生态学报
生態學報
생태학보
ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA
2009年
7期
3872-3881
,共10页
李巧%陈又清%陈彦林%严伟伟%王思铭
李巧%陳又清%陳彥林%嚴偉偉%王思銘
리교%진우청%진언림%엄위위%왕사명
混农林生态系统%鞘翅目%物种多度%农业土地利用%紫胶虫
混農林生態繫統%鞘翅目%物種多度%農業土地利用%紫膠蟲
혼농림생태계통%초시목%물충다도%농업토지이용%자효충
agroforestry ecosystem%Coleoptera%species-abundance%agricultural land uses%Kerria spp
在云南绿春县牛孔乡采用网扫法调查了紫胶林-农田复合生态系统(LPFE)中稻田(Ⅰ)、旱地(Ⅱ)、天然紫胶林(Ⅲ)、人工紫胶林(Ⅳ)的甲虫群落.采集标本3569号,隶属26科358种;象甲科种类最丰富,占全部种类的17.0%;瓢虫科数量最丰富,占个体总数的22.9%.虎甲科、隐翅甲科等物种数和个体数量在Ⅰ~Ⅳ中的分布没有明显差异;而叩甲科、粗角叩甲科、朽木甲科、伪叶甲科、瓢虫科、天牛科、负泥虫科、叶甲科和象甲科等有明显差异.LPFE、Ⅰ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ甲虫物种多度分布符合对数级数模型,Ⅱ符合分割线段模型.Ⅰ~Ⅳ的甲虫多样性为:Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ.指出了栖息于植物上的甲虫群落能度量不同土地利用生境的区别,不同类群的甲虫对于生境的指示作用不同:叩甲等可以指示农田和林地的差异,而朽木甲、天牛、叶甲和象甲可以用于指示天然林和人工林生境的区别.LPFE具有区域内土地利用方式多样化的特点,对维持甲虫的多样性水平具有积极作用.Ⅲ在当地生物多样性保护中具有重要作用,Ⅱ在系统中具有很低的多样性.
在雲南綠春縣牛孔鄉採用網掃法調查瞭紫膠林-農田複閤生態繫統(LPFE)中稻田(Ⅰ)、旱地(Ⅱ)、天然紫膠林(Ⅲ)、人工紫膠林(Ⅳ)的甲蟲群落.採集標本3569號,隸屬26科358種;象甲科種類最豐富,佔全部種類的17.0%;瓢蟲科數量最豐富,佔箇體總數的22.9%.虎甲科、隱翅甲科等物種數和箇體數量在Ⅰ~Ⅳ中的分佈沒有明顯差異;而叩甲科、粗角叩甲科、朽木甲科、偽葉甲科、瓢蟲科、天牛科、負泥蟲科、葉甲科和象甲科等有明顯差異.LPFE、Ⅰ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ甲蟲物種多度分佈符閤對數級數模型,Ⅱ符閤分割線段模型.Ⅰ~Ⅳ的甲蟲多樣性為:Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ.指齣瞭棲息于植物上的甲蟲群落能度量不同土地利用生境的區彆,不同類群的甲蟲對于生境的指示作用不同:叩甲等可以指示農田和林地的差異,而朽木甲、天牛、葉甲和象甲可以用于指示天然林和人工林生境的區彆.LPFE具有區域內土地利用方式多樣化的特點,對維持甲蟲的多樣性水平具有積極作用.Ⅲ在噹地生物多樣性保護中具有重要作用,Ⅱ在繫統中具有很低的多樣性.
재운남록춘현우공향채용망소법조사료자효림-농전복합생태계통(LPFE)중도전(Ⅰ)、한지(Ⅱ)、천연자효림(Ⅲ)、인공자효림(Ⅳ)적갑충군락.채집표본3569호,대속26과358충;상갑과충류최봉부,점전부충류적17.0%;표충과수량최봉부,점개체총수적22.9%.호갑과、은시갑과등물충수화개체수량재Ⅰ~Ⅳ중적분포몰유명현차이;이고갑과、조각고갑과、후목갑과、위협갑과、표충과、천우과、부니충과、협갑과화상갑과등유명현차이.LPFE、Ⅰ、Ⅲ화Ⅳ갑충물충다도분포부합대수급수모형,Ⅱ부합분할선단모형.Ⅰ~Ⅳ적갑충다양성위:Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ.지출료서식우식물상적갑충군락능도량불동토지이용생경적구별,불동류군적갑충대우생경적지시작용불동:고갑등가이지시농전화임지적차이,이후목갑、천우、협갑화상갑가이용우지시천연림화인공림생경적구별.LPFE구유구역내토지이용방식다양화적특점,대유지갑충적다양성수평구유적겁작용.Ⅲ재당지생물다양성보호중구유중요작용,Ⅱ재계통중구유흔저적다양성.
Beetle assemblages were investigated by sweep netting in paddy field (Ⅰ), dry land (Ⅱ), natural forest (Ⅲ), and plantation forest (Ⅳ) in lac-plantation-farmland ecosystem (LPFE) in Lvchun County, Yunnan Province. A total of 3569 beetles were captured, belonging to 358 species, 21 families. Among those beetles, Curculionidae has most species, comprising 17.0% of the total number, and Coccinellidae has most individuals, comprising 22.9%. For Cicindelidae, Staphylinidae, Meloidae, Nitidulidae, Lathridiidae, Cryptophagidae, Scarabaeidae, Bostrychidae, Hispidae and Scolytidae, the difference between both species and individual in Ⅰ-Ⅳ was not significant, while it was significant for Elateridae, Throscidae, Alleculidae, Lagriidae, Coccinellidae, Cerambycidae, Crioceridae, Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae. The Log-series model could well fit to the species-abundance distribution of beetle assemblages in LPFE, Ⅰ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ, and Broken-stick model could well fit to that in Ⅱ. The diversity at the species level in Ⅰ-Ⅳ was in the order: Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅱ=Ⅰ, while it was Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅱ>Ⅰ, at the family level. If the results from the species- abundance were considered, it was Ⅲ>Ⅳ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ. It was suggested that the difference between the different land-use habitats could be indicated by using plant-inhabiting beetle assemblages. Different kinds of beetle had different role in the indication, the difference between farm-land and forest could be indicated by Elateridae, Throscidae, etc. The difference between natural forest and plantation forest could be indicated by Alleculidae, Cerambycidae, Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae, and the habitat change could be found through the long time monitor to them. The land-use in LPFE was different and diverse, and it played an active role in maintaining the beetle diversity. Especially, natural forest was more important for the local biodiversity conservation, while the diversity in dry land was lower, and how to change it during the land utilization, is need to consider for managers.