中国心理卫生杂志
中國心理衛生雜誌
중국심리위생잡지
CHINESE MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
2009年
11期
824-827,831
,共5页
于亮%孙月吉%阎楠%林媛%李倩%宛思莹%郇明明
于亮%孫月吉%閻楠%林媛%李倩%宛思瑩%郇明明
우량%손월길%염남%림원%리천%완사형%순명명
创造思维%创造思维测验%聋儿%手语%对照研究
創造思維%創造思維測驗%聾兒%手語%對照研究
창조사유%창조사유측험%롱인%수어%대조연구
creative thinking%creativity test%deaf children%sign language%control study
目的:了解聋儿与正常儿童创造思维能力的差异,探讨相关因素对聋儿创造思维能力的影响.方法:在沈阳和大连两地,方便选取4所特殊教育学校,随机抽取年龄8~16周岁的听力残疾学生122名;方便选取2所普通小学和2所普通中学,随机抽取年龄8~16周岁正常听力学生122名.用新编创造思考测验和瑞文测验联合型进行测试.结果:①聋儿组的语文流畅力、语文变通力、语文独创力、图形变通力得分及IQ值均低于正常儿童组[如,IQ值(101.05±1.196)vs.(105.01±1.102),P=0.030],而图形精进力得分高于正常儿童组[(3.24±0.40)vs.(1.96±0.22),P=0.006].②聋儿语文流畅力、语文独创力均与年龄呈正相关(β=0.310,0.301;P<0.001或0.01),语文变通力与双语教育年限呈正相关(β=0.308,P<0.001),图形流畅力、图形变通力、图形独创力、图形精进力均与手语使用年限呈正相关(β=0.321,0.308,0.228,0.456;P<0.01或0.05).结论:聋儿的语文创造思维能力和图形变通力差于正常儿童,图形精进力好于正常儿童,而图形流畅力、独创力与正常儿童无差异;手语是聋儿图形创造思维能力的主要相关因素.
目的:瞭解聾兒與正常兒童創造思維能力的差異,探討相關因素對聾兒創造思維能力的影響.方法:在瀋暘和大連兩地,方便選取4所特殊教育學校,隨機抽取年齡8~16週歲的聽力殘疾學生122名;方便選取2所普通小學和2所普通中學,隨機抽取年齡8~16週歲正常聽力學生122名.用新編創造思攷測驗和瑞文測驗聯閤型進行測試.結果:①聾兒組的語文流暢力、語文變通力、語文獨創力、圖形變通力得分及IQ值均低于正常兒童組[如,IQ值(101.05±1.196)vs.(105.01±1.102),P=0.030],而圖形精進力得分高于正常兒童組[(3.24±0.40)vs.(1.96±0.22),P=0.006].②聾兒語文流暢力、語文獨創力均與年齡呈正相關(β=0.310,0.301;P<0.001或0.01),語文變通力與雙語教育年限呈正相關(β=0.308,P<0.001),圖形流暢力、圖形變通力、圖形獨創力、圖形精進力均與手語使用年限呈正相關(β=0.321,0.308,0.228,0.456;P<0.01或0.05).結論:聾兒的語文創造思維能力和圖形變通力差于正常兒童,圖形精進力好于正常兒童,而圖形流暢力、獨創力與正常兒童無差異;手語是聾兒圖形創造思維能力的主要相關因素.
목적:료해롱인여정상인동창조사유능력적차이,탐토상관인소대롱인창조사유능력적영향.방법:재침양화대련량지,방편선취4소특수교육학교,수궤추취년령8~16주세적은력잔질학생122명;방편선취2소보통소학화2소보통중학,수궤추취년령8~16주세정상은역학생122명.용신편창조사고측험화서문측험연합형진행측시.결과:①롱인조적어문류창력、어문변통력、어문독창력、도형변통력득분급IQ치균저우정상인동조[여,IQ치(101.05±1.196)vs.(105.01±1.102),P=0.030],이도형정진력득분고우정상인동조[(3.24±0.40)vs.(1.96±0.22),P=0.006].②롱인어문류창력、어문독창력균여년령정정상관(β=0.310,0.301;P<0.001혹0.01),어문변통력여쌍어교육년한정정상관(β=0.308,P<0.001),도형류창력、도형변통력、도형독창력、도형정진력균여수어사용년한정정상관(β=0.321,0.308,0.228,0.456;P<0.01혹0.05).결론:롱인적어문창조사유능력화도형변통력차우정상인동,도형정진력호우정상인동,이도형류창력、독창력여정상인동무차이;수어시롱인도형창조사유능력적주요상관인소.
Objective:To explore the difference in creative thinking and the related factors between deaf children and normal children.Methods:Observation group(n=122)with the hearing disability students were selected from 4 special education schools.Control group(n=122)was come from 2 ordinary primary schools and 2 ordinary middle schools.The two groups were given both the New Creativity Test and the Combined Raven's Test.Results:(1)Deaf children got lower scores than normal children in verbal fluency[(7.76±0.75)vs.(12.98±0.59),P<0.001],verbal flexibility[(4.28±0.33)vs.(7.87±0.28),P<0.001],verbal originality [(7.16±0.89)vs.(11.35±0.72),P<0.001],figural flexibility[(9.69±0.35)vs.(11.10±0.31),P=0.003]and IQ[(101.05±1.196)vs.(105.01±1.102),P=0.030].Deaf children got higher scores than normal children in figural elaboration[(3.24±0.40)vs.(1.96±0.22),P=0.006].There was no significant difference in fluency and originality of figural task between the two groups.(2)Deaf children's scores of verbal fluency and verbal originality were positively correlated with their age(β=0.310,0.301;Ps<0.01).Deaf children's scores of verbal flexibility were positively correlated with length of bilingual education(β=0.308,P<0.001).Deaf children's scores of figural fluency,figural flexibility,figural originalityand figural elaboration were correlated positively with their age of sign language(β=0.321,0.308,0.228,0.456;Ps<0.05).Conclusions:(1)Deaf children are lower than normal children in verbal fluency,verbal flexibility,verbal originality,figural flexibility,and are higher in figural elaboration.There is no difference in figural fluency and originality between them.(2)Sign language is a major related factor to deaf children's figural creative thinking.