国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2010年
8期
1201-1203
,共3页
车平杰%徐金美%康洁%邢庆华%赛海芳%宋爱华
車平傑%徐金美%康潔%邢慶華%賽海芳%宋愛華
차평걸%서금미%강길%형경화%새해방%송애화
医院感染%规范化精细管理%质量
醫院感染%規範化精細管理%質量
의원감염%규범화정세관리%질량
Nosocomial infection%Fine management of standardized%Quality
目的 观察规范化精细管理对提高医院感染管理质量的效果.方法 2008年开展规范化精细管理的监测资料为观察组,包括医院感染率、医院感染病例漏报率、感染病例标本送检率、抗生素使用率、消毒液浓度合格率、环境卫生学监测合格率.2007年的监测资料设为对照组.结果 两组监测资料经过x2检验,差别均有统计学意义,可以认为观察组的医院感染发病率(x2=3.94,P<0.05)、漏报率(x2=4.09,P<0.05)、抗生素使用率(x2=20.51,P<0.01)均低于对照组,而感染病例标本送检率(x2=3.89,P<0.05)、消毒液浓度合格率(x2=3.92,P<0.05)、环境卫生学监测合格率(x2=97.56,P<0.005)均高于对照组.结论 规范化精细管理降低了医院感染的发病率及其风险,提高了医院感染的管理质量.
目的 觀察規範化精細管理對提高醫院感染管理質量的效果.方法 2008年開展規範化精細管理的鑑測資料為觀察組,包括醫院感染率、醫院感染病例漏報率、感染病例標本送檢率、抗生素使用率、消毒液濃度閤格率、環境衛生學鑑測閤格率.2007年的鑑測資料設為對照組.結果 兩組鑑測資料經過x2檢驗,差彆均有統計學意義,可以認為觀察組的醫院感染髮病率(x2=3.94,P<0.05)、漏報率(x2=4.09,P<0.05)、抗生素使用率(x2=20.51,P<0.01)均低于對照組,而感染病例標本送檢率(x2=3.89,P<0.05)、消毒液濃度閤格率(x2=3.92,P<0.05)、環境衛生學鑑測閤格率(x2=97.56,P<0.005)均高于對照組.結論 規範化精細管理降低瞭醫院感染的髮病率及其風險,提高瞭醫院感染的管理質量.
목적 관찰규범화정세관리대제고의원감염관리질량적효과.방법 2008년개전규범화정세관리적감측자료위관찰조,포괄의원감염솔、의원감염병례루보솔、감염병례표본송검솔、항생소사용솔、소독액농도합격솔、배경위생학감측합격솔.2007년적감측자료설위대조조.결과 량조감측자료경과x2검험,차별균유통계학의의,가이인위관찰조적의원감염발병솔(x2=3.94,P<0.05)、루보솔(x2=4.09,P<0.05)、항생소사용솔(x2=20.51,P<0.01)균저우대조조,이감염병례표본송검솔(x2=3.89,P<0.05)、소독액농도합격솔(x2=3.92,P<0.05)、배경위생학감측합격솔(x2=97.56,P<0.005)균고우대조조.결론 규범화정세관리강저료의원감염적발병솔급기풍험,제고료의원감염적관리질량.
Objective To observe the fine management of standardizing to improve the quality of management of hospital infection. Methods In fine management of standardizing in 2008, the monitoring data was for the observation group including nosocomial infection rate, hospital infections rate of fail, rate of censorship specimens infections, antibiotics usage rate, disinfection concentration qualified rate, and environmental hygiene monitoring qualified rate. In 2007, the monitoring data was set as control group. Results Two groups data afterx2 teat monitoring, the differences were statistically significant, it showed that the observation group of hospital infection rates (x2 =3.94, P<0.05), and rate of fail (x2 =4.09, P<0.05), antibiotic usage (x2 =20.51, P<0.01), were lower than those of control group. And all the while infections specimen inspection rate (x2 = 3. 89, P < 0. 05 ), and disinfection concentration qualified rate (x2 =3.92, P<0.05), and environmental hygiene monitoring qualified rate (x2 = 97. 56, P < 0.005), were higher than those of control group. Conclusions The fine management of standardized can decrease hospital infection rates and reduce risks of hospital infection, improve the quality of management of hospital infection.