CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨氧动力雾化吸入和空气压缩雾化吸入治疗毛细支气管炎的效果及护理。方法按患儿入住时间分为氧动力雾化吸入组64例和空气压缩雾化吸入组65例，观察比较两组患儿治疗及护理的效果。结果氧动力雾化吸入组治疗总有效率96.87％，空气压缩雾化吸入组治疗总有效率98.46％，两种雾化吸入方式对治疗毛细支气管炎的疗效比较，差异无统计学意义(x2 =0.457，P＞0.05)。结论两组雾化吸入方式均可治疗毛细支气管炎，但空气压缩雾化吸入方式更具有安全、经济、操作简单、携带方便等优点，值得推广应用。
목적 탐토양동력무화흡입화공기압축무화흡입치료모세지기관염적효과급호리。방법 안환인입주시간분위양동력무화흡입조64례화공기압축무화흡입조65례，관찰비교량조환인치료급호리적효과。결과 양동력무화흡입조치료총유효솔96.87％，공기압축무화흡입조치료총유효솔98.46％，량충무화흡입방식대치료모세지기관염적료효비교，차이무통계학의의(x2 =0.457，P＞0.05)。결론 량조무화흡입방식균가치료모세지기관염，단공기압축무화흡입방식경구유안전、경제、조작간단、휴대방편등우점，치득추엄응용。
Objective To discuss the effect and nursing of oxygen nebulization and compressed air nebulization on capillary bronchitis. Methods According to check-in time, 129 children with capillary bronchitis were divided into oxygen nebulization group and compressed air nebulization group. Treatment effect and nursing was observed and compared. Results Effective rate was 96.87 ％ in the oxygen nebulization group and 98.46％ in the compressed air nebulization group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (X2 = 0. 457, P ＞ 0. 05). Conclusions The two types of nebulization could both treat capillary bronchitis. However, compressed air nebulization shows obvious advantages considering its safety, economy,simple operation and convenient carrying, thus presents strong practicability.