中华临床营养杂志
中華臨床營養雜誌
중화림상영양잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
2012年
1期
1-5
,共5页
夏鹏%蒋兰萍%陈丽萌%李雪梅
夏鵬%蔣蘭萍%陳麗萌%李雪梅
하붕%장란평%진려맹%리설매
脂蛋白a%动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄%Meta分析
脂蛋白a%動脈粥樣硬化性腎動脈狹窄%Meta分析
지단백a%동맥죽양경화성신동맥협착%Meta분석
Lipoprotein (a)%Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis%Meta analysis
目的 探讨脂蛋白a与动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)的关联性.方法 以“atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis”为检索词,检索PubMed和EMBASE数据库2010年之前的文献;以“肾动脉狭窄”与“脂蛋白”为检索词,检索万方、中国知网(CNKI)及维普数据库2010年之前的文献.根据制定的标准对文献筛选后,采用Newcastle-Ottawa量表对纳入的病例对照研究和队列研究的质量进行评价,用Review Manager 5.0软件进行荟萃分析,研究脂蛋白a与ARAS的关联性.结果 共有5篇文献符合入选标准,合计661例患者.Meta分析结果显示:病例组的脂蛋白a水平比对照组高0.0702 g/L,95%置信区间为(-0.0688,0.2092),脂蛋白a水平在病例组和对照组之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.32).结论 根据现有的研究,尚无法证实脂蛋白a水平升高与ARAS之间的关联性.
目的 探討脂蛋白a與動脈粥樣硬化性腎動脈狹窄(ARAS)的關聯性.方法 以“atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis”為檢索詞,檢索PubMed和EMBASE數據庫2010年之前的文獻;以“腎動脈狹窄”與“脂蛋白”為檢索詞,檢索萬方、中國知網(CNKI)及維普數據庫2010年之前的文獻.根據製定的標準對文獻篩選後,採用Newcastle-Ottawa量錶對納入的病例對照研究和隊列研究的質量進行評價,用Review Manager 5.0軟件進行薈萃分析,研究脂蛋白a與ARAS的關聯性.結果 共有5篇文獻符閤入選標準,閤計661例患者.Meta分析結果顯示:病例組的脂蛋白a水平比對照組高0.0702 g/L,95%置信區間為(-0.0688,0.2092),脂蛋白a水平在病例組和對照組之間的差異無統計學意義(P=0.32).結論 根據現有的研究,尚無法證實脂蛋白a水平升高與ARAS之間的關聯性.
목적 탐토지단백a여동맥죽양경화성신동맥협착(ARAS)적관련성.방법 이“atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis”위검색사,검색PubMed화EMBASE수거고2010년지전적문헌;이“신동맥협착”여“지단백”위검색사,검색만방、중국지망(CNKI)급유보수거고2010년지전적문헌.근거제정적표준대문헌사선후,채용Newcastle-Ottawa량표대납입적병례대조연구화대렬연구적질량진행평개,용Review Manager 5.0연건진행회췌분석,연구지단백a여ARAS적관련성.결과 공유5편문헌부합입선표준,합계661례환자.Meta분석결과현시:병례조적지단백a수평비대조조고0.0702 g/L,95%치신구간위(-0.0688,0.2092),지단백a수평재병례조화대조조지간적차이무통계학의의(P=0.32).결론 근거현유적연구,상무법증실지단백a수평승고여ARAS지간적관련성.
Objective To explore the relevance between lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in adults.Methods Literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE Database,using “atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis” as the search term as well as in Wanfang Database,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and Cqvip Database,using “renal artery stenosis” and “lipoprotein” as the search terms,aiming to find case-control or cohort studies published before 2010.The qualities of all the literatures enrolled were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the data from which were analyzed by the Review Manager 5.0 software.Results Five eligible case-control studies (661 cases) entered the Meta analysis.The results showed that the lipoprotein(a) level was not significantly higher in the case group than that in the control group [ mean difference =0.0702 g/L,95% CI ( - 0.0688,0.2092),P =0.32 ].Conclusion According to the existing studies,the relevance between lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis can not be established.