石油钻采工艺
石油鑽採工藝
석유찬채공예
OIL DRILLING & PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
2009年
z2期
83-86
,共4页
刘永红%何乃琴%陈永兰%周爱兰
劉永紅%何迺琴%陳永蘭%週愛蘭
류영홍%하내금%진영란%주애란
苏里格气田%试气%快速产能评价%压力恢复%井筒储集时间%压力比值
囌裏格氣田%試氣%快速產能評價%壓力恢複%井筒儲集時間%壓力比值
소리격기전%시기%쾌속산능평개%압력회복%정통저집시간%압력비치
Sulige Gasfield%gas production test%fast deliverability evaluation%wellbore storage time%pressure ratio
苏里格气田渗透率低,非均质性明显,单井产能稳定性差,常规产能评价方法不适用,需要研究一种针对该气田储层特点的简单、快速、实用的方法评价气井产能.研究发现,关井早期20 h以内的压力恢复数据,其双对数曲线显示的井筒储集时间与井的产能存在明显的对应关系;其压力比值曲线变化趋势和数值范围也与井的产能存在明显的对应关系,由此可以大致划分气井的无阻流量范围,判断其属于几类井,确定相应的配产和开发方案.现场实际应用证实了快速简化产能评价方法的可行性和实用性,苏里格气田苏25区块采用该方法,关井时间可以由原来的200 h减少为20 h,提高了试井效率,达到快速求产的目的.
囌裏格氣田滲透率低,非均質性明顯,單井產能穩定性差,常規產能評價方法不適用,需要研究一種針對該氣田儲層特點的簡單、快速、實用的方法評價氣井產能.研究髮現,關井早期20 h以內的壓力恢複數據,其雙對數麯線顯示的井筒儲集時間與井的產能存在明顯的對應關繫;其壓力比值麯線變化趨勢和數值範圍也與井的產能存在明顯的對應關繫,由此可以大緻劃分氣井的無阻流量範圍,判斷其屬于幾類井,確定相應的配產和開髮方案.現場實際應用證實瞭快速簡化產能評價方法的可行性和實用性,囌裏格氣田囌25區塊採用該方法,關井時間可以由原來的200 h減少為20 h,提高瞭試井效率,達到快速求產的目的.
소리격기전삼투솔저,비균질성명현,단정산능은정성차,상규산능평개방법불괄용,수요연구일충침대해기전저층특점적간단、쾌속、실용적방법평개기정산능.연구발현,관정조기20 h이내적압력회복수거,기쌍대수곡선현시적정통저집시간여정적산능존재명현적대응관계;기압력비치곡선변화추세화수치범위야여정적산능존재명현적대응관계,유차가이대치화분기정적무조류량범위,판단기속우궤류정,학정상응적배산화개발방안.현장실제응용증실료쾌속간화산능평개방법적가행성화실용성,소리격기전소25구괴채용해방법,관정시간가이유원래적200 h감소위20 h,제고료시정효솔,체도쾌속구산적목적.
Sulige Gasfield has distinguishing features of low permeability. significant heterogeneity and unstable single well deliverability. The conventional productivity evaluation methods are not applicable here, so a simple, fast and practical way suitable for this kind of reservoir is necessarily needed to obtain. Research results show that the wellbore storage time displayed by log-log plot of pressure recovery data has an obvious correspondence to the productivity in the early 20 hours of shut-in. It is the same with the pressure ratio curve trends and the range of values. From these findings above,the scope of AOF can be roughly classified, and the well type was then determined. Thus, the according proration and development programs can be formulated. Field practice proved the feasibility and practicality of the rapid and simple productivity evaluation method. By the use of this method, the shut-in time of Su 25 block decreased from 200 hours to 20 hours, and the goals of high testing efficiency and fast production definition were achieved.