中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2012年
7期
16-18
,共3页
朱伟玉%徐美英%范振国%陈海勤%费红霞%肖海萍
硃偉玉%徐美英%範振國%陳海勤%費紅霞%肖海萍
주위옥%서미영%범진국%진해근%비홍하%초해평
精神疾病%分级护理%量化标准
精神疾病%分級護理%量化標準
정신질병%분급호리%양화표준
Mental disease%Grading nursing%Quantitative criteria
目的 探讨3种常见精神疾病患者住院期间分级护理的量化标准.方法 简明精神病量表(N-BPRS),病情严重程度量表(SI)及躁狂量表(BRMS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)等分别在108例精神分裂症患者、躁狂症和抑郁症患者入院时及入院后进行测评,比较客观地对3种常见精神疾病患者进行分级护理的量化测评.结果 3种精神疾病患者N-BPRS量化分值如下.特级护理:精神分裂症(80.66± 1.22)分；躁狂症(80.05±15.44)分；抑郁症(76.88±9.82)分.一级护理:精神分裂症(67.47±10.18)分,躁狂症(62.91±10.19)分,抑郁症(56.63±9.52)分；二级护理:精神分裂症(44.04±8.67)分,躁狂症(39.57±9.47)分,抑郁症(37.73±7.75)分.三级护理:精神分裂症(27.97±2.19)分,躁狂症(27.89±2.28)分,抑郁症(27.45±1.31)分.每种疾病各护理级别之间量化分值比较差异有统计学意义.其他相关量表分值支持N-BPRS量表表达分值变化.结论 使用N-BPRS量表的评定分值来确定3种常见精神疾病分级护理量化标准是比较可行的选择,且高年资护士经过一定的培训后均能熟练掌握操作流程.
目的 探討3種常見精神疾病患者住院期間分級護理的量化標準.方法 簡明精神病量錶(N-BPRS),病情嚴重程度量錶(SI)及躁狂量錶(BRMS)、漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD)等分彆在108例精神分裂癥患者、躁狂癥和抑鬱癥患者入院時及入院後進行測評,比較客觀地對3種常見精神疾病患者進行分級護理的量化測評.結果 3種精神疾病患者N-BPRS量化分值如下.特級護理:精神分裂癥(80.66± 1.22)分；躁狂癥(80.05±15.44)分；抑鬱癥(76.88±9.82)分.一級護理:精神分裂癥(67.47±10.18)分,躁狂癥(62.91±10.19)分,抑鬱癥(56.63±9.52)分；二級護理:精神分裂癥(44.04±8.67)分,躁狂癥(39.57±9.47)分,抑鬱癥(37.73±7.75)分.三級護理:精神分裂癥(27.97±2.19)分,躁狂癥(27.89±2.28)分,抑鬱癥(27.45±1.31)分.每種疾病各護理級彆之間量化分值比較差異有統計學意義.其他相關量錶分值支持N-BPRS量錶錶達分值變化.結論 使用N-BPRS量錶的評定分值來確定3種常見精神疾病分級護理量化標準是比較可行的選擇,且高年資護士經過一定的培訓後均能熟練掌握操作流程.
목적 탐토3충상견정신질병환자주원기간분급호리적양화표준.방법 간명정신병량표(N-BPRS),병정엄중정도량표(SI)급조광량표(BRMS)、한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD)등분별재108례정신분렬증환자、조광증화억욱증환자입원시급입원후진행측평,비교객관지대3충상견정신질병환자진행분급호리적양화측평.결과 3충정신질병환자N-BPRS양화분치여하.특급호리:정신분렬증(80.66± 1.22)분；조광증(80.05±15.44)분；억욱증(76.88±9.82)분.일급호리:정신분렬증(67.47±10.18)분,조광증(62.91±10.19)분,억욱증(56.63±9.52)분；이급호리:정신분렬증(44.04±8.67)분,조광증(39.57±9.47)분,억욱증(37.73±7.75)분.삼급호리:정신분렬증(27.97±2.19)분,조광증(27.89±2.28)분,억욱증(27.45±1.31)분.매충질병각호리급별지간양화분치비교차이유통계학의의.기타상관량표분치지지N-BPRS량표표체분치변화.결론 사용N-BPRS량표적평정분치래학정3충상견정신질병분급호리양화표준시비교가행적선택,차고년자호사경과일정적배훈후균능숙련장악조작류정.
Objective To discuss the quantitative criteria of grading nursing of three common psychiatric diseases in psychiatric department. Methods Using SI、N-BPRS,BRMS and HAMD scales to evaluate 180 patients with schizophrenia,mania and depression upon admission and after admission.The quantitative evaluation of grading nursing of these three diseases was compared. Results For the three common mental diseases N- BPRS scale scores were as follows.Superfine nursing:schizophrenia (80.66+11.22)points; mania (80.05± 15.44)points; depression (76.88±9.82)points.Primary care:schizophrenia (67.47± 10.18)points; mania ( 62.91 ± 10.19 )points; depression ( 56.63±9.52 )points; Secondary nursing:schizophrenia ( 44.04 ±8.67 )points;mania( 39.57±9.47 )points ;depression( 37.73±7.75 )points.The three- level nursing:schizophrenia( 27.97±2.19 )points;mania(27.89±2.28)points;depression(27.45±1.31 )points. Conclusions Using evaluating scores of NBPRS scale to determine the quantitative criteria of grading nursing of three common psychiatric diseases is a feasible choice,after training,nurses of high qualification can grasp skillfully the operation process.
