中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2012年
22期
1540-1543
,共4页
杨俊%厉朝喜%戴一扬%彭芳%翁秀妹%季木西
楊俊%厲朝喜%戴一颺%彭芳%翁秀妹%季木西
양준%려조희%대일양%팽방%옹수매%계목서
胃蛋白酶原A%胃蛋白酶原C%胃溃疡%胃肿瘤%三叶因子1蛋白
胃蛋白酶原A%胃蛋白酶原C%胃潰瘍%胃腫瘤%三葉因子1蛋白
위단백매원A%위단백매원C%위궤양%위종류%삼협인자1단백
Pepsinogen A%Pepsinogen C%Stomach ulcer%Stomach neoplasms%Trefoil factor 1 protein
目的 探讨组织三叶因子1(TFF1)蛋白表达水平与血清胃蛋向酶原(PG)在鉴别良、恶性胃溃疡中的临床意义.方法 筛选自2011年1-6月在浙江医院行胃镜及病理组织学检查的18例对照、25例胃溃疡和13例溃疡型胃癌患者的胃黏膜组织,采用免疫组织化学法测定胃黏膜中TFF1蛋白的表达;酶联免疫吸附法( EUSA)检测血清PG Ⅰ、Ⅱ含量并计算PGⅠ与PGⅡ的比值(PGR).结果 胃溃疡、溃疡旁组织、胃癌旁组织中TFF1表达明显均高于对照胃黏膜和胃癌组织(3.04%±0.20%、3.00%±0.20%、3.23%±0.26%比1.67%±0.18%和0.46%±0.18%,均P<0.01).TFF1升高增加患者罹患胃溃疡风险(OR:1.365,95% CI1.065 - 1.749,P=0.014);TFF1表达下调则增高患者罹患胃癌风险(OR:3.067,95% CI 1.391 ~6.757,P =0.005).胃溃疡组患者血清PGⅠ、PGⅡ水平均明显高于对照及胃癌组[(150±27)、(28±9)比(121±22)、(17±7),(79±12)、(20±5)μg/L,均P<0.01];胃癌组血清PGⅠ、PGR均显著低于对照组(均P<0.01),PGⅡ水平则与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).受试者特征曲线分析:血清PGI及PGR对胃癌的诊断价值较高(曲线下面积分别为0.975和0.914).结论 TFF1蛋白在胃溃疡中高表达,而在胃癌中表达明显降低;血清PGⅠ、PGⅡ显著升高提示良性溃疡,而血清PGI、PGR明显降低是恶性溃疡的危险信号.检测TFF1蛋白表达和血清PG水平有利于良、恶性胃溃疡的鉴别诊断.
目的 探討組織三葉因子1(TFF1)蛋白錶達水平與血清胃蛋嚮酶原(PG)在鑒彆良、噁性胃潰瘍中的臨床意義.方法 篩選自2011年1-6月在浙江醫院行胃鏡及病理組織學檢查的18例對照、25例胃潰瘍和13例潰瘍型胃癌患者的胃黏膜組織,採用免疫組織化學法測定胃黏膜中TFF1蛋白的錶達;酶聯免疫吸附法( EUSA)檢測血清PG Ⅰ、Ⅱ含量併計算PGⅠ與PGⅡ的比值(PGR).結果 胃潰瘍、潰瘍徬組織、胃癌徬組織中TFF1錶達明顯均高于對照胃黏膜和胃癌組織(3.04%±0.20%、3.00%±0.20%、3.23%±0.26%比1.67%±0.18%和0.46%±0.18%,均P<0.01).TFF1升高增加患者罹患胃潰瘍風險(OR:1.365,95% CI1.065 - 1.749,P=0.014);TFF1錶達下調則增高患者罹患胃癌風險(OR:3.067,95% CI 1.391 ~6.757,P =0.005).胃潰瘍組患者血清PGⅠ、PGⅡ水平均明顯高于對照及胃癌組[(150±27)、(28±9)比(121±22)、(17±7),(79±12)、(20±5)μg/L,均P<0.01];胃癌組血清PGⅠ、PGR均顯著低于對照組(均P<0.01),PGⅡ水平則與對照組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).受試者特徵麯線分析:血清PGI及PGR對胃癌的診斷價值較高(麯線下麵積分彆為0.975和0.914).結論 TFF1蛋白在胃潰瘍中高錶達,而在胃癌中錶達明顯降低;血清PGⅠ、PGⅡ顯著升高提示良性潰瘍,而血清PGI、PGR明顯降低是噁性潰瘍的危險信號.檢測TFF1蛋白錶達和血清PG水平有利于良、噁性胃潰瘍的鑒彆診斷.
목적 탐토조직삼협인자1(TFF1)단백표체수평여혈청위단향매원(PG)재감별량、악성위궤양중적림상의의.방법 사선자2011년1-6월재절강의원행위경급병리조직학검사적18례대조、25례위궤양화13례궤양형위암환자적위점막조직,채용면역조직화학법측정위점막중TFF1단백적표체;매련면역흡부법( EUSA)검측혈청PG Ⅰ、Ⅱ함량병계산PGⅠ여PGⅡ적비치(PGR).결과 위궤양、궤양방조직、위암방조직중TFF1표체명현균고우대조위점막화위암조직(3.04%±0.20%、3.00%±0.20%、3.23%±0.26%비1.67%±0.18%화0.46%±0.18%,균P<0.01).TFF1승고증가환자리환위궤양풍험(OR:1.365,95% CI1.065 - 1.749,P=0.014);TFF1표체하조칙증고환자리환위암풍험(OR:3.067,95% CI 1.391 ~6.757,P =0.005).위궤양조환자혈청PGⅠ、PGⅡ수평균명현고우대조급위암조[(150±27)、(28±9)비(121±22)、(17±7),(79±12)、(20±5)μg/L,균P<0.01];위암조혈청PGⅠ、PGR균현저저우대조조(균P<0.01),PGⅡ수평칙여대조조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).수시자특정곡선분석:혈청PGI급PGR대위암적진단개치교고(곡선하면적분별위0.975화0.914).결론 TFF1단백재위궤양중고표체,이재위암중표체명현강저;혈청PGⅠ、PGⅡ현저승고제시량성궤양,이혈청PGI、PGR명현강저시악성궤양적위험신호.검측TFF1단백표체화혈청PG수평유리우량、악성위궤양적감별진단.
Objective To explore the clinical significance of trefoil factor 1 ( TFF1 ) protein expression and serum pepsinogen(PG) concentration in benign and malignant gastric ulcers.Methods The TFF1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in biopsies of gastric mucosa from 18 normal controls,25 patients with gastric ulcer and 13 patients with ulcerative gastric cancer at our hospital during January to June 2011. The serum concentrations of PG Ⅰ and PG Ⅱ were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and PG/PG Ⅱ (PGR) was subsequently calculated.Results The expression of TFF1 protein increased significantly in ulcerative and peripheral gastric mocusa and peripheral mocusa of gastric cancers versus that in normal controls and the ulcerocancer group ( 3.04% ± 0.20%,3.00% ±0.20%,3.23% ±0.26% vs 1.67% ± 0.18%,0.46% ±0.18%,all P <0.01 ).The elevated expression of TFF1 increased the risk of gastric ulcer ( OR:1.365,95% CI:1.065 - 1.749,P =0.014) while the down-regulation of TFF1 significantly increased the risk of ulcerocancer ( OR:3.067,95% CI:1.391 -6.757,P =0.005).The serum levels of PG Ⅰ and PG Ⅱ in gastric ulcer group were significantly higher than that in normal control and ulcerocancer group( (150 ±27),(28 ±9) vs (121 ±22).(17 ±7),(79 ±12),(20 ± 5 )μg/L,all P < 0.01 ).The PG Ⅰ level and PGR decreased significantly in the ulcerocancer group versus normal control (both P<0.01).But there was no statistical difference in PGⅡ (P>0.05).Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that PG Ⅰ and PGR were valuable for the diagnosis of malignant gastric cancer with an area under curve of 0.975 and 0.914 respectively.Conclusions The expression of TFF1 protein increases in gastric ulcer but decreases in gastric ulcerocancer.The elevated serum levels of PG Ⅰ and PG Ⅱ indicate benign ulcer while a marked decline of serum PG Ⅰ and PGR serves as a risk signal of malignant gastric ulcer.The evaluation of expression profiles of TFF1 protein and PGs is helpful for the differentiation of benign gastric ulcer from malignant ulcerocancer.