温州医学院学报
溫州醫學院學報
온주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF WENZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2001年
2期
93-95
,共3页
洪建军%高伟阳%廖孔荣%厉智%李志杰%陈星隆
洪建軍%高偉暘%廖孔榮%厲智%李誌傑%陳星隆
홍건군%고위양%료공영%려지%리지걸%진성륭
软组织损伤%修复%亚急诊
軟組織損傷%脩複%亞急診
연조직손상%수복%아급진
目的:探讨亚急诊修复四肢软组织缺损的可行性。方法:本院于1990~1999年共收住403例四肢软组织缺损病人,运用带蒂皮瓣、游离皮瓣及植皮方法在不同时期进行修复,其中急诊手术124例,亚急诊(急诊清创后1~5天)手术163例,晚期(5天以后)手术116例。同时对三组病例术后感染率、皮瓣坏死率及功能恢复情况进行统计研究。结果: 亚急诊手术感染率为3.7%,急诊手术感染率为3.2%,晚期手术感染率为3.4%;吻合血管的游离皮瓣移植病例,亚急诊手术坏死率为4.8%,急诊手术坏死率为8.3%,晚期手术坏死率为7. 4%。三组病例术后感染率、游离皮瓣移植术后坏死率差异无显著性(P >0.05)。114例单纯手背皮肤缺损行皮瓣修复术后手指活动功能比较结果显示,亚急诊手术优良率为87.2%,急诊手术优良率为90.5%,晚期手术优良率为64.0%。亚急诊与急诊病例术后功能优良率差异无显著性(P>0.05),而与晚期病例差异有显著性( P<0.05),前者优于后者。结论: 亚急诊期为急诊清创后1~5天较妥,此时修复四肢软组织缺损能兼顾急诊和晚期手术的利弊,临床实施安全可靠。
目的:探討亞急診脩複四肢軟組織缺損的可行性。方法:本院于1990~1999年共收住403例四肢軟組織缺損病人,運用帶蒂皮瓣、遊離皮瓣及植皮方法在不同時期進行脩複,其中急診手術124例,亞急診(急診清創後1~5天)手術163例,晚期(5天以後)手術116例。同時對三組病例術後感染率、皮瓣壞死率及功能恢複情況進行統計研究。結果: 亞急診手術感染率為3.7%,急診手術感染率為3.2%,晚期手術感染率為3.4%;吻閤血管的遊離皮瓣移植病例,亞急診手術壞死率為4.8%,急診手術壞死率為8.3%,晚期手術壞死率為7. 4%。三組病例術後感染率、遊離皮瓣移植術後壞死率差異無顯著性(P >0.05)。114例單純手揹皮膚缺損行皮瓣脩複術後手指活動功能比較結果顯示,亞急診手術優良率為87.2%,急診手術優良率為90.5%,晚期手術優良率為64.0%。亞急診與急診病例術後功能優良率差異無顯著性(P>0.05),而與晚期病例差異有顯著性( P<0.05),前者優于後者。結論: 亞急診期為急診清創後1~5天較妥,此時脩複四肢軟組織缺損能兼顧急診和晚期手術的利弊,臨床實施安全可靠。
목적:탐토아급진수복사지연조직결손적가행성。방법:본원우1990~1999년공수주403례사지연조직결손병인,운용대체피판、유리피판급식피방법재불동시기진행수복,기중급진수술124례,아급진(급진청창후1~5천)수술163례,만기(5천이후)수술116례。동시대삼조병례술후감염솔、피판배사솔급공능회복정황진행통계연구。결과: 아급진수술감염솔위3.7%,급진수술감염솔위3.2%,만기수술감염솔위3.4%;문합혈관적유리피판이식병례,아급진수술배사솔위4.8%,급진수술배사솔위8.3%,만기수술배사솔위7. 4%。삼조병례술후감염솔、유리피판이식술후배사솔차이무현저성(P >0.05)。114례단순수배피부결손행피판수복술후수지활동공능비교결과현시,아급진수술우량솔위87.2%,급진수술우량솔위90.5%,만기수술우량솔위64.0%。아급진여급진병례술후공능우량솔차이무현저성(P>0.05),이여만기병례차이유현저성( P<0.05),전자우우후자。결론: 아급진기위급진청창후1~5천교타,차시수복사지연조직결손능겸고급진화만기수술적리폐,림상실시안전가고。
Objective:To explore the possiblity of sub-emergent repair of the soft tissue defects. Methods:From 1990 to 1999, 403 cases with the soft tissu e defects in the four limbs were repaired by the pedicled flaps, free flaps, and full-thickness or split-thickness grafting. 124 of them were repaired emergently, 163 of them were repaired subemergently, 11 6 of them were repaired in late-stage. A retrospective analysis has been made. Results:The necroses rate, infection rate of subemergent repair did not show difference from the other groups(P >0.05). Their function was better than that in the later period repai red cases(P<0.05). Conclusion:Subemergent repair gives enough consideration to t he advantages of emergent repair and the disavantages of late-stage r epair. It is safety in clinical application.