实用放射学杂志
實用放射學雜誌
실용방사학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL RADIOLOGY
2010年
2期
193-195
,共3页
蒋宝国%刘家铮%陈艳霞%岳玲
蔣寶國%劉傢錚%陳豔霞%嶽玲
장보국%류가쟁%진염하%악령
腹部%胃肠道穿孔%气腹%体层摄影术%X线计算机
腹部%胃腸道穿孔%氣腹%體層攝影術%X線計算機
복부%위장도천공%기복%체층섭영술%X선계산궤
abdomen%gastrointestinal perforation%pneumoperitoneum%tomography,X-ray computed
目的 评价多排螺旋CT腹部扫描时肝门周围游离气体(periportal free air PPFA)征对于鉴别上下消化道穿孔的价值.方法 回顾性分析62例经外科手术证实的消化道穿孔患者的腹部CT影像片,包括上消化道穿孔35例及下消化道穿孔27例.当肝门周围有游离气体存在时,则定义为肝门游离气体(PPFA)征阳性.观察2组中PPFA征的差别并计算PPFA在诊断上消化道穿孔时的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率.结果 上消化道穿孔的35例患者中有33例患者具有PPFA征(占94%),但下消化道穿孔的27例患者中只有10例患者存在PPFA征(占37%),两者有明显差别(P<0.05).PPFA征对于诊断上消化道穿孔的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值,阴性预测值以及准确率分别为94%(33/35),63%(17/27),77%(33/43),89%(17/19)和81%(50/62).结论 PPFA征对于鉴别上下消化道穿孔是有用的征象.
目的 評價多排螺鏇CT腹部掃描時肝門週圍遊離氣體(periportal free air PPFA)徵對于鑒彆上下消化道穿孔的價值.方法 迴顧性分析62例經外科手術證實的消化道穿孔患者的腹部CT影像片,包括上消化道穿孔35例及下消化道穿孔27例.噹肝門週圍有遊離氣體存在時,則定義為肝門遊離氣體(PPFA)徵暘性.觀察2組中PPFA徵的差彆併計算PPFA在診斷上消化道穿孔時的特異性、敏感性、暘性預測值、陰性預測值及準確率.結果 上消化道穿孔的35例患者中有33例患者具有PPFA徵(佔94%),但下消化道穿孔的27例患者中隻有10例患者存在PPFA徵(佔37%),兩者有明顯差彆(P<0.05).PPFA徵對于診斷上消化道穿孔的敏感性、特異性、暘性預測值,陰性預測值以及準確率分彆為94%(33/35),63%(17/27),77%(33/43),89%(17/19)和81%(50/62).結論 PPFA徵對于鑒彆上下消化道穿孔是有用的徵象.
목적 평개다배라선CT복부소묘시간문주위유리기체(periportal free air PPFA)정대우감별상하소화도천공적개치.방법 회고성분석62례경외과수술증실적소화도천공환자적복부CT영상편,포괄상소화도천공35례급하소화도천공27례.당간문주위유유리기체존재시,칙정의위간문유리기체(PPFA)정양성.관찰2조중PPFA정적차별병계산PPFA재진단상소화도천공시적특이성、민감성、양성예측치、음성예측치급준학솔.결과 상소화도천공적35례환자중유33례환자구유PPFA정(점94%),단하소화도천공적27례환자중지유10례환자존재PPFA정(점37%),량자유명현차별(P<0.05).PPFA정대우진단상소화도천공적민감성、특이성、양성예측치,음성예측치이급준학솔분별위94%(33/35),63%(17/27),77%(33/43),89%(17/19)화81%(50/62).결론 PPFA정대우감별상하소화도천공시유용적정상.
Objective To evaluate the value of the periportal free air(PPFA) sign at computed tomography(CT) in distinguishing between upper and lower gastrointestinal(GI) tract perforation. Methods CT images of 62 patients with surgically proven GI tract perforation were retrospectively analyzed. 62 cases included upper and lower GI tract perforation in 35 cases and 27 cases,respective-ly. When there was free air in the periportal area,it was defined as positive periportal free air(PPFA) sign. The difference of PPFA sign in upper and lower GI tract perforation, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ac-curacy of PPFA sign in diagnosing gastrointestinal perforation were analysed respectively. Results The PPFA sign was seen in 33 of 35(94%) patients with upper GI tract perforation,but only in 10 of 27 (37%) patients with lower GI tract perforation,there was sig-nificant difference between them(P<0.05). For diagnosis of super GI perforation with PPFA sign, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy were 94% (33/35), 63%(17/27), 770%(33/43), 89%(17/19) and 81% (50/ 62), respectively. Conclusion The PPFA sign is a useful finding in distinguishing between upper and lower GI tract perforation.