中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2010年
32期
3874-3876
,共3页
刘凌云%覃杰%周小香%赖丽莎%谢斯栋%王劲%陈妙霞
劉凌雲%覃傑%週小香%賴麗莎%謝斯棟%王勁%陳妙霞
류릉운%담걸%주소향%뢰려사%사사동%왕경%진묘하
CT%肝脏灌注%CT峰值%注射速率%对比剂浓度%护理
CT%肝髒灌註%CT峰值%註射速率%對比劑濃度%護理
CT%간장관주%CT봉치%주사속솔%대비제농도%호리
CT%Liver perfusion%CT peak%Injection rate%Concentrations of contrast agent%Nursing
目的 比较肝脏灌注检查中两种不同对比剂浓度和两种不同注射速率对肝动脉CT显影效果的影响,并分析护理影响因素.方法 104例患者,分别用欧乃派克350和优维显370,再随机分两小组不同流率:4 ml/s和6 ml/s的注射速率进行320排CT肝脏灌注检查,检测肝动脉CT峰值和血管重建图像质量;总结护理影响因素.结果 欧乃派克350与优维显370的肝动脉CT峰值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);4 ml/s注射速率肝动脉CT峰值低于6 ml/s的注射速率肝动脉CT峰值,两者之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 320排CT肝脏灌注检查中不同对比剂浓度和注射速率对肝动脉显影及图像质量的对比中,高浓度及高注射速率在肝动脉灌注中CT值及图像质量达到3级以上,良好的护理措施能解除影响图像质量的因素,也大大提高了图像质量和检查成功率.
目的 比較肝髒灌註檢查中兩種不同對比劑濃度和兩種不同註射速率對肝動脈CT顯影效果的影響,併分析護理影響因素.方法 104例患者,分彆用歐迺派剋350和優維顯370,再隨機分兩小組不同流率:4 ml/s和6 ml/s的註射速率進行320排CT肝髒灌註檢查,檢測肝動脈CT峰值和血管重建圖像質量;總結護理影響因素.結果 歐迺派剋350與優維顯370的肝動脈CT峰值差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01);4 ml/s註射速率肝動脈CT峰值低于6 ml/s的註射速率肝動脈CT峰值,兩者之間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01).結論 320排CT肝髒灌註檢查中不同對比劑濃度和註射速率對肝動脈顯影及圖像質量的對比中,高濃度及高註射速率在肝動脈灌註中CT值及圖像質量達到3級以上,良好的護理措施能解除影響圖像質量的因素,也大大提高瞭圖像質量和檢查成功率.
목적 비교간장관주검사중량충불동대비제농도화량충불동주사속솔대간동맥CT현영효과적영향,병분석호리영향인소.방법 104례환자,분별용구내파극350화우유현370,재수궤분량소조불동류솔:4 ml/s화6 ml/s적주사속솔진행320배CT간장관주검사,검측간동맥CT봉치화혈관중건도상질량;총결호리영향인소.결과 구내파극350여우유현370적간동맥CT봉치차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01);4 ml/s주사속솔간동맥CT봉치저우6 ml/s적주사속솔간동맥CT봉치,량자지간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01).결론 320배CT간장관주검사중불동대비제농도화주사속솔대간동맥현영급도상질량적대비중,고농도급고주사속솔재간동맥관주중CT치급도상질량체도3급이상,량호적호리조시능해제영향도상질량적인소,야대대제고료도상질량화검사성공솔.
Objective To evaluate the effect of hepatic artery angiography on liver perfusion using two contrast agent with different concentrations and injection rates and analysed the nursing factors. Methods 104 patients underwent liver perfusion examination by 320 slices CT with Omnipaque 350 and Ultravist 370 contrast agent, and then they were respectively divided into two groups based on different injection rates (4, 6ml/s).Hepatic artery CT peak value and vascular reconstruction image quality were evaluated; care factors were summarized. Results There were significant differences in liver perfusion between Omnipaque 350 and Ultravist 370 contrast agent (P <0. 01). The hepatic artery CT peak value with 4 ml/s injection rate was significantly smaller than that with 6ml/s. Conclusions The hepatic artery CT peak value and vascular reconstruction image quality with high injection rate and contrast agent concentration in liver perfusion examination by 320 slices CT arrive 3 class or above. Good nursing measures will improve image quality and success rate of examination.