国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2009年
6期
835-836
,共2页
50％葡萄糖注射液%伤口%疗效%护理
50％葡萄糖註射液%傷口%療效%護理
50％포도당주사액%상구%료효%호리
50％ Glucose%Wound%Effect%Nursing
目的 探讨50%葡萄糖注射液治疗老年难愈合伤口的临床疗效,总结护理经验.方法 选取2007年3月～2008年4月期间广东医学院附属医院老年难愈合伤口患者52例,用随机数字表法将52例患者分为实验组(26例)和对照组(26例),对照组按外科感染创面常规换药,实验组在常规换药的基础上用生理盐水清洗创面后,使用50%葡萄糖注射液浸湿纱条填塞引流伤口.每日1次,比较两组治疗有效率及平均愈合时间,进行疗效评价.结果 治疗组有效率80.8%,愈合时间(8.65 ±3.52)d,对照组有效率53.8%,愈合时间(12.81±5.12)d,治疗组在有效率和愈合时间上都明显优于对照组,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05).结论 50%葡萄糖注射液能有效促进老年难愈合伤口愈合,且配制简单、操作方便,值得推广.
目的 探討50%葡萄糖註射液治療老年難愈閤傷口的臨床療效,總結護理經驗.方法 選取2007年3月～2008年4月期間廣東醫學院附屬醫院老年難愈閤傷口患者52例,用隨機數字錶法將52例患者分為實驗組(26例)和對照組(26例),對照組按外科感染創麵常規換藥,實驗組在常規換藥的基礎上用生理鹽水清洗創麵後,使用50%葡萄糖註射液浸濕紗條填塞引流傷口.每日1次,比較兩組治療有效率及平均愈閤時間,進行療效評價.結果 治療組有效率80.8%,愈閤時間(8.65 ±3.52)d,對照組有效率53.8%,愈閤時間(12.81±5.12)d,治療組在有效率和愈閤時間上都明顯優于對照組,兩組比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05).結論 50%葡萄糖註射液能有效促進老年難愈閤傷口愈閤,且配製簡單、操作方便,值得推廣.
목적 탐토50%포도당주사액치료노년난유합상구적림상료효,총결호리경험.방법 선취2007년3월～2008년4월기간엄동의학원부속의원노년난유합상구환자52례,용수궤수자표법장52례환자분위실험조(26례)화대조조(26례),대조조안외과감염창면상규환약,실험조재상규환약적기출상용생리염수청세창면후,사용50%포도당주사액침습사조전새인류상구.매일1차,비교량조치료유효솔급평균유합시간,진행료효평개.결과 치료조유효솔80.8%,유합시간(8.65 ±3.52)d,대조조유효솔53.8%,유합시간(12.81±5.12)d,치료조재유효솔화유합시간상도명현우우대조조,량조비교유현저성차이(P<0.05).결론 50%포도당주사액능유효촉진노년난유합상구유합,차배제간단、조작방편,치득추엄.
Objective To explore the curative effect and nursing intervention of 50%GS in gerontism with hard agglut wound. Methods 52 patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, be-tween March 2007 and April 2008, were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups accord-ing to numerical table. Conventional dressing change methods were used in the control group and 50% GS was rated in the observation group. The effectual rate and healing time of the two groups were observed and com-pared. Results The effectual time in control group was (12.8±5.12) days, while (8.65±3.52) days in theobservation group, and the healing rate in the control group was 53.8% and 80.8% in the observation group. The effectual rote and healing time of patients in observation group were better than those of patients in control group, and there were significant differences between them (P<0.05) . Conclusions 50% GS is an effective and con-venient method which can accelerate the curing of hard agglut wound. Therefore, it is highly recommended and popularized.
