隨機選擇20例脊柱側凸患者X線膠片,掃描後,由兩名經驗豐富的醫生用Mimics進行Cobb角測量,併同樣由這兩名醫生測量X線膠片Cobb角,各測量兩次(之間間隔1週),對所得Cobb角和兩次測量之間的差值進行統計分析.結果 Mimics測量和傳統x線膠片測量的Cobb角之間有很好的相關性,重複測量方差分析併無統計學差異(r=0.986,P>0.10).Mimics和傳統x線膠片方法的重複測量差值有顯著差異(Wilcoxon 檢驗,Z=-2.576,P<0.05),Mimics較傳統測量更為精確.不同測量者用Mimics測量Cobb角時,不影響測量的精度.結論 Mimics可用于數字影像學資料Cobb角的測量,其精度優于傳統X線膠片測量.
목적 용계산궤보조연건Mimics측량수자영상학자료적Cobb각,장기동전통X선편측량방법비교,탐색장기용우림상측량적가능성급기우열세.방법 수궤선택20례척주측철환자X선효편,소묘후,유량명경험봉부적의생용Mimics진행Cobb각측량,병동양유저량명의생측량X선효편Cobb각,각측량량차(지간간격1주),대소득Cobb각화량차측량지간적차치진행통계분석.결과 Mimics측량화전통x선효편측량적Cobb각지간유흔호적상관성,중복측량방차분석병무통계학차이(r=0.986,P>0.10).Mimics화전통x선효편방법적중복측량차치유현저차이(Wilcoxon 검험,Z=-2.576,P<0.05),Mimics교전통측량경위정학.불동측량자용Mimics측량Cobb각시,불영향측량적정도.결론 Mimics가용우수자영상학자료Cobb각적측량,기정도우우전통X선효편측량.
Objective To assess Mimics as a new measurement method in Cobb angle in a comparison with traditional measurement and try to explore the advantages and disadvantages of the new method. Methods Twenty X-ray plates of scoliosis were chosen randomly. Two experienced physicians measured the Cobb angles via Mimics and traditional methods twice with an interval of 1 week.And statistical analyses of Cobb angle and difference between two measurements were carried out. Results The overall correlation was 0. 986 for Mimics and traditional measurements. ANOVA demonstrated no significant difference between these two methods. A significant difference existed between the first and second values of Cobb angle in Mimics and traditional measurements. However the absolute difference was small. Conclusion Mimics can be a new method for measuring the digital radiographs. And its precision is superior to that of the traditional measurement.