国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2010年
13期
1571-1573
,共3页
苏久龙%潘翠环%叶正茂%沈怡%万新炉
囌久龍%潘翠環%葉正茂%瀋怡%萬新爐
소구룡%반취배%협정무%침이%만신로
神经松动术%脑卒中%偏瘫%上肢功能
神經鬆動術%腦卒中%偏癱%上肢功能
신경송동술%뇌졸중%편탄%상지공능
Neural mobilization%Stroke%Hemiplegia%Upper limb function
目的 研究神经松动术对脑卒中患者早期上肢功能康复的效果.方法 43例脑卒中偏瘫患者,年龄45~76岁,随机分为研究组22例和对照组21例,两组均采用常规康复治疗,研究组同时运用神经松动术进行治疗.治疗前、治疗后3周分别采用上肢Fugl-Meyer量表(FMA)、简易上肢功能检查(STEF)评价患者的上肢运动功能.结果 研究组、对照组治疗3周后上肢FMA评分分别为(52.41±2.27)分、(39.48±4.42)分;STEF评分分别为(59.41±3.02)分、(47.73±2.62)分,比较差异有显著性(P<0.05),研究组患者治疗后效果较治疗前有显著提高(P<0.01).结论神经松动术结合康复治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者早期上肢功能恢复有较好的治疗效果.
目的 研究神經鬆動術對腦卒中患者早期上肢功能康複的效果.方法 43例腦卒中偏癱患者,年齡45~76歲,隨機分為研究組22例和對照組21例,兩組均採用常規康複治療,研究組同時運用神經鬆動術進行治療.治療前、治療後3週分彆採用上肢Fugl-Meyer量錶(FMA)、簡易上肢功能檢查(STEF)評價患者的上肢運動功能.結果 研究組、對照組治療3週後上肢FMA評分分彆為(52.41±2.27)分、(39.48±4.42)分;STEF評分分彆為(59.41±3.02)分、(47.73±2.62)分,比較差異有顯著性(P<0.05),研究組患者治療後效果較治療前有顯著提高(P<0.01).結論神經鬆動術結閤康複治療對腦卒中偏癱患者早期上肢功能恢複有較好的治療效果.
목적 연구신경송동술대뇌졸중환자조기상지공능강복적효과.방법 43례뇌졸중편탄환자,년령45~76세,수궤분위연구조22례화대조조21례,량조균채용상규강복치료,연구조동시운용신경송동술진행치료.치료전、치료후3주분별채용상지Fugl-Meyer량표(FMA)、간역상지공능검사(STEF)평개환자적상지운동공능.결과 연구조、대조조치료3주후상지FMA평분분별위(52.41±2.27)분、(39.48±4.42)분;STEF평분분별위(59.41±3.02)분、(47.73±2.62)분,비교차이유현저성(P<0.05),연구조환자치료후효과교치료전유현저제고(P<0.01).결론신경송동술결합강복치료대뇌졸중편탄환자조기상지공능회복유교호적치료효과.
Objective To explore the efficacy of neural mobilization on the early recovery of upper limb function in stroke patients. Methods 43 stroke patients with hemiplegia, aged 45-76 (mean 63. 40 ±7.52), were randomly assigned to receive conventional rehabilitation treatment plus neural mobilization (22 patients, study group), or conventional rehabilitation treatment alone (21 patients, control group). Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA) and simple upper limb function test (STEF) were used to evaluate the motor function of the upper limbs before treatment and 3 weeks after treatment. Results There were no signifi cant differences in the scores for FMA and STEF between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05); however, the scores for both assessments differed 3 weeks after treatment (P<0.05), but the efficacy of combination therapy was better than that of conventional treatment alone (P<0.05). Conclusions Neural mobilization combined with rehabilitation therapy has a better efficacy in the early recovery of the upper limb function in stroke patients with hemiplegia.