中国胸心血管外科临床杂志
中國胸心血管外科臨床雜誌
중국흉심혈관외과림상잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
2001年
2期
95-97
,共3页
张平%肖锡俊%殷得福%庄翔%罗朝志%陈永祥%黄旭中%田子朴
張平%肖錫俊%慇得福%莊翔%囉朝誌%陳永祥%黃旭中%田子樸
장평%초석준%은득복%장상%라조지%진영상%황욱중%전자박
抑肽酶%心瓣膜置换术%促炎症细胞因子
抑肽酶%心瓣膜置換術%促炎癥細胞因子
억태매%심판막치환술%촉염증세포인자
目的了解抑肽酶对心瓣膜置换术患者围术期全身炎症应答的影响。方法将接受心瓣膜置换术的16例患者随机分为:对照组(n=8),不用抑肽酶;治疗组(n=8),于预冲液中加入抑肽酶300万单位,分别于术前、停机、停机后1小时和术后1天抽取外周血2ml,收集血清用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)双抗夹心法检测白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和白细胞介素-8(IL-8)。结果体外循环术后患者血清IL-6和IL-8水平升高(P<0.05);术后1天仍高于术前;停机后1小时治疗组IL-6水平和停机时IL-8水平低于对照组,但差别均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论尽管抑肽酶有抗炎症效应,但仅预冲液中加入抑肽酶300万单位无法有效抑制心瓣膜置换术患者围术期促炎性细胞因子IL-6和IL-8的释放。
目的瞭解抑肽酶對心瓣膜置換術患者圍術期全身炎癥應答的影響。方法將接受心瓣膜置換術的16例患者隨機分為:對照組(n=8),不用抑肽酶;治療組(n=8),于預遲液中加入抑肽酶300萬單位,分彆于術前、停機、停機後1小時和術後1天抽取外週血2ml,收集血清用酶聯免疫吸附測定(ELISA)雙抗夾心法檢測白細胞介素-6(IL-6)和白細胞介素-8(IL-8)。結果體外循環術後患者血清IL-6和IL-8水平升高(P<0.05);術後1天仍高于術前;停機後1小時治療組IL-6水平和停機時IL-8水平低于對照組,但差彆均無顯著性意義(P>0.05)。結論儘管抑肽酶有抗炎癥效應,但僅預遲液中加入抑肽酶300萬單位無法有效抑製心瓣膜置換術患者圍術期促炎性細胞因子IL-6和IL-8的釋放。
목적료해억태매대심판막치환술환자위술기전신염증응답적영향。방법장접수심판막치환술적16례환자수궤분위:대조조(n=8),불용억태매;치료조(n=8),우예충액중가입억태매300만단위,분별우술전、정궤、정궤후1소시화술후1천추취외주혈2ml,수집혈청용매련면역흡부측정(ELISA)쌍항협심법검측백세포개소-6(IL-6)화백세포개소-8(IL-8)。결과체외순배술후환자혈청IL-6화IL-8수평승고(P<0.05);술후1천잉고우술전;정궤후1소시치료조IL-6수평화정궤시IL-8수평저우대조조,단차별균무현저성의의(P>0.05)。결론진관억태매유항염증효응,단부예충액중가입억태매300만단위무법유효억제심판막치환술환자위술기촉염성세포인자IL-6화IL-8적석방。
Objective To explore the effect of Aprotintin on whole-body inflammatory response in the patients with cardiac valve replacement during perioperative period. Methods Sixteen patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement were randomized to control group (n=8) which received an equivalent volume prime without aprotinin and the aprotinin therapy group (n=8) which received 3×106 IU of aprotinin added to the priming solution of the extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Serum samples were collected before the operation, at the end of ECC, 1 h after the end of ECC and 1 d after the operation respectively. interleukin-6(IL-6) and interleukin-8(IL-8) were assayed by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent techniques. Results After ECC the levels of IL-6 and IL-8 increased significantly in both groups (P<0.05). The levels of 1d after the operation were still higher than that before the operation in both groups, but there were no statistic significance (P>0.05). At 1h after the end of ECC, the level of IL-6 in aprotinin group was lower than that of control group (P>0.05). At the end of ECC, the level of IL-8 in aprotinin group was lower than that of control group (P>0.05)。 Conclusion Although aprotinin has antiinflammatory activity, but pump prime adding aprotinin 3×106 IU only may fail to attenuate proinflammatory cytokine release (IL-6,IL-8) effectively in patients with cardiac valve replacement during perioperative period.