CAJ | 학술논문

目的使用"系统评价和Meta分析报告规范"(preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis,PRISMA)量表评价口腔医学领域中文Meta分析的报告质量,探索影响报告质量的因素并了解国内口腔医学Meta分析的报告现状.方法计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database,CBM)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals,VIP)和中国期刊全文数据库(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,CNKI),手工检索19种中文口腔医学杂志,检索已发表的口腔医学类Meta分析.进行文献纳入、数据提取并使用PRISMA评价其报告质量,如有异议则通过讨论达成共识.结果纳入34篇Meta分析文献,以口腔内科学和口腔颌面外科学两个亚学科为主,仅涉及病因性和防治性两类Meta分析.近年来Meta分析论文发表的数量有所上升,但是报告质量普遍不高,平均得分为(13.6±4.2)分.是否发表于循证医学专业期刊(标化β=0.53,t=4.15,P<0.001)、Meta分析发表距今年限(标化β=-0.44,t=-3.28,P=0.001)是Meta分析的报告质量的主要影响因素,敏感分析显示结果较稳定.结论我国中文口腔医学Meta分析的报告质量有待提高,建议口腔医师更多地学习循证医学知识,制作口腔医学Meta分析时参考PRISMA的要求撰写.
목적 사용"계통평개화Meta분석보고규범"(preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis,PRISMA)량표평개구강의학영역중문Meta분석적보고질량,탐색영향보고질량적인소병료해국내구강의학Meta분석적보고현상.방법 계산궤검색중국생물의학문헌수거고(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database,CBM)、유보중문과기기간수거고(VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals,VIP)화중국기간전문수거고(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,CNKI),수공검색19충중문구강의학잡지,검색이발표적구강의학류Meta분석.진행문헌납입、수거제취병사용PRISMA평개기보고질량,여유이의칙통과토론체성공식.결과 납입34편Meta분석문헌,이구강내과학화구강합면외과학량개아학과위주,부섭급병인성화방치성량류Meta분석.근년래Meta분석논문발표적수량유소상승,단시보고질량보편불고,평균득분위(13.6±4.2)분.시부발표우순증의학전업기간(표화β=0.53,t=4.15,P<0.001)、Meta분석발표거금년한(표화β=-0.44,t=-3.28,P=0.001)시Meta분석적보고질량적주요영향인소,민감분석현시결과 교은정.결론 아국중문구강의학Meta분석적보고질량유대제고,건의구강의사경다지학습순증의학지식,제작구강의학Meta분석시삼고PRISMA적요구찬사.
Objective To determine the current status and influence hctors of reporting quality of the Chinese meta-analysis on stomatology.Methods A comprehensive electronic search was carried out through Chinese BioMedical Literature Database(CBM),VIP Databage for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP)and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and a hand searching was also performed through 19 stomatologieal journals in Chinese to identify meta-analysis on stomatology.Two reviewers took responsibility for study inclusion,data extraction and reporting quality assessment with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis(PRISMA)in duplicate and any disagreement was resolved by discussion.Results A total of 34 meta-analysis on stomatology were eligible,most of them were ou oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery,and mainly focusing on etiology,prevention and treatment of oral diseases.The number of the meta-analysis increased during recent years.Reporting quality of the meta-analysis was not hish and the PRISMA scored(13.6±4.2).The main factors that influenced the reporting quality of meta-analysis were published on evidence-based medicine journals(adjusted β=0.53,t=4.15,showed that this outcome was stable.Conclusions Reposing quality of the Chinese meta-analysis on stomatology is low.To provide sufficient evidence to the clinicians and promote the development of evidencebased dentistry in China,experts on stomatology should study the knowledge of evidence-based medicine and comply with PRISMA statement when producing the meta-analysis.