植物生态学报
植物生態學報
식물생태학보
ACTA PHYTOECOLOGICA SINICA
2010年
3期
289-297
,共9页
李娜娜%田奇卓%王树亮%谢连杰%裴艳婷%李慧
李娜娜%田奇卓%王樹亮%謝連傑%裴豔婷%李慧
리나나%전기탁%왕수량%사련걸%배염정%리혜
群体环境%播种方式%分蘖潜力%品种类型%冬小麦
群體環境%播種方式%分蘗潛力%品種類型%鼕小麥
군체배경%파충방식%분얼잠력%품충류형%동소맥
canopy microclimate%sowing methods%tillering potential%variety types%winter wheat
为探讨不同类型小麦(Triticum aestivum)品种分蘖成穗特性及对群体环境的响应,寻求合理播种方式的调控参数,在大田试验条件下,对两类品种单株稀植与不同播种方式所构成的不同群体进行了对比研究.结果表明,单株稀植时,两类品种均具有较高的分蘖潜力,中多穗型品种‘济麦20'和‘鲁麦14'单株平均成穗数为40.58和44.34个,大穗型品种‘山农8355'和‘兰考矮早八'为24.33和23.20个,成穗率存在着显著的基因型差异;进入不同播种方式的群体环境后,中多穗型品种每株平均成穗数降至3.37和3.85个,降低率分别为91.70%和91.32%,大穗型品种每株成穗1.82和1.36个.分别降低92.52%和94.14%;证明群体环境对分蘖成穗的影响比遗传因素更强烈,且大穗型品种分蘖成穗特性对群体环境的响应较中多穗型敏感.播种方式可有效地调控群体结构,条播的经济产量显著高于撒播,条播行距配置对产量的影响因品种类型而异;中多穗型行距在23.4-23.9 cm、大穗犁在16.5-16.9 cm时产量最高;撒播和窄行条播可有效地增加单位面积穗数,提高挑旗和灌浆中期群体中、上层的光截获率,而千粒重和穗粒数却随之降低.播种方式对挑旗后群体内部CO_2浓度有微弱的影响.
為探討不同類型小麥(Triticum aestivum)品種分蘗成穗特性及對群體環境的響應,尋求閤理播種方式的調控參數,在大田試驗條件下,對兩類品種單株稀植與不同播種方式所構成的不同群體進行瞭對比研究.結果錶明,單株稀植時,兩類品種均具有較高的分蘗潛力,中多穗型品種‘濟麥20'和‘魯麥14'單株平均成穗數為40.58和44.34箇,大穗型品種‘山農8355'和‘蘭攷矮早八'為24.33和23.20箇,成穗率存在著顯著的基因型差異;進入不同播種方式的群體環境後,中多穗型品種每株平均成穗數降至3.37和3.85箇,降低率分彆為91.70%和91.32%,大穗型品種每株成穗1.82和1.36箇.分彆降低92.52%和94.14%;證明群體環境對分蘗成穗的影響比遺傳因素更彊烈,且大穗型品種分蘗成穗特性對群體環境的響應較中多穗型敏感.播種方式可有效地調控群體結構,條播的經濟產量顯著高于撒播,條播行距配置對產量的影響因品種類型而異;中多穗型行距在23.4-23.9 cm、大穗犛在16.5-16.9 cm時產量最高;撒播和窄行條播可有效地增加單位麵積穗數,提高挑旂和灌漿中期群體中、上層的光截穫率,而韆粒重和穗粒數卻隨之降低.播種方式對挑旂後群體內部CO_2濃度有微弱的影響.
위탐토불동류형소맥(Triticum aestivum)품충분얼성수특성급대군체배경적향응,심구합리파충방식적조공삼수,재대전시험조건하,대량류품충단주희식여불동파충방식소구성적불동군체진행료대비연구.결과표명,단주희식시,량류품충균구유교고적분얼잠력,중다수형품충‘제맥20'화‘로맥14'단주평균성수수위40.58화44.34개,대수형품충‘산농8355'화‘란고왜조팔'위24.33화23.20개,성수솔존재착현저적기인형차이;진입불동파충방식적군체배경후,중다수형품충매주평균성수수강지3.37화3.85개,강저솔분별위91.70%화91.32%,대수형품충매주성수1.82화1.36개.분별강저92.52%화94.14%;증명군체배경대분얼성수적영향비유전인소경강렬,차대수형품충분얼성수특성대군체배경적향응교중다수형민감.파충방식가유효지조공군체결구,조파적경제산량현저고우살파,조파행거배치대산량적영향인품충류형이이;중다수형행거재23.4-23.9 cm、대수리재16.5-16.9 cm시산량최고;살파화착행조파가유효지증가단위면적수수,제고도기화관장중기군체중、상층적광절획솔,이천립중화수립수각수지강저.파충방식대도기후군체내부CO_2농도유미약적영향.
Aims Wheat (Triticum aestivum) tillering characteristics provide an important basis for controlling population dynamic structure. However, studies on maximum tillering potential and different sowing methods and row spac-ings are lacking for different varieties. Our objective was to examine the maximum tillering potential and explore proper sowing methods and row allocation to increase the yield of different tillering types.Methods The experiment was conducted on the farm of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China, using large-spike (Shannong 8355 and Lankao Aizao 8) and multiple-spike (Jimai 20 and Lumai 14) eultivars. Broad-east and seed drilling (row spacing of 30, 25, 20 and 15 cm) treatments were used in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Every treatment added dibble seeding with 30 cm plant spacing. Plot area is 8 m~2.Important findings The two types have higher tillering ability with dibble seeding, but there are significant dif-ferences in spike number and spike rate. Canopy microclimate has greater influence on the two types than do ge-netic factors. The large-spike cultivar has a higher degree of response on the colony environment than the multi-pie-spike cultivar. Canopy structure can be effectively controlled by seeding mode. Drilling makes significantly higher economic yield than broadcast seeding. The degree of response to row spacing differs among the varieties. It is suggested that a suitable combination of cultivar and row spacing could effectively increase grain yield, with the row spacing 23.4-23.9 cm for multiple-spike cultivars and 16.5-16.9 cm for large-spike cultivars. Broadcast seeding and narrow spacing drill seeding increase tillering and the canopy light interception (LI) of the upper and central portion in the booting and filling stage, but reduce the number of grains and kernel weight. After the boot-ing stage, seeding mode affects CO_2 concentration of every layer, although not significantly.