四川大学学报(自然科学版)
四川大學學報(自然科學版)
사천대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2010年
2期
387-392
,共6页
凌林%王颖%刘世昌%冉江洪%岳碧松
凌林%王穎%劉世昌%冉江洪%嶽碧鬆
릉림%왕영%류세창%염강홍%악벽송
大熊猫%岷山北部%生境适宜性评价%景观格局%生境破碎化
大熊貓%岷山北部%生境適宜性評價%景觀格跼%生境破碎化
대웅묘%민산북부%생경괄의성평개%경관격국%생경파쇄화
giant panda(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)%north minshan mountains%habitat suitability assessment%landscape pattern%habitat fragmentation
以全国第三次大熊猫调查数据和2005~2007年的野外调查数据为基础,利用地理信息系统、遥感软件和景观格局分析软件,对岷山北部区域大熊猫生境的分布、适宜性和空间格局进行了分析,结果表明:(1)在岷山北部791445.51 hm~2的研究区域内,大熊猫潜在生境的面积为91129.14 hm~2,由于人为活动的影响,实际生境面积仅为89113.5 hm~2,占研究区域总面积的11.26%;(2)在大熊猫实际生境中,适宜栖息地面积占30.4%,最适合大熊猫取食的竹类盖度(大于50%)的竹林面积仅占实际生境的20.2%;(3)大熊猫生境景观指数分析显示,生境内斑块数量多,斑块平均面积小,栖息地破碎化程度高.鉴于岷山北部地区大熊猫生境自然条件较差,大面积的生境不能被大熊猫有效利用,需要加强对该区域适宜生境的保护,同时加强植被的恢复与改造,以提高大熊猫生境的连通性和适宜性.
以全國第三次大熊貓調查數據和2005~2007年的野外調查數據為基礎,利用地理信息繫統、遙感軟件和景觀格跼分析軟件,對岷山北部區域大熊貓生境的分佈、適宜性和空間格跼進行瞭分析,結果錶明:(1)在岷山北部791445.51 hm~2的研究區域內,大熊貓潛在生境的麵積為91129.14 hm~2,由于人為活動的影響,實際生境麵積僅為89113.5 hm~2,佔研究區域總麵積的11.26%;(2)在大熊貓實際生境中,適宜棲息地麵積佔30.4%,最適閤大熊貓取食的竹類蓋度(大于50%)的竹林麵積僅佔實際生境的20.2%;(3)大熊貓生境景觀指數分析顯示,生境內斑塊數量多,斑塊平均麵積小,棲息地破碎化程度高.鑒于岷山北部地區大熊貓生境自然條件較差,大麵積的生境不能被大熊貓有效利用,需要加彊對該區域適宜生境的保護,同時加彊植被的恢複與改造,以提高大熊貓生境的連通性和適宜性.
이전국제삼차대웅묘조사수거화2005~2007년적야외조사수거위기출,이용지리신식계통、요감연건화경관격국분석연건,대민산북부구역대웅묘생경적분포、괄의성화공간격국진행료분석,결과표명:(1)재민산북부791445.51 hm~2적연구구역내,대웅묘잠재생경적면적위91129.14 hm~2,유우인위활동적영향,실제생경면적부위89113.5 hm~2,점연구구역총면적적11.26%;(2)재대웅묘실제생경중,괄의서식지면적점30.4%,최괄합대웅묘취식적죽류개도(대우50%)적죽림면적부점실제생경적20.2%;(3)대웅묘생경경관지수분석현시,생경내반괴수량다,반괴평균면적소,서식지파쇄화정도고.감우민산북부지구대웅묘생경자연조건교차,대면적적생경불능피대웅묘유효이용,수요가강대해구역괄의생경적보호,동시가강식피적회복여개조,이제고대웅묘생경적련통성화괄의성.
Based on the data of the Third National Survey and 2005~2007 field survey, using the GIS and RS softwares,the distribution, suitability and spatial pattern of giant panda habitat in North Minshan Mountains were studied. It was found that: (1) The potential habitat of giant panda in this region covered 91129.14 hm~2. However, affected by the human activities the factual habitat was only 89113.5 hm~2, accounting for 11.26% of the total survey area. (2) Only 30.4% of the factual habitat was most suitable for giant panda, and the area of pandas' preferred bamboos (coverage above 50%) was about 20.2%. (3) The landscape indexes showed that the giant panda habitat in this area was in a considerable fragmented situation, being separated into a great many patches, the average area of which was quite small. As for this condition, protection and management measures for the giant panda and its habitat were proposed.