中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2009年
6期
581-583
,共3页
李建平%郑敏%满晓飞%夏文清%陈薇
李建平%鄭敏%滿曉飛%夏文清%陳薇
리건평%정민%만효비%하문청%진미
白内障%双手操作%超声乳化%晶状体
白內障%雙手操作%超聲乳化%晶狀體
백내장%쌍수조작%초성유화%정상체
Cataract%Bimanual%Phaeoemulsification%Lens
目的 对Bimanual微切口白内障摘除技术及可行性进行研究和探讨,客观评价其临床疗效.方法 对Bimanual(双手操作)微切121超声乳化(A组),观察超声能量、乳化时间和术后散光,并与常规超声乳化手术(B组)进行比较.结果 A组超声能量和乳化时间:核硬度为Ⅱ级者平均应用能量3.9%、平均乳化时间为(0.56±0.40)min;Ⅲ级核者平均应用能量8.3%、平均乳化时间为(0.65±0.58);Ⅳ级核者平均应用能量12%、平均乳化时间为(1.35±0.82)min.术后首日裸眼视力≥0.5者占95.8%,≥1.0者占39.8%.无角膜切口灼伤、切口漏液、前房异常等并发症.术后7d:A组平均手术性散光为(0.42±0.55)D,B组平均手术性散光(1.26±1.14)D,术后3个月:A组平均手术性散光为(0.35±0.25)D,B组平均手术性散光(0.87±0.62)D,两组散光变化差异均有统计学意义.结论 Bimanual微切121超声乳化白内障摘除手术具有稳定良好的临床疗效,具有切口微小等技术优势,具有很好的临床前景.
目的 對Bimanual微切口白內障摘除技術及可行性進行研究和探討,客觀評價其臨床療效.方法 對Bimanual(雙手操作)微切121超聲乳化(A組),觀察超聲能量、乳化時間和術後散光,併與常規超聲乳化手術(B組)進行比較.結果 A組超聲能量和乳化時間:覈硬度為Ⅱ級者平均應用能量3.9%、平均乳化時間為(0.56±0.40)min;Ⅲ級覈者平均應用能量8.3%、平均乳化時間為(0.65±0.58);Ⅳ級覈者平均應用能量12%、平均乳化時間為(1.35±0.82)min.術後首日裸眼視力≥0.5者佔95.8%,≥1.0者佔39.8%.無角膜切口灼傷、切口漏液、前房異常等併髮癥.術後7d:A組平均手術性散光為(0.42±0.55)D,B組平均手術性散光(1.26±1.14)D,術後3箇月:A組平均手術性散光為(0.35±0.25)D,B組平均手術性散光(0.87±0.62)D,兩組散光變化差異均有統計學意義.結論 Bimanual微切121超聲乳化白內障摘除手術具有穩定良好的臨床療效,具有切口微小等技術優勢,具有很好的臨床前景.
목적 대Bimanual미절구백내장적제기술급가행성진행연구화탐토,객관평개기림상료효.방법 대Bimanual(쌍수조작)미절121초성유화(A조),관찰초성능량、유화시간화술후산광,병여상규초성유화수술(B조)진행비교.결과 A조초성능량화유화시간:핵경도위Ⅱ급자평균응용능량3.9%、평균유화시간위(0.56±0.40)min;Ⅲ급핵자평균응용능량8.3%、평균유화시간위(0.65±0.58);Ⅳ급핵자평균응용능량12%、평균유화시간위(1.35±0.82)min.술후수일라안시력≥0.5자점95.8%,≥1.0자점39.8%.무각막절구작상、절구루액、전방이상등병발증.술후7d:A조평균수술성산광위(0.42±0.55)D,B조평균수술성산광(1.26±1.14)D,술후3개월:A조평균수술성산광위(0.35±0.25)D,B조평균수술성산광(0.87±0.62)D,량조산광변화차이균유통계학의의.결론 Bimanual미절121초성유화백내장적제수술구유은정량호적림상료효,구유절구미소등기술우세,구유흔호적림상전경.
Objective To study and explore the feasibility ofbimanual micro-incision cataract extrac-tion technology, and to evaluate it's clinical efficacy objectively. Methods Ultrasound energy, lime and emul-sified surgical astigmatism were observed in bimanual micro-incision phaeoemulsification group (A),and compared with conventional phacoemulsification group (B). Results The application of ultrasonic emulsifi-cation time and energy in group A: when nuclear hardness was degree Ⅱ, an average of 3.9 % energy was ap-plied,with an average time of the emulsion 0.56±0.40 rain; when nuclear hardness was degree Ⅲ ,an average of 8.3 % energy was applied,with an average time for the emulsification 0.65±0.58; when nuclear hardness was degree Ⅳ ,an average of 12% energy was applied,with an average time of emulsion 1.35±0.82rain. The first day postoperative uncorrected visual acuity ≥ 0.5 accounted for 95.8%,≥1.0 accounted for 39.8%. There were no corneal incision bums, incision leakage, anterior chamber abnormalities and other complications. After 7 days of operation,an average of astigmatism surgery was 0.42±0.55D in group A, 1.26±1.14 in group B,after 3 months of operation,an average of astigmatism surgery was 0.35±0.25D in group A,0.87±0.62 in group B. The changes of astigmatism in the two groups were statistically significant. Conclusion Bimanual micro-incision in phacoemulsification cataract surgery possesses good clinical efficacy, stability, and small inci-sion with technological superiority. This method has good clinical prospects.