CAJ | 학술논문

商鞅和梭伦的上台皆因受困于“耕”和“战”。两者都重视耕战，但在制度安排上则有所不同，商鞅打破现状，重在变革；梭伦承认现实，重在继承。商鞅是通过类似于军事的手段重构了政治秩序，而梭伦则以平衡城邦内部不同阶层利益的方式缓和了公民的内部矛盾。在影响上，商鞅使得秦人因耕战而成为国家严密控制的对象，沦为国家的奴隶；梭伦则使得雅典公民成功地参予了政治，成为城邦的主人。
상앙화사륜적상태개인수곤우“경”화“전”。량자도중시경전，단재제도안배상칙유소불동，상앙타파현상，중재변혁；사륜승인현실，중재계승。상앙시통과유사우군사적수단중구료정치질서，이사륜칙이평형성방내부불동계층이익적방식완화료공민적내부모순。재영향상，상앙사득진인인경전이성위국가엄밀공제적대상，륜위국가적노대；사륜칙사득아전공민성공지삼여료정치，성위성방적주인。
Shangyang and Solon coming into power both as the ＂ cultivation＂ and ＂war＂. They pay attention to cultivation and war, but different in the design of system. Shangyang breaks the present situation, while Solon mainly acknowledges it. We hold that their basic differences in that the former reconstraction the system by military means while the latter alleviates the contradiction by balanced the benefits of the different social classes. Shangyang make the man of the Qinguo into the slaves of the country, while the people of Athens success in participating in the politics and turn into the master of the country under the reform of Solon.