CAJ | 학술논문

目的应用文献计量学方法对比分析全球以"循证"冠名的一次文献期刊2009年发表文献情况,为以后循证研究、期刊建设等提供参考.方法电子检索全球以"循证"冠名的一次文献期刊,通过期刊网站及引文数据库收集其影响因子、文献点击、下载及被引频次,计算并比较分析其即年指标、篇均下载、被引频次、下载及被引用文献的分布情况.结果共检出5种英文和4种中文以"循证"冠名的期刊,其中2种英文无法收集相关数据,故最终纳入7种期刊.①被引频次:<Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine>和<Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing>被SCI收录,影响因子均超过1,分列其同类期刊的第5位和第13位,且即年指标约为中文期刊的7倍(平均约0.2 vs 0.03).中文期刊中<中国循证儿科杂志>影响因子最高(0.946),列同类期刊的第23位,<中国循证医学杂志>即年指标最高(0.07).②下载频次:<Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine>的数据库篇均下载频次远高于其他期刊(约72 vs 23);而免费提供全文下载的<中国循证医学杂志>和<中国循证儿科杂志>篇均下载频次约为前者的5～6倍;③载文量:载文量最多的<中国循证医学杂志>的影响因子为0.685,其篇均下载频次和即年指标居中文期刊之首,而影响因子最高的2种英文期刊载文量最少.提示载文量与期刊影响因子并无直接联系.结论 "循证"冠名的英文期刊影响力高于中文期刊;建有免费下载网站的<中国循证医学杂志>和<中国循证儿科杂志>的影响力高于其它中文期刊;提示期刊组稿应从读者需求出发,采用在线出版、开放存取等形式来提高期刊影响力.
목적 응용문헌계량학방법대비분석전구이"순증"관명적일차문헌기간2009년발표문헌정황,위이후순증연구、기간건설등제공삼고.방법 전자검색전구이"순증"관명적일차문헌기간,통과기간망참급인문수거고수집기영향인자、문헌점격、하재급피인빈차,계산병비교분석기즉년지표、편균하재、피인빈차、하재급피인용문헌적분포정황.결과 공검출5충영문화4충중문이"순증"관명적기간,기중2충영문무법수집상관수거,고최종납입7충기간.①피인빈차:<Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine>화<Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing>피SCI수록,영향인자균초과1,분렬기동류기간적제5위화제13위,차즉년지표약위중문기간적7배(평균약0.2 vs 0.03).중문기간중<중국순증인과잡지>영향인자최고(0.946),렬동류기간적제23위,<중국순증의학잡지>즉년지표최고(0.07).②하재빈차:<Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine>적수거고편균하재빈차원고우기타기간(약72 vs 23);이면비제공전문하재적<중국순증의학잡지>화<중국순증인과잡지>편균하재빈차약위전자적5～6배;③재문량:재문량최다적<중국순증의학잡지>적영향인자위0.685,기편균하재빈차화즉년지표거중문기간지수,이영향인자최고적2충영문기간재문량최소.제시재문량여기간영향인자병무직접련계.결론 "순증"관명적영문기간영향력고우중문기간;건유면비하재망참적<중국순증의학잡지>화<중국순증인과잡지>적영향력고우기타중문기간;제시기간조고응종독자수구출발,채용재선출판、개방존취등형식래제고기간영향력.
Objective To compare articles published in global primary journals titled "evidence-based" via bibliometric analysis in order to provide suggestion for evidence-based research and development of related journals. Methods We searched electronic databases to retrieve global primary journals titled "evidence-based', and collected their impact factors, article click, download and citation frequency through the journal's website and related citation databases. Results Three English and 4 Chinese primary journals tided "evidence-based" met the indusion criteria. (1) were indexed by SCI with impact factor over 1 (Sth and 13th in relevant subject category), and their immediacy index was about 7 times as much as that of Chinese journals (0.2 vs 0.03). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics (CJEBP) had the highest impact factor among 4 Chinese journals (0.946, 23rd in the relevant subject category), while Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine had the highest immediacy index with 0.07; (2) Download frequency: Journal of Evidence-based Medicine (JEBM) had the highest download frequency per article in database (72 vs 23), but the website download frequencies per artide of CJEBM and CIEBP were about 5 to 6 times as much as that of database; (3) Number of articles published: Two English journals published the fewest articles but with the highest impact factors. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine had the 2nd highest impact factor although published the most articles, as well as the highest download frequency and immediacy index among the 4 Chinese journals. It suggested that there was no direct relationship between the number of the published articles and the impact factor of a journal. Conclusion The impact of English journals is better than that of Chinese journals. CJEBM and CJEBP are the top 2 ones among the Chinese journals with open access wehsites. The selection of articles should be driven by readers' demand, and the impact of journals could be improved by online publication with open access.