CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨氧化电位水联合可见光治疗仪治疗感染性压疮的疗效.方法将64例感染性压疮患者随机分为新法治疗组23例,传统治疗组21例,对照组20例.新法治疗组采用局部减压,氧化电位水清创,可见光照射20 min,10 7欠/d.传统治疗组采用局部减压,生理盐水清创,局部涂烧伤膏,3 次/d.对照组采用局部减压,生理盐水清创,每2小时翻身按摩皮肤1次.记录治愈时间与治疗效果,并进行统计分析.结果 3组之间疗效、有效率与治愈时间组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论氧化电位水联合可见光治疗仪法与传统治疗法均对治疗感染性压疮有效,但氧化电位水联合可见光治疗仪治疗法优于传统治疗法.
목적 탐토양화전위수연합가견광치료의치료감염성압창적료효.방법 장64례감염성압창환자수궤분위신법치료조23례,전통치료조21례,대조조20례.신법치료조채용국부감압,양화전위수청창,가견광조사20 min,10 7흠/d.전통치료조채용국부감압,생리염수청창,국부도소상고,3 차/d.대조조채용국부감압,생리염수청창,매2소시번신안마피부1차.기록치유시간여치료효과,병진행통계분석.결과 3조지간료효、유효솔여치유시간조간비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 양화전위수연합가견광치료의법여전통치요법균대치료감염성압창유효,단양화전위수연합가견광치료의치요법우우전통치요법.
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of visible light healing equipment and oxidation potential water in the treatment of infected bed-sore. Methods 64 cases of infected bed-sore were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 23 cases in the new treatment group, 21 in the traditional treatment group and 20 in the control group. The new treatment group received local decompression, debridement with oxidation potential water and exposure of visible light for 20min, 10 times a day. The traditional treatment group received local decompression, debridement with Ns and besmeared burn cream for 3 times a day. The control group received only local decompression and debridement with NS, and turned the body over and massaged every two hours. The healing time and the result of every therapy were recorded, and then were statistically analyzed. Results The curative effect, the efficient rate and the healing time between the three groups were compared, and their differences had statistical meaning (P < 0. 05). Conclusions The new treatment and the traditional treatment are beth effective methods to heal infected bed-sore, but the therapeutics effect of visible oxidation potential water and light heading equipment is better than that of the traditional treatment.