中华创伤骨科杂志
中華創傷骨科雜誌
중화창상골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
2011年
6期
530-533
,共4页
王富明%陈鸿奋%陈滨%任高宏%杨运平%秦煜%王钢
王富明%陳鴻奮%陳濱%任高宏%楊運平%秦煜%王鋼
왕부명%진홍강%진빈%임고굉%양운평%진욱%왕강
胫骨%股骨%外固定器%骨缺损
脛骨%股骨%外固定器%骨缺損
경골%고골%외고정기%골결손
Tibia%Femur,External fixations%Bone defect
目的 探讨应用牵拉成骨技术治疗下肢大段骨缺损的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2002年8月至2010年8月收治的11例下肢大段骨缺损患者临床资料,男10例,女1例;年龄14~53岁,平均34.5岁.均行牵拉成骨治疗,右侧胫骨7例,左侧胫骨3例,右侧股骨1例;骨缺损长度5~15cm,平均8.6 cm;9例治疗已结束,2例仍处于矿化阶段.结果 所有患者术后获7~48个月(平均27.3个月)随访.9例治疗结束患者,平均骨愈合指数为1.99个月/cm;根据Paley评价系统评价骨性结果:优6例,良3例,优良率为100%;功能结果:优4例,良4例,一般1例.结论应用牵拉成骨技术治疗大段骨缺损,手术操作简单,尤其是对于单纯骨干缺损患者,采用单边外固定支架治疗,且其手术操作更为简洁.
目的 探討應用牽拉成骨技術治療下肢大段骨缺損的臨床療效.方法 迴顧性分析2002年8月至2010年8月收治的11例下肢大段骨缺損患者臨床資料,男10例,女1例;年齡14~53歲,平均34.5歲.均行牽拉成骨治療,右側脛骨7例,左側脛骨3例,右側股骨1例;骨缺損長度5~15cm,平均8.6 cm;9例治療已結束,2例仍處于礦化階段.結果 所有患者術後穫7~48箇月(平均27.3箇月)隨訪.9例治療結束患者,平均骨愈閤指數為1.99箇月/cm;根據Paley評價繫統評價骨性結果:優6例,良3例,優良率為100%;功能結果:優4例,良4例,一般1例.結論應用牽拉成骨技術治療大段骨缺損,手術操作簡單,尤其是對于單純骨榦缺損患者,採用單邊外固定支架治療,且其手術操作更為簡潔.
목적 탐토응용견랍성골기술치료하지대단골결손적림상료효.방법 회고성분석2002년8월지2010년8월수치적11례하지대단골결손환자림상자료,남10례,녀1례;년령14~53세,평균34.5세.균행견랍성골치료,우측경골7례,좌측경골3례,우측고골1례;골결손장도5~15cm,평균8.6 cm;9례치료이결속,2례잉처우광화계단.결과 소유환자술후획7~48개월(평균27.3개월)수방.9례치료결속환자,평균골유합지수위1.99개월/cm;근거Paley평개계통평개골성결과:우6례,량3례,우량솔위100%;공능결과:우4례,량4례,일반1례.결론응용견랍성골기술치료대단골결손,수술조작간단,우기시대우단순골간결손환자,채용단변외고정지가치료,차기수술조작경위간길.
Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect of distraction osteogenesis for large bone defect of the lower extremity. Methods From August 2002 to August 2010, 11 patients with large bone defect at the lower extremity were treated with distraction osteogenesis. They were 10 men and one woman, aged from 14 to 53 years (average, 34. S years). The defect was at the right tibia in 7 cases, left tibia in 3 cases and right femur in one case. The lengths of bone defect ranged from 5 to 15 cm (average, 8. 6 cm). Results The patients were followed up for 7 to 48 months, with a mean period of 27. 3 months. The treatment of 9 cases was over, with a mean healing index of 1. 99 months/cm. According to the Paley evaluation system, the bony results were excellent in 6 and good in 3 patients; the functional results were excellent in 4, good in 4, and fair in one patient. Two cases were still in the mineralization period. Conclusion Treatment of large bone defects with distraction osteogenesis is simple and can obtain satisfactory therapeutic effects, especially when a monolateral external fixator is used for the simple shaft bone defect.