中华创伤杂志
中華創傷雜誌
중화창상잡지
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2011年
11期
967-973
,共7页
孙辉%罗从风%王建伟%张博%施慧鹏%曾炳芳
孫輝%囉從風%王建偉%張博%施慧鵬%曾炳芳
손휘%라종풍%왕건위%장박%시혜붕%증병방
骨折固定术,内%内固定器%下胫腓联合
骨摺固定術,內%內固定器%下脛腓聯閤
골절고정술,내%내고정기%하경비연합
Fracture fixation,internal%Internal fixation%Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis
目的 通过前瞻性随机对照研究评估金属(钛合金)和生物可吸收(多聚左旋乳酸)螺钉固定下胫腓联合的疗效,并分析潜在的并发症风险.方法 2007年1月- 2008年5月共48例踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤患者入组.通过随机数字表法实现完全随机分组,其中金属螺钉固定组20例,可吸收螺钉固定组28例.47例患者接受至少2年的随访,进行影像学和临床评估.结果 总随访率达98%.两组患者人口学信息差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访满1年及2年时,两组间Baird评分各指标、总分及Baird评级差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).至随访末,两组患、健侧踝关节之间活动度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).可吸收螺钉组主要出现2例中度排异反应及2例下胫腓异位骨化并发症.结论 可吸收螺钉是下胫腓联合损伤固定的有效内置物,与金属材料螺钉相比,可避免二次手术取出,同时可以达到与前者相同的固定效果.但其也存在多种并发症的可能,如排异反应及异位骨化等不容忽视.
目的 通過前瞻性隨機對照研究評估金屬(鈦閤金)和生物可吸收(多聚左鏇乳痠)螺釘固定下脛腓聯閤的療效,併分析潛在的併髮癥風險.方法 2007年1月- 2008年5月共48例踝關節骨摺伴下脛腓聯閤損傷患者入組.通過隨機數字錶法實現完全隨機分組,其中金屬螺釘固定組20例,可吸收螺釘固定組28例.47例患者接受至少2年的隨訪,進行影像學和臨床評估.結果 總隨訪率達98%.兩組患者人口學信息差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).隨訪滿1年及2年時,兩組間Baird評分各指標、總分及Baird評級差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).至隨訪末,兩組患、健側踝關節之間活動度差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).可吸收螺釘組主要齣現2例中度排異反應及2例下脛腓異位骨化併髮癥.結論 可吸收螺釘是下脛腓聯閤損傷固定的有效內置物,與金屬材料螺釘相比,可避免二次手術取齣,同時可以達到與前者相同的固定效果.但其也存在多種併髮癥的可能,如排異反應及異位骨化等不容忽視.
목적 통과전첨성수궤대조연구평고금속(태합금)화생물가흡수(다취좌선유산)라정고정하경비연합적료효,병분석잠재적병발증풍험.방법 2007년1월- 2008년5월공48례과관절골절반하경비연합손상환자입조.통과수궤수자표법실현완전수궤분조,기중금속라정고정조20례,가흡수라정고정조28례.47례환자접수지소2년적수방,진행영상학화림상평고.결과 총수방솔체98%.량조환자인구학신식차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).수방만1년급2년시,량조간Baird평분각지표、총분급Baird평급차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).지수방말,량조환、건측과관절지간활동도차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).가흡수라정조주요출현2례중도배이반응급2례하경비이위골화병발증.결론 가흡수라정시하경비연합손상고정적유효내치물,여금속재료라정상비,가피면이차수술취출,동시가이체도여전자상동적고정효과.단기야존재다충병발증적가능,여배이반응급이위골화등불용홀시.
Objective To evaluate the effect and potential risks of two types of materials ( taitanum versus polylevolactic acid,PLLA) screws on fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis by a prospective randomized comparative clinical study.Methods From January 2007 to May 2008,48 patients with ankle fractures combined with a verified syndesmotic rupture were randomly allocated to receive either bioabsorbable PLLA (n =28 ) or titanium (n =20) screw fixation.The patients were assessed in aspects of radiography,function recovery and complication during follow-up.Results The total followup rate was 98%.The demographic information of the two groups showed no statistical difference ( P >0.05).After 1-2 years of follow-up,the indexes including Baird score,total score,and Baird grade were not statistically different between the two groups ( P > 0.05).At the end of follow-up,there was significant difference in regard of joint motion between the injured and uninjured ankle in both groups ( P <0.05).Moderate rejection occurred in two patients and tibiofibular heterotopic ossification in two in PLLA group.Conclusions There is no significant difference between the bioabsorbable and metallic screws with regard to ankle function recovery,but the bioabsorbable screw fixation can avoid a second operation for taking out the screw.However,the complication risk of the bioabsorbable screws should not be ignored,such as rejection reaction,heterotopic ossification.