中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2010年
3期
246-247
,共2页
张维成%麦伟%廖兴华%黄晓魏%方文焕%李智
張維成%麥偉%廖興華%黃曉魏%方文煥%李智
장유성%맥위%료흥화%황효위%방문환%리지
颈椎病%椎间盘%关节成形术%置换%融合
頸椎病%椎間盤%關節成形術%置換%融閤
경추병%추간반%관절성형술%치환%융합
Cervical spondylosis%Intervertebral disc%Arthroplasty%Replacement%Fusion
目的 对照人工椎间盘置换术与脊柱融合术治疗颈椎病的临床效果.方法 对2007年1月至2008年12月共20例颈椎病患者施行人工椎间盘置换术(人工椎间盘置换组),对24例颈椎病患者实施脊柱融合术(脊椎融合组).手术前和术后3个月对2种手术方式疗效进行日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,并分别摄颈椎动力位X线片,观察颈椎的稳定性及活动度,比较2种手术效果.结果 2种手术方法术后临床症状缓解,脊髓功能改善,均无并发症.术后3个月,所有患者JOA评分均较术前明显提高(13.3±1.9 vs 9.2±2.2;12.5±2.1 vs 8.8±2.3,P<0.01),2种手术方法间比较,JOA评分无统计学意义(13.3±1.9 VS 12.5±2.1,P>0.05).结论 人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的临床效果与脊柱融合术相同,但人工椎间盘置换术具有脊柱稳定性良好,运动功能无明显丢失,手术及临近节段的活动范围接近正常人群等优点,因此有利于预防脊柱邻近节段继发性退变.
目的 對照人工椎間盤置換術與脊柱融閤術治療頸椎病的臨床效果.方法 對2007年1月至2008年12月共20例頸椎病患者施行人工椎間盤置換術(人工椎間盤置換組),對24例頸椎病患者實施脊柱融閤術(脊椎融閤組).手術前和術後3箇月對2種手術方式療效進行日本骨科協會(JOA)評分,併分彆攝頸椎動力位X線片,觀察頸椎的穩定性及活動度,比較2種手術效果.結果 2種手術方法術後臨床癥狀緩解,脊髓功能改善,均無併髮癥.術後3箇月,所有患者JOA評分均較術前明顯提高(13.3±1.9 vs 9.2±2.2;12.5±2.1 vs 8.8±2.3,P<0.01),2種手術方法間比較,JOA評分無統計學意義(13.3±1.9 VS 12.5±2.1,P>0.05).結論 人工椎間盤置換術治療頸椎病的臨床效果與脊柱融閤術相同,但人工椎間盤置換術具有脊柱穩定性良好,運動功能無明顯丟失,手術及臨近節段的活動範圍接近正常人群等優點,因此有利于預防脊柱鄰近節段繼髮性退變.
목적 대조인공추간반치환술여척주융합술치료경추병적림상효과.방법 대2007년1월지2008년12월공20례경추병환자시행인공추간반치환술(인공추간반치환조),대24례경추병환자실시척주융합술(척추융합조).수술전화술후3개월대2충수술방식료효진행일본골과협회(JOA)평분,병분별섭경추동력위X선편,관찰경추적은정성급활동도,비교2충수술효과.결과 2충수술방법술후림상증상완해,척수공능개선,균무병발증.술후3개월,소유환자JOA평분균교술전명현제고(13.3±1.9 vs 9.2±2.2;12.5±2.1 vs 8.8±2.3,P<0.01),2충수술방법간비교,JOA평분무통계학의의(13.3±1.9 VS 12.5±2.1,P>0.05).결론 인공추간반치환술치료경추병적림상효과여척주융합술상동,단인공추간반치환술구유척주은정성량호,운동공능무명현주실,수술급림근절단적활동범위접근정상인군등우점,인차유리우예방척주린근절단계발성퇴변.
Objectives To compare the curative effects of artificial disc replacement and spinal fusion in treating cervical spondylosis. Methods A total of 20 patients with cervical spondylosis received artificial disc re-placement and 24 cases were treated with spinal fusion. Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA) 17 score scale was used for the neurological assessment and dynamical X-rays examination was done preoperatively and 3 month postop-eratively. The stability and the movement range of the cervical vertebrae were observed. Results All patients in two groups had improvement of clinical symptom and spinal cord function. There was no complication. Three months later, JOA score increased obviously in all cases(P <0.01) and there was no statistical significance between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Artificial disc replacement and the spinal fusion show the same clinical results in treating cervical spondylosis, but the artificial disc replacement has advantages like good spinal stability, no loss of motor function, motion range of close to normal population and helps prevent adjacent degeneration.