中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2009年
10期
1073-1077
,共5页
胡政%李想%冯茂辉%储君君%谢伟
鬍政%李想%馮茂輝%儲君君%謝偉
호정%리상%풍무휘%저군군%사위
乳腺肿瘤%风险因子%评估与预测%数学模型
乳腺腫瘤%風險因子%評估與預測%數學模型
유선종류%풍험인자%평고여예측%수학모형
Breast neoplasms%Risk factor%Assessment and prediction%Mathematical model
乳腺癌风险评估与预测可以帮助临床医生评估采取预防性化疗或手术的必要性,并指导受试者的口常生活,达到减小患乳腺癌风险的目的.Gail、Claus、BRCAPRO和Cuzick-Tyrer模型是常见的4种风险评估模型.文章对上述4种模型的建立、使用、优缺点及应用范围进行论述,并使用各模型对一名有乳腺癌家族史的受试者进行风险评估;各模型预测结果差异有统计学意义;到45岁,以上4种模型预测值及人群平均累积发病概率分别为1.9%、11.8%、2.5%、5.0%和1.6%;而到75岁,分别为20.2%、32.5%、13.1%、25.0%和8.5%,受试者有较高的乳腺癌发病风险.新模犁的建立需要综合考虑各方面重要的风险因子,并进行大规模人群的验证研究.
乳腺癌風險評估與預測可以幫助臨床醫生評估採取預防性化療或手術的必要性,併指導受試者的口常生活,達到減小患乳腺癌風險的目的.Gail、Claus、BRCAPRO和Cuzick-Tyrer模型是常見的4種風險評估模型.文章對上述4種模型的建立、使用、優缺點及應用範圍進行論述,併使用各模型對一名有乳腺癌傢族史的受試者進行風險評估;各模型預測結果差異有統計學意義;到45歲,以上4種模型預測值及人群平均纍積髮病概率分彆為1.9%、11.8%、2.5%、5.0%和1.6%;而到75歲,分彆為20.2%、32.5%、13.1%、25.0%和8.5%,受試者有較高的乳腺癌髮病風險.新模犛的建立需要綜閤攷慮各方麵重要的風險因子,併進行大規模人群的驗證研究.
유선암풍험평고여예측가이방조림상의생평고채취예방성화료혹수술적필요성,병지도수시자적구상생활,체도감소환유선암풍험적목적.Gail、Claus、BRCAPRO화Cuzick-Tyrer모형시상견적4충풍험평고모형.문장대상술4충모형적건립、사용、우결점급응용범위진행논술,병사용각모형대일명유유선암가족사적수시자진행풍험평고;각모형예측결과차이유통계학의의;도45세,이상4충모형예측치급인군평균루적발병개솔분별위1.9%、11.8%、2.5%、5.0%화1.6%;이도75세,분별위20.2%、32.5%、13.1%、25.0%화8.5%,수시자유교고적유선암발병풍험.신모리적건립수요종합고필각방면중요적풍험인자,병진행대규모인군적험증연구.
In the areas of prevention and life skills counseling for breast cancer, risk assessment and prediction can assist clinicians to decide if chemoprevention or prophylactic surgery is needed or suggestions on improving the quality of life for their clients. Several mathematical models, namely Gail Model, Claus Model, BRCAPRO Model and Cuzick-Tyrer Model etc. have been developed to make predictions, clinically. This paper has reviewed the development, operation, advantage versus disadvantage and areas of application for the four models. Having family history of breast cancer, one subject was calculated on the risks by the four models and different results were found. Up to 45 years old, the accumulative risks from the four models and population risk were 1.9%, 11.8%, 2.5%, 5.0% and i.6%, respectively. To 75 years old, they were 20.2%,32.5%, 13.1%, 25.0% and 8.5%, respectively. The subject had a relatively high breast cancer risk during her lifetime. A new model is supposed to include a variety of important risk factors and to be validated by large scale of case-control samples. Incidence of breast cancer in China had significantly increased during the last ten years, but the research on developing assessment methods of breast cancer risk had never been reported, suggesting that the development of models for Chinese population is necessary.