中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2009年
11期
814-817
,共4页
田伯乐%张肇达%刘续宝%胡伟明%麦刚%曾勇%李振军%张懿%乐新会%陆慧敏
田伯樂%張肇達%劉續寶%鬍偉明%麥剛%曾勇%李振軍%張懿%樂新會%陸慧敏
전백악%장조체%류속보%호위명%맥강%증용%리진군%장의%악신회%륙혜민
胰十二指肠切除术%危险性评估%手术后并发症%病死率
胰十二指腸切除術%危險性評估%手術後併髮癥%病死率
이십이지장절제술%위험성평고%수술후병발증%병사솔
Pancreatoduodenectomy%Risk assessment%Postoperative complications%Mortality
目的 探讨POSSUM评分系统在预测胰十二指肠切除术(PD)手术风险中的价值.方法 采用POSSUM评分系统(含12项生理学指标和6项手术学指标)对2005年1月至2007年12月在四川大学华西医院肝胆胰外科接受PD手术的265例患者的资料前瞻性地进行评分,根据公式计算出预期术后并发症和术后病死率的发生情况;按Clavien术后并发症诊断标准和国内参考标准分别统计分析术后实际并发症的发生情况,并与预期并发症发生情况进行比较.结果 265例患者的生理学评分为12-24分,平均15分;手术学评分为14~24分,平均17分;POSSUM评分值为0.24~0.88分,预期平均并发症发生率为43.8%.发生例数为116例;实际观察有105例术后发生不同程度的并发症,实际并发症发生率为39.6%,与预测数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).进一步的分层分析发现,POSSUM评分为0.4~0.8分时预测最为准确;POSSUM评分系统在预测术后总的病死率时价值不大,但对于POSSUM评分≥0.5分患者的病死率预测仍有意义.结论 POSSUM评分系统能较好地预测PD的手术风险,对于PD手术及术后处理决策有指导意义.
目的 探討POSSUM評分繫統在預測胰十二指腸切除術(PD)手術風險中的價值.方法 採用POSSUM評分繫統(含12項生理學指標和6項手術學指標)對2005年1月至2007年12月在四川大學華西醫院肝膽胰外科接受PD手術的265例患者的資料前瞻性地進行評分,根據公式計算齣預期術後併髮癥和術後病死率的髮生情況;按Clavien術後併髮癥診斷標準和國內參攷標準分彆統計分析術後實際併髮癥的髮生情況,併與預期併髮癥髮生情況進行比較.結果 265例患者的生理學評分為12-24分,平均15分;手術學評分為14~24分,平均17分;POSSUM評分值為0.24~0.88分,預期平均併髮癥髮生率為43.8%.髮生例數為116例;實際觀察有105例術後髮生不同程度的併髮癥,實際併髮癥髮生率為39.6%,與預測數比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).進一步的分層分析髮現,POSSUM評分為0.4~0.8分時預測最為準確;POSSUM評分繫統在預測術後總的病死率時價值不大,但對于POSSUM評分≥0.5分患者的病死率預測仍有意義.結論 POSSUM評分繫統能較好地預測PD的手術風險,對于PD手術及術後處理決策有指導意義.
목적 탐토POSSUM평분계통재예측이십이지장절제술(PD)수술풍험중적개치.방법 채용POSSUM평분계통(함12항생이학지표화6항수술학지표)대2005년1월지2007년12월재사천대학화서의원간담이외과접수PD수술적265례환자적자료전첨성지진행평분,근거공식계산출예기술후병발증화술후병사솔적발생정황;안Clavien술후병발증진단표준화국내삼고표준분별통계분석술후실제병발증적발생정황,병여예기병발증발생정황진행비교.결과 265례환자적생이학평분위12-24분,평균15분;수술학평분위14~24분,평균17분;POSSUM평분치위0.24~0.88분,예기평균병발증발생솔위43.8%.발생례수위116례;실제관찰유105례술후발생불동정도적병발증,실제병발증발생솔위39.6%,여예측수비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).진일보적분층분석발현,POSSUM평분위0.4~0.8분시예측최위준학;POSSUM평분계통재예측술후총적병사솔시개치불대,단대우POSSUM평분≥0.5분환자적병사솔예측잉유의의.결론 POSSUM평분계통능교호지예측PD적수술풍험,대우PD수술급술후처리결책유지도의의.
Objective To explore the value of the POSSUM scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreatoduedenectomy (PD). Methods Two hundreds and sixty-five consecutive PDs were performed between January 2005 and December 2007. POSSUM scores which relied on 12 physiologic and 6 operative variables were prospectively calculated for each case. Expected morbidity and mortality were estimated based on POSSUM scores and were compared with observed morbidity ,which were diagnosed according to the Clavien complication scheme and domestic reference criteria respectively, and mortality. Results Physiologic scores of 265 cases ranged from 12 to 24, the mean was 15. Operative scores ranged from 14 to 24,the mean was 17. The overall POSSUM scores ranged from 0.24 to 0.88. Average expected morbidity was 43.8% ,expected cases were 116. Observed morbidity rate was 39. 6% (105/265). The expected and observed morbidities and cases had no significantly differences. All patients were classified to 1 of 4 strata based on their individual POSSUM scores and subsequent risk of morbidity. Predictive value was the highest when scores ranged from 0.4 to 0.8. POSSUM exhibited less predictive value for mortality, but if POSSUM was more than 0. 5, it was useful for mortality predicting. Conclusions POSSUM scoring system has high value for predicting the risk of morbidity in PD and can be helpful in guiding surgery and postoperative management decisions.