中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2010年
4期
36-38
,共3页
刘艳玲%杨绮莉%王耀兰%黎穗
劉豔玲%楊綺莉%王耀蘭%黎穗
류염령%양기리%왕요란%려수
手消毒%爱护佳%依从性
手消毒%愛護佳%依從性
수소독%애호가%의종성
Hand prepping%Avagard%Compliance
目的 比较3M公司生产的2种爱护佳手消毒液在外科手消毒中的应用效果.方法 将参加手术的医护人员随机分为实验组121例和对照组116例.实验组的手消毒采用揉搓法,手消毒液为9200+9230.对照组的手消毒采用刷手法,消毒液为9241-D+9250.比较2组手消毒效果.结果 2组手消毒效果比较无显著差异,但揉搓法更加人性化,操作者的依从性更高.结论 在外科手消毒时建议使用9200+9230手消毒液揉搓消毒的方法.
目的 比較3M公司生產的2種愛護佳手消毒液在外科手消毒中的應用效果.方法 將參加手術的醫護人員隨機分為實驗組121例和對照組116例.實驗組的手消毒採用揉搓法,手消毒液為9200+9230.對照組的手消毒採用刷手法,消毒液為9241-D+9250.比較2組手消毒效果.結果 2組手消毒效果比較無顯著差異,但揉搓法更加人性化,操作者的依從性更高.結論 在外科手消毒時建議使用9200+9230手消毒液揉搓消毒的方法.
목적 비교3M공사생산적2충애호가수소독액재외과수소독중적응용효과.방법 장삼가수술적의호인원수궤분위실험조121례화대조조116례.실험조적수소독채용유차법,수소독액위9200+9230.대조조적수소독채용쇄수법,소독액위9241-D+9250.비교2조수소독효과.결과 2조수소독효과비교무현저차이,단유차법경가인성화,조작자적의종성경고.결론 재외과수소독시건의사용9200+9230수소독액유차소독적방법.
Objective To know the application effects of two different hand prepping by avagard before the operation.Methods Divided operation-actors into the experimental group (121 cases) and the control group (116 cases)randomly.Kneading hand prepping by 9200 and 9230 avagard was used in the experimental group, while the brushing by 9241- D and 9250 was used in the control group.Compared the effects between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference about disinfection effects between the two groups, while the compliance of kneading hand prepping was more better than the other hand prepping method.Condusions Kneading hand prepping by avagard 9200 should be used before surgical operation.