植物学报
植物學報
식물학보
ACTA BOTANICA SINICA
2004年
3期
311-318
,共8页
前胡族%花粉外壁%超微结构%系统位置
前鬍族%花粉外壁%超微結構%繫統位置
전호족%화분외벽%초미결구%계통위치
Peucedaneae Drude%pollen exine%ultrastructure%systematic position
报道了前胡族(Peucedaneae Drude)当归亚族(Angelicinae Drude)、阿魏亚族(Ferulinae Drude)和环翅芹亚族(TordyliinaeDrude)等3亚族18属18种植物的花粉外壁表面和内部的超微结构.根据花粉外壁超微结构资料,论述了18种及其所在属的系统位置.对现时尚存疑的问题,诸如当归亚族中的山芹属(Ostericum Hoffm.)等7属(种),经分析认为统归于当归属(Angelica L.)不恰当;阿魏亚族中的球根阿魏(Schumannia turcomanica Kuntze)、伊犁芹(Talassiatransiliensis(Herd.)Korov.)、胀果芹(Phlojodicarpus villosus(Turcz.ex Fisch.et Mey.)Turcz.ex Ledeb.)等属的代表种显示其外壁演化程度相差甚大,应以与阿魏属(Ferula L.)分别独立为宜;环翅芹亚族(Tordyliinae Drude)中大瓣芹属(Semenovia Regel et Herd.)与独活属(Heracleum L.)的代表种其外壁演化程度相距甚远,也以分立为宜.
報道瞭前鬍族(Peucedaneae Drude)噹歸亞族(Angelicinae Drude)、阿魏亞族(Ferulinae Drude)和環翅芹亞族(TordyliinaeDrude)等3亞族18屬18種植物的花粉外壁錶麵和內部的超微結構.根據花粉外壁超微結構資料,論述瞭18種及其所在屬的繫統位置.對現時尚存疑的問題,諸如噹歸亞族中的山芹屬(Ostericum Hoffm.)等7屬(種),經分析認為統歸于噹歸屬(Angelica L.)不恰噹;阿魏亞族中的毬根阿魏(Schumannia turcomanica Kuntze)、伊犛芹(Talassiatransiliensis(Herd.)Korov.)、脹果芹(Phlojodicarpus villosus(Turcz.ex Fisch.et Mey.)Turcz.ex Ledeb.)等屬的代錶種顯示其外壁縯化程度相差甚大,應以與阿魏屬(Ferula L.)分彆獨立為宜;環翅芹亞族(Tordyliinae Drude)中大瓣芹屬(Semenovia Regel et Herd.)與獨活屬(Heracleum L.)的代錶種其外壁縯化程度相距甚遠,也以分立為宜.
보도료전호족(Peucedaneae Drude)당귀아족(Angelicinae Drude)、아위아족(Ferulinae Drude)화배시근아족(TordyliinaeDrude)등3아족18속18충식물적화분외벽표면화내부적초미결구.근거화분외벽초미결구자료,논술료18충급기소재속적계통위치.대현시상존의적문제,제여당귀아족중적산근속(Ostericum Hoffm.)등7속(충),경분석인위통귀우당귀속(Angelica L.)불흡당;아위아족중적구근아위(Schumannia turcomanica Kuntze)、이리근(Talassiatransiliensis(Herd.)Korov.)、창과근(Phlojodicarpus villosus(Turcz.ex Fisch.et Mey.)Turcz.ex Ledeb.)등속적대표충현시기외벽연화정도상차심대,응이여아위속(Ferula L.)분별독립위의;배시근아족(Tordyliinae Drude)중대판근속(Semenovia Regel et Herd.)여독활속(Heracleum L.)적대표충기외벽연화정도상거심원,야이분립위의.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation of pollen grains of 18 species belonging to 18 respective genera of the tribe Peucedaneae Drude revealed distinct ultrastructural difference in the pollen exine, including the thickness and features of tectum, columnar layer, foot layer and endexine. The systematic position of those 18 species are re-evaluated based on their ultrastructural characteristics of pollen exine observed in this study. Seven genera related to Angelica L. In Angelicinae Drude have been deduced to genus Angelica L. For example, Ostericum grosseserratum (Maxim.) Kitagawa was changed to Angelica L. By some authors, but it differs from Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels in having well developed tectum which is thicker than the columnar layer and foot layer. Its columnar layer is quite well-developed with long and branched columellae. Besides its surface is tuberculated. Evidently, its development exceeds that of Angelica sinensis. However, it is only a moderate evolutional species in its genus, and the Angelica sinensis accounts as the most advanced species in Angelica Diels, thus, placing genus Ostericum Hoffm.in Angelica L. Is not suitable, it may be more appropriate to keep its original position. In addition, Ferula akitschkensis B. Fedtsch. Ex K.-Pol. Differs greatly from those of Talassia transiliensis (Herd.) Korov. And Schumannia turcomnnia Kuntze, because of its very well-developed columnar layer, being about four to five times thicker than the total of tectum and foot layer, tuberculated tectum surface and complicated structure of columnellae. As another species Heracleum forrestii Wolff also differs from Semenovia rubtzovii(Schischk.) Monden. In having an even thickness of exine and well-developed columnar layer, it seems suitable that they should also be treated as two independent genera.