中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2001年
1期
13-15
,共3页
甘文奇%陈曙旸%陶炳根%叶明宪%文保元%阎永建%许庆忠%贾建华%冒明建%丁伟
甘文奇%陳曙旸%陶炳根%葉明憲%文保元%閻永建%許慶忠%賈建華%冒明建%丁偉
감문기%진서양%도병근%협명헌%문보원%염영건%허경충%가건화%모명건%정위
农药%中毒%危险因素
農藥%中毒%危險因素
농약%중독%위험인소
目的查明混配农药中毒的发病水平和农药中毒的危险因素。方法采用整群抽样方法,在江苏省和山东省的3个乡随机抽取25个行政村,按大约1∶1的人数比例分为研究组(12个行政村)与对照组(13个行政村)。研究组施药员使用有机磷与菊酯类的混配农药,对照组施药员使用单一有机磷农药。在观察期内喷洒过农药的施药员均为调查对象。中毒病例经高年资职业病医师讨论核实后加以确认。结果研究组2 179名施药员,中毒率为10.10‰;对照组2 615名施药员,中毒率为2.29‰,研究组中毒率高于对照组,其差异有非常显著性。调整其他中毒危险因素后,使用混配农药的中毒危险是使用单一农药的3.45倍。农药中毒的其他危险因素还有:工间吸烟或进食、喷雾器发生故障或滴漏、施药后不能尽快清洗全身、个人防护不严密、长时间施药、女性施药和喷洒棉花。结论如果单剂农药混配后毒性表现为协同或相加作用,则混配用药发生农药中毒的危险增大。应加强对施药员的健康教育和用药技术培训。
目的查明混配農藥中毒的髮病水平和農藥中毒的危險因素。方法採用整群抽樣方法,在江囌省和山東省的3箇鄉隨機抽取25箇行政村,按大約1∶1的人數比例分為研究組(12箇行政村)與對照組(13箇行政村)。研究組施藥員使用有機燐與菊酯類的混配農藥,對照組施藥員使用單一有機燐農藥。在觀察期內噴灑過農藥的施藥員均為調查對象。中毒病例經高年資職業病醫師討論覈實後加以確認。結果研究組2 179名施藥員,中毒率為10.10‰;對照組2 615名施藥員,中毒率為2.29‰,研究組中毒率高于對照組,其差異有非常顯著性。調整其他中毒危險因素後,使用混配農藥的中毒危險是使用單一農藥的3.45倍。農藥中毒的其他危險因素還有:工間吸煙或進食、噴霧器髮生故障或滴漏、施藥後不能儘快清洗全身、箇人防護不嚴密、長時間施藥、女性施藥和噴灑棉花。結論如果單劑農藥混配後毒性錶現為協同或相加作用,則混配用藥髮生農藥中毒的危險增大。應加彊對施藥員的健康教育和用藥技術培訓。
목적사명혼배농약중독적발병수평화농약중독적위험인소。방법채용정군추양방법,재강소성화산동성적3개향수궤추취25개행정촌,안대약1∶1적인수비례분위연구조(12개행정촌)여대조조(13개행정촌)。연구조시약원사용유궤린여국지류적혼배농약,대조조시약원사용단일유궤린농약。재관찰기내분쇄과농약적시약원균위조사대상。중독병례경고년자직업병의사토론핵실후가이학인。결과연구조2 179명시약원,중독솔위10.10‰;대조조2 615명시약원,중독솔위2.29‰,연구조중독솔고우대조조,기차이유비상현저성。조정기타중독위험인소후,사용혼배농약적중독위험시사용단일농약적3.45배。농약중독적기타위험인소환유:공간흡연혹진식、분무기발생고장혹적루、시약후불능진쾌청세전신、개인방호불엄밀、장시간시약、녀성시약화분쇄면화。결론여과단제농약혼배후독성표현위협동혹상가작용,칙혼배용약발생농약중독적위험증대。응가강대시약원적건강교육화용약기술배훈。
Objective To investigate the incidence of pesticide poisoning with mixed preparation and risk factors contributing to it.Methods Twenty-five administrative villages were studied in three townships of Jiangsu and Shandong Provinces with cluster sampling.The sampled villages were divided into study group (12 villages) and control group (13 villages) with approximately equal number of people each.Pesticide sprayers in the study group applied mixed preparation containing organophosphorous and dimethrin and those in the control group applied single organophosphorous preparation.All the sprayers in sampled villages were interviewed with a same questionnaire about their situation of pesticide spraying during the observation period.Cases of pesticide poisoning were ascertained by seniors physicians in occupational diseases after group discussion.Results Incidence of pesticide poisoning was higher in 2 179 sprayers of the study group (10.10‰) than that in 2 615 of the control group (2.29‰), with a highly statistically difference (χ2=12.46,P<0.01) and an risk ratio (RR) of 4.45 (95% CI=1.94~10.05) adjusted for other risk factors by logistic regression.Other risk factors for pesticide poisoning with mixed preparation were smoking or taking food during spraying, leaking or breakdown of sprayers, without washing their whole body as soon as possible after spraying, poor personal protection, spraying for a long time, spraying by women and spraying pesticide on cotton.Conclusions If toxicity of mixed preparation of single pesticide showed a synergistic or additional effect, risk of poisoning by spraying mixed preparation increased.Health education and technical training should be strengthened for pesticide sprayers.