中国中西医结合杂志
中國中西醫結閤雜誌
중국중서의결합잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED TRADITIONAL AND WESTERN MEDICINE
2010年
3期
275-279
,共5页
周彩云%唐今扬%房定亚%潘峥%马芳
週綵雲%唐今颺%房定亞%潘崢%馬芳
주채운%당금양%방정아%반쟁%마방
类风湿关节炎%活动期%四妙消痹汤%甲氨蝶呤%湿热毒痹证
類風濕關節炎%活動期%四妙消痺湯%甲氨蝶呤%濕熱毒痺證
류풍습관절염%활동기%사묘소비탕%갑안접령%습열독비증
rheumatoid arthritis%active stage%Simiao Xiaobi Decoction%methotrexate%humid pyretic toxic Bi-Zheng
目的 观察四妙消痹汤治疗类风湿关节炎(rheumatold arthritis,RA)活动期湿热毒痹证的临床疗效及安全性.方法 将120例患者随机分为治疗组(四妙消痹汤组,60例)和对照组(甲氨蝶呤组,60例),疗程均为12周.评价治疗前后中、西医疗效,中、西医症状体征,中医证候积分及DAS28积分,理化指标变化,远期疗效及平均起效时间,其中西医疗效评价参照欧洲风湿病防治联合会(EULAR)判定标准,对药物疗效进行意向性分析(ITT)和符合方案数据分析(PP),同时观察记录不良反应.结果 研究纳入患者120例(ITT集),完成观察患者103例(PP集).PP分析显示:治疗组(52例)中、西医疗效均优于对照组(51例,分别是92.3%vs70.6%及86.5%vs62.7%,P<0.05).在改善患者症状、体征,降低中医证候积分、DAS28积分以及远期疗效方面,治疗组较对照组有一定优势.治疗组起效时间(周)5.31±0.36短于对照组(8.28±0.45,P<0.05),而不良反应发生率(6.7%)低于对照组(43.3%,P<0.05).结论 四妙消痹汤可综合改善类风湿关节炎活动期湿热毒痹证患者的关节及全身病变,且起效早,不良反应较少.
目的 觀察四妙消痺湯治療類風濕關節炎(rheumatold arthritis,RA)活動期濕熱毒痺證的臨床療效及安全性.方法 將120例患者隨機分為治療組(四妙消痺湯組,60例)和對照組(甲氨蝶呤組,60例),療程均為12週.評價治療前後中、西醫療效,中、西醫癥狀體徵,中醫證候積分及DAS28積分,理化指標變化,遠期療效及平均起效時間,其中西醫療效評價參照歐洲風濕病防治聯閤會(EULAR)判定標準,對藥物療效進行意嚮性分析(ITT)和符閤方案數據分析(PP),同時觀察記錄不良反應.結果 研究納入患者120例(ITT集),完成觀察患者103例(PP集).PP分析顯示:治療組(52例)中、西醫療效均優于對照組(51例,分彆是92.3%vs70.6%及86.5%vs62.7%,P<0.05).在改善患者癥狀、體徵,降低中醫證候積分、DAS28積分以及遠期療效方麵,治療組較對照組有一定優勢.治療組起效時間(週)5.31±0.36短于對照組(8.28±0.45,P<0.05),而不良反應髮生率(6.7%)低于對照組(43.3%,P<0.05).結論 四妙消痺湯可綜閤改善類風濕關節炎活動期濕熱毒痺證患者的關節及全身病變,且起效早,不良反應較少.
목적 관찰사묘소비탕치료류풍습관절염(rheumatold arthritis,RA)활동기습열독비증적림상료효급안전성.방법 장120례환자수궤분위치료조(사묘소비탕조,60례)화대조조(갑안접령조,60례),료정균위12주.평개치료전후중、서의료효,중、서의증상체정,중의증후적분급DAS28적분,이화지표변화,원기료효급평균기효시간,기중서의료효평개삼조구주풍습병방치연합회(EULAR)판정표준,대약물료효진행의향성분석(ITT)화부합방안수거분석(PP),동시관찰기록불량반응.결과 연구납입환자120례(ITT집),완성관찰환자103례(PP집).PP분석현시:치료조(52례)중、서의료효균우우대조조(51례,분별시92.3%vs70.6%급86.5%vs62.7%,P<0.05).재개선환자증상、체정,강저중의증후적분、DAS28적분이급원기료효방면,치료조교대조조유일정우세.치료조기효시간(주)5.31±0.36단우대조조(8.28±0.45,P<0.05),이불량반응발생솔(6.7%)저우대조조(43.3%,P<0.05).결론 사묘소비탕가종합개선류풍습관절염활동기습열독비증환자적관절급전신병변,차기효조,불량반응교소.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Simiao Xiaobi Decoction (SXO) in treating active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of humid pyretic toxic Bi-Zheng (HPTB) syndrome type.Methods One hundred and twenty RA patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups,60 in the treatment group receiving SXD,and 60 in the control group receiving methotrexate,all were treated for 12 weeks.Clinical efficacy in patients was evaluated,referring to the criteria recommended by European League Against Rheumatoism (EULAR),in terms of effective rate,main symptoms,signs,scoring on symptom/sign by Chinese medicine scale and DAS28,physical and chemical indices,long-term outcome of patients and the average therapeutic effect initiating time.Meantime,the adverse reaction was recorded.Results The study was completed in 103 patients,52 in the treated group and 51 in the control group.According to a per-protocol analysis,the effective rate was better in the treatment group than in the control group with marked difference in terms of Chinese and Western medicine respectively (92.3% vs 70.6% and 86.5% vs 62.7%,P<0.05).Superiorities in the treatment group were also seen in the improvements of main symptoms and signs,symptom/sign scores,DAS28 scores,and long-term outcome.Moreover,the average therapeutic effect initiating time was shorter (5.31±0.36 weeks vs 8.28±0.45 weeks),while the incidence of adverse reaction was less in the treatment group than in the control group (6.7% vs 43.3%,P<0.05).Conclusion SXD can improve the joint symptoms and general condition of RA patients of HPTB type with shorter initiating time and less adverse reaction.