中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2012年
1期
38-41
,共4页
钟引%钟朝晖%潘建平%王应雄%刘晨煜%杨新%胡晨%蔡林利%徐亚
鐘引%鐘朝暉%潘建平%王應雄%劉晨煜%楊新%鬍晨%蔡林利%徐亞
종인%종조휘%반건평%왕응웅%류신욱%양신%호신%채림리%서아
中国%农村%儿童忽视%儿童伤害%横断面研究
中國%農村%兒童忽視%兒童傷害%橫斷麵研究
중국%농촌%인동홀시%인동상해%횡단면연구
China%Rural%Child neglect%Child maltreatment%Cross-sectional studies
目的 了解中国西部地区农村留守与非留守儿童忽视现状及影响因素.方法 采用“中国农村儿童忽视评价常模”中制定的量表和评价方法,采用分层多级整群抽样方法,于2010年12月分别在陕西省和重庆市各抽取3个区(县),再在每个区(县)抽取部分0～6岁农村儿童共1568名作为调查对象,用忽视率和忽视度描述其受忽视状况,采用logistic回归方法分析影响忽视率的影响因素.结果 在1568名调查对象中,留守与非留守儿童数分别为859和709名,总的忽视率为29.78％ (467/1568),忽视度为48.51±6.49.留守儿童与非留守儿童的忽视率分别为34.34％(295/859)、24.26％( 172/709)(P＜0.05),忽视度分别为49.59±6.54、47.19±6.18(P＜0.05).0～2岁组留守儿童与非留守儿童忽视度分别为48.59±6.33、45.78 ±5.94,3～6岁组分别为50.43±6.60、48.25±6.16；男童组留守儿童与非留守儿童忽视度分别为49.83±6.67、47.36±6.28,女童组分别为49.32±6.38、47.01±6.08(P值均＜0.05).0～2岁组留守儿童与非留守儿童忽视率为39.33％(153/389)、18.54％(56/302)；男童组留守儿童与非留守儿童忽视率为34.91％(162/464)、25.13％(94/374),女童组分别为33.67％ (133/395)、23.28％(78/335)(P值均＜0.05).留守儿童中父亲文化程度低、儿童与母亲关系疏远者更容易受到忽视(OR值分别为1.29、1.55,P值均＜0.05),非留守儿童中父亲职业为务农或外出务工、父母之间关系不好者更容易受到忽视(OR值分别为0.85、1.92,P值均＜0.05).结论 西部地区农村儿童忽视状况较为严重,留守儿童的忽视率和忽视度均高于非留守儿童,且两组儿童忽视率的影响因素各有不同.
目的 瞭解中國西部地區農村留守與非留守兒童忽視現狀及影響因素.方法 採用“中國農村兒童忽視評價常模”中製定的量錶和評價方法,採用分層多級整群抽樣方法,于2010年12月分彆在陝西省和重慶市各抽取3箇區(縣),再在每箇區(縣)抽取部分0～6歲農村兒童共1568名作為調查對象,用忽視率和忽視度描述其受忽視狀況,採用logistic迴歸方法分析影響忽視率的影響因素.結果 在1568名調查對象中,留守與非留守兒童數分彆為859和709名,總的忽視率為29.78％ (467/1568),忽視度為48.51±6.49.留守兒童與非留守兒童的忽視率分彆為34.34％(295/859)、24.26％( 172/709)(P＜0.05),忽視度分彆為49.59±6.54、47.19±6.18(P＜0.05).0～2歲組留守兒童與非留守兒童忽視度分彆為48.59±6.33、45.78 ±5.94,3～6歲組分彆為50.43±6.60、48.25±6.16；男童組留守兒童與非留守兒童忽視度分彆為49.83±6.67、47.36±6.28,女童組分彆為49.32±6.38、47.01±6.08(P值均＜0.05).0～2歲組留守兒童與非留守兒童忽視率為39.33％(153/389)、18.54％(56/302)；男童組留守兒童與非留守兒童忽視率為34.91％(162/464)、25.13％(94/374),女童組分彆為33.67％ (133/395)、23.28％(78/335)(P值均＜0.05).留守兒童中父親文化程度低、兒童與母親關繫疏遠者更容易受到忽視(OR值分彆為1.29、1.55,P值均＜0.05),非留守兒童中父親職業為務農或外齣務工、父母之間關繫不好者更容易受到忽視(OR值分彆為0.85、1.92,P值均＜0.05).結論 西部地區農村兒童忽視狀況較為嚴重,留守兒童的忽視率和忽視度均高于非留守兒童,且兩組兒童忽視率的影響因素各有不同.
목적 료해중국서부지구농촌류수여비류수인동홀시현상급영향인소.방법 채용“중국농촌인동홀시평개상모”중제정적량표화평개방법,채용분층다급정군추양방법,우2010년12월분별재합서성화중경시각추취3개구(현),재재매개구(현)추취부분0～6세농촌인동공1568명작위조사대상,용홀시솔화홀시도묘술기수홀시상황,채용logistic회귀방법분석영향홀시솔적영향인소.결과 재1568명조사대상중,류수여비류수인동수분별위859화709명,총적홀시솔위29.78％ (467/1568),홀시도위48.51±6.49.류수인동여비류수인동적홀시솔분별위34.34％(295/859)、24.26％( 172/709)(P＜0.05),홀시도분별위49.59±6.54、47.19±6.18(P＜0.05).0～2세조류수인동여비류수인동홀시도분별위48.59±6.33、45.78 ±5.94,3～6세조분별위50.43±6.60、48.25±6.16；남동조류수인동여비류수인동홀시도분별위49.83±6.67、47.36±6.28,녀동조분별위49.32±6.38、47.01±6.08(P치균＜0.05).0～2세조류수인동여비류수인동홀시솔위39.33％(153/389)、18.54％(56/302)；남동조류수인동여비류수인동홀시솔위34.91％(162/464)、25.13％(94/374),녀동조분별위33.67％ (133/395)、23.28％(78/335)(P치균＜0.05).류수인동중부친문화정도저、인동여모친관계소원자경용역수도홀시(OR치분별위1.29、1.55,P치균＜0.05),비류수인동중부친직업위무농혹외출무공、부모지간관계불호자경용역수도홀시(OR치분별위0.85、1.92,P치균＜0.05).결론 서부지구농촌인동홀시상황교위엄중,류수인동적홀시솔화홀시도균고우비류수인동,차량조인동홀시솔적영향인소각유불동.
Objective To understand the children neglect situation of left-behind children ( children who do not grow up with their parents) and non-left-behind children in China's western rural and its influencing factors.Methods Scales and evaluation methods in the " Chinese rural child neglected evaluation model" were used in this study.The investigation was conducted by using multistage stratified cluster sampling method; three countries were sampled randomly in Shanxi and Chongqing in November 2010,respectively.And,in every county,children from rural area aged from zero to six were randomly selected,with neglect rate and degree to describe their neglected status,using logistic regression analysis to analyze factors affecting the neglect rate.Results Among 1568 subjects (859 left-behind and 709 livingwith-parents),the total neglect rates were 29.78％ (467/1568),and the total neglect degrees were 48.51 ±6.49; the neglect rates for left-behind ones and living-with parents ones were 34.34％ (295/859) and 24.26％ ( 172/709 ) ( P ＜ 0.05 ) ; the neglect degree were 49.59 ± 6.54 and 47.19 ± 6.18 ( P ＜ 0.05 ).The neglect degree among left-behind ones and living-with parents ones between 0 to 2 years old were 48.59 ±6.33 and 45.78 ± 5.94 ( P ＜ 0.05 ) ; in 3 to 6 years old group,which were 50.43 ± 6.60 and 48.25 ± 6.16( P ＜ 0.05 ).The degrees in boy' s group of these two kinds of children were 49.83 ± 6.67,47.36 ± 6.28( P ＜0.05 ) and girl's were 49.32 ± 6.38,47.01 ± 6.08 ( P ＜ 0.05 ).On the other side,the neglect rate of left-behind and non-left-behind children between 0 to 2 years old were 39.33％ (153/389) and 18.54％(56/302) ( P ＜ 0.05 ).The rates of boy' s group were 34.91％ ( 162/464 ) and 25.13％ ( 94/374 ) ( P ＜0.05 ),and girl's were 33.67％ ( 133/395 ) and 23.28％ ( 78/335 ) ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Results showed that if the left-behind child's father was with lower education background,and the child and his mother feel stranger to each other,which led to the conclusion there was more chance for them to be neglected( OR values were 1.29and 1.55,P ＜0.05).If the non-neglected child's father was famer or migrant worker and the relationship between the mother and father was poor,then there was more chance for them to be neglected ( OR values were 0.85 and 1.92,P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusion The situation of children neglect in the western rural regions in China is serious.Both the neglect rate and degree among left-behind children are higher than those livingwith-parents children.The influencing factors of neglect rate are different in the two groups.
