中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
2008年
z1期
74-76
,共3页
黎玮%钟海星%齐进春%国平英%刘凯隆
黎瑋%鐘海星%齊進春%國平英%劉凱隆
려위%종해성%제진춘%국평영%류개륭
无张力尿道悬吊带术%无张力尿道吊带术-闭孔系统%压力性尿失禁%Meta分析%随机对照实验
無張力尿道懸弔帶術%無張力尿道弔帶術-閉孔繫統%壓力性尿失禁%Meta分析%隨機對照實驗
무장력뇨도현조대술%무장력뇨도조대술-폐공계통%압력성뇨실금%Meta분석%수궤대조실험
Tension-free vaginal tape%Tension-free vaginal tape obturator tape%Urinary stress incontinence%Meta analysis%Randomized controlled trial
目的 评估无张力尿道悬吊带术(TVT)及无张力尿道吊带术-闭孔系统(TVT-O)治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的疗效.方法 以"TVT,TVT-O,TOT,SUI,RCT"及"无张力尿道中段吊带术,经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术,压力性尿失禁"等为检索词,在MEDLINE,PUBMED,EMBASE,Google Scholar,CNKI,万方数据库检索2001年1月至2007年3月,国内外公开发表的中英文关于TVT及TVT-O手术疗效及其并发症的研究文献,选取其中病例数>30例的随机对照实验进行Meta综合定量分析,根据固定效应模型和随机效应模型计算结果的一致程度及失效安全系数进行敏感性分析.结果共有6篇文献入选,TVT及TVT-O术后1~17个月的疗效差异无统计学意义(OR=0.67;95%CI 0.40,1.13).TVT-O术膀胱损伤(OR=0.15;95% CI 0.03,0.66)的发生率低于TVT,而术后疼痛(OR=8.61;95% CI 3.03,24.52)的发生率高于TVT,其他并发症如术后尿急(OR=1.16;95% CI 0.54,2.47)、尿潴留(OR=0.54;95% CI 0.24,1.20)、尿路感染(OR=1.07;95% CI 0.61,1.87)的发生率均差异无统计学意义.结论 TVT和TVT-O两种术式的疗效相近,而术后并发症,TVT-O组未报道膀胱穿孔的发生,但术后疼痛多见,其他并发症的发生率没有明显差异.
目的 評估無張力尿道懸弔帶術(TVT)及無張力尿道弔帶術-閉孔繫統(TVT-O)治療壓力性尿失禁(SUI)的療效.方法 以"TVT,TVT-O,TOT,SUI,RCT"及"無張力尿道中段弔帶術,經閉孔無張力尿道中段弔帶術,壓力性尿失禁"等為檢索詞,在MEDLINE,PUBMED,EMBASE,Google Scholar,CNKI,萬方數據庫檢索2001年1月至2007年3月,國內外公開髮錶的中英文關于TVT及TVT-O手術療效及其併髮癥的研究文獻,選取其中病例數>30例的隨機對照實驗進行Meta綜閤定量分析,根據固定效應模型和隨機效應模型計算結果的一緻程度及失效安全繫數進行敏感性分析.結果共有6篇文獻入選,TVT及TVT-O術後1~17箇月的療效差異無統計學意義(OR=0.67;95%CI 0.40,1.13).TVT-O術膀胱損傷(OR=0.15;95% CI 0.03,0.66)的髮生率低于TVT,而術後疼痛(OR=8.61;95% CI 3.03,24.52)的髮生率高于TVT,其他併髮癥如術後尿急(OR=1.16;95% CI 0.54,2.47)、尿潴留(OR=0.54;95% CI 0.24,1.20)、尿路感染(OR=1.07;95% CI 0.61,1.87)的髮生率均差異無統計學意義.結論 TVT和TVT-O兩種術式的療效相近,而術後併髮癥,TVT-O組未報道膀胱穿孔的髮生,但術後疼痛多見,其他併髮癥的髮生率沒有明顯差異.
목적 평고무장력뇨도현조대술(TVT)급무장력뇨도조대술-폐공계통(TVT-O)치료압력성뇨실금(SUI)적료효.방법 이"TVT,TVT-O,TOT,SUI,RCT"급"무장력뇨도중단조대술,경폐공무장력뇨도중단조대술,압력성뇨실금"등위검색사,재MEDLINE,PUBMED,EMBASE,Google Scholar,CNKI,만방수거고검색2001년1월지2007년3월,국내외공개발표적중영문관우TVT급TVT-O수술료효급기병발증적연구문헌,선취기중병례수>30례적수궤대조실험진행Meta종합정량분석,근거고정효응모형화수궤효응모형계산결과적일치정도급실효안전계수진행민감성분석.결과공유6편문헌입선,TVT급TVT-O술후1~17개월적료효차이무통계학의의(OR=0.67;95%CI 0.40,1.13).TVT-O술방광손상(OR=0.15;95% CI 0.03,0.66)적발생솔저우TVT,이술후동통(OR=8.61;95% CI 3.03,24.52)적발생솔고우TVT,기타병발증여술후뇨급(OR=1.16;95% CI 0.54,2.47)、뇨저류(OR=0.54;95% CI 0.24,1.20)、뇨로감염(OR=1.07;95% CI 0.61,1.87)적발생솔균차이무통계학의의.결론 TVT화TVT-O량충술식적료효상근,이술후병발증,TVT-O조미보도방광천공적발생,단술후동통다견,기타병발증적발생솔몰유명현차이.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape obturator tape(TVT-O)as treatment of SUI by means of a systematic review and meta analysis.Methods Using the search terms"TVT,TVT-O,SUI,RCT,TOT",the literature in Chinese and English from January 2001 tO March 2007 on the difference of TVT and TVT-O was searched from MEDLINE,PUBMED,EMBASE,Google Scholar,CNKI,WAN FANG DATA,and criteria randomized controlled trials(RCTs)were studied by Meta-analysis in RevMan 4.2.At the same time,Ors of randomized model and fixed model were calculated tO evaluate the sensitivity.Results There were six RCTs that compared TVT-O with TVT.When compared by Subjective cure,TVT-O at 1-17 months were no better than TVT(OR 0.67;95% CI 0.40,1.13).Adverse events such as bladder injuries (OR 0.15;95% CI 0.03,0.66)was less common,where as groin/thigh pain(OR 8.61;95% CI3.03,24.52)was more common;but there were rio significant difference in de novo urgency(OR=1.16;95% CI 0.54,2.47),urinary retention(OR=0.54;95% CI 0.24,1.20)or urinary tract infection(OR=1.07;95% CI 0.61,1.87)between the tWO groups.Conclusions There is no significant difference between TVT and TVT-O.TVT-O group had no bladder injuries complications,but groin/thigh pain was more common.