中华核医学杂志
中華覈醫學雜誌
중화핵의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
2008年
6期
407-410
,共4页
张碧媛%傅小龙%章英剑%姚之丰%夏冰%胡伟刚%蒋国梁
張碧媛%傅小龍%章英劍%姚之豐%夏冰%鬍偉剛%蔣國樑
장벽원%부소룡%장영검%요지봉%하빙%호위강%장국량
体层摄影术,发射型计算机%体层摄影术,X线计算机%肺肿瘤%靶体积%模型,结构
體層攝影術,髮射型計算機%體層攝影術,X線計算機%肺腫瘤%靶體積%模型,結構
체층섭영술,발사형계산궤%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%폐종류%파체적%모형,결구
Tomography,emission-computed%Tomography,X-ray computed%Lung neoplasms%Target volume%Models,theoretical
目的 通过模型实验初步建立使18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET图像上显示的肿瘤体积肿瘤实际体积一致的最佳阈值条件.方法 采用美国DATA SPECTUM公司NEMA IEC-BodyPhantom setTM>体模,以不同大小的球体(体积分别为0.52,1.15,2.60,5.50,11.40,26.50 ml)模拟临床常见肺肿瘤的大小和靶/本底(T/B)比值.选择合适的窗位和窗宽,使CT图像上显示的球体体积与球体实测体积一致,并以此作为球体的实际体积,调节PET图像的阈值,使PET图像上勾画的球体轮廓与CT图像上所勾画的最接近.设绝对阈值(Ithreshold)=本底平均像素值(Iback)+相对阈值[x%Imax-back(slice)>,即每个层面的最大像素值与本底平均像素值的差值的百分比].比较应用筛选出的最佳绝对阈值与应用最广泛的靶体内最大像素值[42%Imax(total)>]为阈值勾画的球体体积大小及对实际体积覆盖率的差异.采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计学处理,行Wilcoxon法检验.结果 对体积≥5.50 ml的不同T/B比值的球体,中央1/2层面的最佳相对阈值与最大层面的最佳相对阈值相差(1.6±2.0)%,而两端1/2层面的最佳相对阈值与最大层面的最佳相对阈值相差(19.3±10.1)%,二者差异有统计学意义(Z=-7.26,P<0.01).最大层面的最佳相对阈值在20%~25%之间的改变引起勾画体积与实际体积的差异≤5%.以Ithreshold=Iback+20%Imax-back作为各层面的最佳绝对阈值,所勾画的球体体积较实际体积扩大(12.6±6.6)%,而42%Imax(total)勾画的体积较实际体积缩小(-17.2±15.2)%(Z=2.67,P<0.01),前者对实际体积的覆盖率优于后者(97.1%与79.4%,Z=-2.67,P<0.01).结论 Iback+20%Imax-back(slice)可能是不依赖于CT提供的肿瘤体积信息层面化的最佳阈值条件,其准确性优于42%Imax(total)阈值法.
目的 通過模型實驗初步建立使18F-脫氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET圖像上顯示的腫瘤體積腫瘤實際體積一緻的最佳閾值條件.方法 採用美國DATA SPECTUM公司NEMA IEC-BodyPhantom setTM>體模,以不同大小的毬體(體積分彆為0.52,1.15,2.60,5.50,11.40,26.50 ml)模擬臨床常見肺腫瘤的大小和靶/本底(T/B)比值.選擇閤適的窗位和窗寬,使CT圖像上顯示的毬體體積與毬體實測體積一緻,併以此作為毬體的實際體積,調節PET圖像的閾值,使PET圖像上勾畫的毬體輪廓與CT圖像上所勾畫的最接近.設絕對閾值(Ithreshold)=本底平均像素值(Iback)+相對閾值[x%Imax-back(slice)>,即每箇層麵的最大像素值與本底平均像素值的差值的百分比].比較應用篩選齣的最佳絕對閾值與應用最廣汎的靶體內最大像素值[42%Imax(total)>]為閾值勾畫的毬體體積大小及對實際體積覆蓋率的差異.採用SPSS 13.0軟件進行統計學處理,行Wilcoxon法檢驗.結果 對體積≥5.50 ml的不同T/B比值的毬體,中央1/2層麵的最佳相對閾值與最大層麵的最佳相對閾值相差(1.6±2.0)%,而兩耑1/2層麵的最佳相對閾值與最大層麵的最佳相對閾值相差(19.3±10.1)%,二者差異有統計學意義(Z=-7.26,P<0.01).最大層麵的最佳相對閾值在20%~25%之間的改變引起勾畫體積與實際體積的差異≤5%.以Ithreshold=Iback+20%Imax-back作為各層麵的最佳絕對閾值,所勾畫的毬體體積較實際體積擴大(12.6±6.6)%,而42%Imax(total)勾畫的體積較實際體積縮小(-17.2±15.2)%(Z=2.67,P<0.01),前者對實際體積的覆蓋率優于後者(97.1%與79.4%,Z=-2.67,P<0.01).結論 Iback+20%Imax-back(slice)可能是不依賴于CT提供的腫瘤體積信息層麵化的最佳閾值條件,其準確性優于42%Imax(total)閾值法.
목적 통과모형실험초보건립사18F-탈양포도당(FDG)PET도상상현시적종류체적종류실제체적일치적최가역치조건.방법 채용미국DATA SPECTUM공사NEMA IEC-BodyPhantom setTM>체모,이불동대소적구체(체적분별위0.52,1.15,2.60,5.50,11.40,26.50 ml)모의림상상견폐종류적대소화파/본저(T/B)비치.선택합괄적창위화창관,사CT도상상현시적구체체적여구체실측체적일치,병이차작위구체적실제체적,조절PET도상적역치,사PET도상상구화적구체륜곽여CT도상상소구화적최접근.설절대역치(Ithreshold)=본저평균상소치(Iback)+상대역치[x%Imax-back(slice)>,즉매개층면적최대상소치여본저평균상소치적차치적백분비].비교응용사선출적최가절대역치여응용최엄범적파체내최대상소치[42%Imax(total)>]위역치구화적구체체적대소급대실제체적복개솔적차이.채용SPSS 13.0연건진행통계학처리,행Wilcoxon법검험.결과 대체적≥5.50 ml적불동T/B비치적구체,중앙1/2층면적최가상대역치여최대층면적최가상대역치상차(1.6±2.0)%,이량단1/2층면적최가상대역치여최대층면적최가상대역치상차(19.3±10.1)%,이자차이유통계학의의(Z=-7.26,P<0.01).최대층면적최가상대역치재20%~25%지간적개변인기구화체적여실제체적적차이≤5%.이Ithreshold=Iback+20%Imax-back작위각층면적최가절대역치,소구화적구체체적교실제체적확대(12.6±6.6)%,이42%Imax(total)구화적체적교실제체적축소(-17.2±15.2)%(Z=2.67,P<0.01),전자대실제체적적복개솔우우후자(97.1%여79.4%,Z=-2.67,P<0.01).결론 Iback+20%Imax-back(slice)가능시불의뢰우CT제공적종류체적신식층면화적최가역치조건,기준학성우우42%Imax(total)역치법.
Objective In the literature, data regarding the optimal threshold for defining the true target volume in radiotherapy are controversial. The aim of this study was to use a phantom to evaluate an optimal threshold segmentation for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT clinical applications. Methods A NEMA IEC-Body SetTM phantom (DATA SPECTUM, USA) with spheres in various sizes (volume: 0.52, 1.15, 2.60, 5.50, 11.40 and 26.50 ml) was used to simulate lung cancer lesions of different tar-get/background (T/B) ratios. Firstly, an appropriate window in CT slice was selected and adjusted so that the sphere volumes on CT are equal to the true sphere volumes on phantoms. Secondly, the threshold of PET images was adjusted to an optimal value such that the PET volume equalizes the CT volume. An optimal threshold was thus calculated by the following formula: Ithreshold=Iback>+x% Imax-back(slice), where Ithreshold Was an absolute threshold, Iback was mean radioactivity in background, and x% Imax-back(slice) was a relative threshold. Both the size and coverage delineated at optimal threshold were compared with those generated at a fixed threshold of 42% maximum voxel radioactivity (commonly used in commercial programs). SPSS 13.0 and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis. Results For spheres > 5.50 ml with various T/B ratios,the mean deviation of optima] threshold between the middle half slices and the maximum slice was (1.6±2.0)%, whereas the corresponding value between the peripheral half slices and the maximum was (19.3±10.1)% (Z=-7.26, P <0.01). The % volume-deviation calculated with different optimal thresholds at maximum slice was ≤5% if the relative threshold varied within 20%-25%. The mean % vulume-deviation delineated by Ithreshold= Iback+20% Imax-back(slice) Was (12.6±6.6)%, while the corresponding value delinea-ted by a fixed threshold of 42% Imax(total) Was (-17.2±15.2) % (Z=-2.67, P<0.01). These results implied that Ithreshold = Iback+20% Imax-back(slice)> was superior to 42% Imax(total) in the estimation of spherical le-sion volume (97.1% vs 79.4%, Z=-2.67, P<0.01). Conclusion Iback+20% Imax-back(slice)> might be a more optimal threshold segmentation method than the conventional 42% Imax(total) parameter for more accurate target volume delineation and is independent of the target volume information provided by CT slice in ad-vance.