CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨无创正压通气在治疗急性左心衰竭中的应用价值.方法急性左心衰竭患者86例,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组43例.对照组患者给予常规治疗方法,而研究组患者则采用呼吸机进行无创正压通气治疗.结果研究组患者显效率60.5%(26例)和总有效率95.4%(41例)均明显提高,而无效率明显降低;与此同时,研究组患者治疗后HR和RR均明显降低,而PaO2和SaO2则明显提高,与对照组相比,均差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论采用无创正压通气治疗急性左心衰竭,疗效确切,效果显著.
목적 탐토무창정압통기재치료급성좌심쇠갈중적응용개치.방법 급성좌심쇠갈환자86례,수궤분위연구조화대조조,매조43례.대조조환자급여상규치료방법,이연구조환자칙채용호흡궤진행무창정압통기치료.결과 연구조환자현효솔60.5%(26례)화총유효솔95.4%(41례)균명현제고,이무효솔명현강저;여차동시,연구조환자치료후HR화RR균명현강저,이PaO2화SaO2칙명현제고,여대조조상비,균차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 채용무창정압통기치료급성좌심쇠갈,료효학절,효과현저.
Objective To explore the application value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute left heart failure. Methods 86 patients with acute left heart failure were selected and randomly divided into study group and control group,43 patients in each group. Two groups of patients after diagnosis,the control group were treated with conventional treatment, while patients in the study group were given breathing machine with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation treatment. Results Compared with control group,the efficiency and total effective rate in the study group were significantly increased, but the ineffictive rate significantly lower, there were significant differences (P<0. 05). At the same time,patients in the study group,HR and RR were significantly decreased,while PaO2 and SaO2 treatment were significantly higher, there were significant differences (P < 0. 05). Conclusion Use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute left heart failure,its effects were positive,significant effect on the treatment of acute left heart failure is of great clinical value.