中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2011年
7期
735-738
,共4页
张振华%耿燕%孙清秀%顾艳枝
張振華%耿燕%孫清秀%顧豔枝
장진화%경연%손청수%고염지
糖尿病视网膜病变%认知度%影响因素%多元线性回归
糖尿病視網膜病變%認知度%影響因素%多元線性迴歸
당뇨병시망막병변%인지도%영향인소%다원선성회귀
Diabetic retinopathy%Awareness%Influencing factors%Multiple linear regression analysis
目的 调查438名眼科医师对糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)知识的认知度及影响因素.方法 采用自行设计的调查问卷,选择参加第几届国际眼科学学术会议的山东地区眼科医师以及部分青岛市眼科医师共438名作为研究人群,采用t检验、方差分析及多元线性回归方法进行统计学分析,对其DR知识认知度及影响因素和影响程度进行研究.结果 (1)438名眼科医师"DR知识答卷"平均得分(43.15±21.31)分,其中最高分100分,最低分20分;(2)单因素X2分析后得出医院级别、学历、职称、是否培训这4个因素影响眼科医师对DR知识的认知度(P<0.05);(3)多元线性回归分析排除混杂因素后,筛选出对其认知度有显著性影响的2个因素为职称和学历,职称越高,得分越高(P<0.01);学历越高,得分越高(P<0.01).结论 眼科医师对DR相关知识的认知度低,亟待建立一种正规专业的培训机制,来提高眼科医师,尤其是低年资、低学历人员的DR认知水平.
目的 調查438名眼科醫師對糖尿病視網膜病變(DR)知識的認知度及影響因素.方法 採用自行設計的調查問捲,選擇參加第幾屆國際眼科學學術會議的山東地區眼科醫師以及部分青島市眼科醫師共438名作為研究人群,採用t檢驗、方差分析及多元線性迴歸方法進行統計學分析,對其DR知識認知度及影響因素和影響程度進行研究.結果 (1)438名眼科醫師"DR知識答捲"平均得分(43.15±21.31)分,其中最高分100分,最低分20分;(2)單因素X2分析後得齣醫院級彆、學歷、職稱、是否培訓這4箇因素影響眼科醫師對DR知識的認知度(P<0.05);(3)多元線性迴歸分析排除混雜因素後,篩選齣對其認知度有顯著性影響的2箇因素為職稱和學歷,職稱越高,得分越高(P<0.01);學歷越高,得分越高(P<0.01).結論 眼科醫師對DR相關知識的認知度低,亟待建立一種正規專業的培訓機製,來提高眼科醫師,尤其是低年資、低學歷人員的DR認知水平.
목적 조사438명안과의사대당뇨병시망막병변(DR)지식적인지도급영향인소.방법 채용자행설계적조사문권,선택삼가제궤계국제안과학학술회의적산동지구안과의사이급부분청도시안과의사공438명작위연구인군,채용t검험、방차분석급다원선성회귀방법진행통계학분석,대기DR지식인지도급영향인소화영향정도진행연구.결과 (1)438명안과의사"DR지식답권"평균득분(43.15±21.31)분,기중최고분100분,최저분20분;(2)단인소X2분석후득출의원급별、학력、직칭、시부배훈저4개인소영향안과의사대DR지식적인지도(P<0.05);(3)다원선성회귀분석배제혼잡인소후,사선출대기인지도유현저성영향적2개인소위직칭화학력,직칭월고,득분월고(P<0.01);학력월고,득분월고(P<0.01).결론 안과의사대DR상관지식적인지도저,극대건립일충정규전업적배훈궤제,래제고안과의사,우기시저년자、저학력인원적DR인지수평.
Objective To investigate the awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and influencing factors in 438 ophthalmologists. Methods A self-designed questionnaire was made. We selected the ophthalmologists from Shandong province to participate in the Ninth International Conference on ophthalmology or working in Qingdao City in a total of 438 as the study population, using t test, variance analysis and multiple linear regression statistical analysis. Their DR knowledge awareness, influencing factors and the extent was under research. Results The average score of "DR knowledge of respondents" of them were (43.15±21.31). The highest score was 100 points, lowest score 20 points.Following an analysis of variance, four factors on ophthalmologists of knowledge awareness of DR was statistically significant (P<0.05), which were hospital level, education, job title, whether or not training. Under multiple linear regression analysis, excluding confounding factors, only job title and qualifications knowledge affect ophthalmologist DR recognition: higher title higher score (P <0.01);more education higher score (P<0.01). Conclusions The DR related knowledge of ophthalmologists is poor. It is urgent to establish a formal, specialized knowledge training systems for DR, especially focus on those low titles and low academic ophthalmologist.