分析试验室
分析試驗室
분석시험실
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
2010年
1期
111-114
,共4页
超声波萃取%分散液-液微萃取%气相色谱%菌核净
超聲波萃取%分散液-液微萃取%氣相色譜%菌覈淨
초성파췌취%분산액-액미췌취%기상색보%균핵정
Ultrasonic extraction%Dispersive%Liquid-liquid microextraction%Gas chromatography%Dimethachlon
将超声波萃取(USE)与分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)联合, 利用气相色谱-电子捕获检测(GC-ECD), 建立了一种高灵敏度检测水体中菌核净的新方法. 对萃取的条件进行优化, 选定萃取条件为: 在5 mL样品中, 注入1 mL丙酮和0.1 mL的四氯化碳混合液, 20 Hz超声10 min, 振荡混匀后高速离心5 min, 移出下层溶剂低温吹干以丙酮定容自动进样分析. 在优化条件下, 样品的富集倍数可达50倍, 检出限为0.001 μg/mL, 对采于蔬菜地边的水样进行加标回收率实验, 平均回收率在81%以上, 相对标准偏差在4.3%~7.6%之间, 方法可满足水样中菌核净农药残留的检测要求.
將超聲波萃取(USE)與分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)聯閤, 利用氣相色譜-電子捕穫檢測(GC-ECD), 建立瞭一種高靈敏度檢測水體中菌覈淨的新方法. 對萃取的條件進行優化, 選定萃取條件為: 在5 mL樣品中, 註入1 mL丙酮和0.1 mL的四氯化碳混閤液, 20 Hz超聲10 min, 振盪混勻後高速離心5 min, 移齣下層溶劑低溫吹榦以丙酮定容自動進樣分析. 在優化條件下, 樣品的富集倍數可達50倍, 檢齣限為0.001 μg/mL, 對採于蔬菜地邊的水樣進行加標迴收率實驗, 平均迴收率在81%以上, 相對標準偏差在4.3%~7.6%之間, 方法可滿足水樣中菌覈淨農藥殘留的檢測要求.
장초성파췌취(USE)여분산액-액미췌취(DLLME)연합, 이용기상색보-전자포획검측(GC-ECD), 건립료일충고령민도검측수체중균핵정적신방법. 대췌취적조건진행우화, 선정췌취조건위: 재5 mL양품중, 주입1 mL병동화0.1 mL적사록화탄혼합액, 20 Hz초성10 min, 진탕혼균후고속리심5 min, 이출하층용제저온취간이병동정용자동진양분석. 재우화조건하, 양품적부집배수가체50배, 검출한위0.001 μg/mL, 대채우소채지변적수양진행가표회수솔실험, 평균회수솔재81%이상, 상대표준편차재4.3%~7.6%지간, 방법가만족수양중균핵정농약잔류적검측요구.
A nove1 method was developed for the determination of dimethachlon by ultrasonic extraction (USE) with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with capillary gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Some important parameters that influence the extraction efficiency, such as the kind of the extraction and disperser solvent, their volume and the extraction time were investigated. In the method, 1.0 mL of acetone and 0.1 mL of carbon tetrachloride were rapidly injected into a 5.0 mL of sample, after 20 Hz ultrasonic vibration for 10 min and high speed centrifugation for 5 min, shifted out the lower layer, blew dry at lower temperature, dissolved with certain volume acetone and automatically injected into the GC for analysis. Under the optimum conditions, as high as 50 fold enrichment factors were achieved with the detection limits of 0.001 μg/mL. The spiked recovery reached up to 81% and the relative standard deviations were between 4.3% and 7.6%. The method was proven to be simple and environmental benign with high enrichment factor and high sensitivity.