中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2012年
26期
26-29
,共4页
杨博宇%马一功%朱银乐%马峥%王洪根
楊博宇%馬一功%硃銀樂%馬崢%王洪根
양박우%마일공%주은악%마쟁%왕홍근
膝关节%透明质酸%糖皮质激素类%骨关节炎
膝關節%透明質痠%糖皮質激素類%骨關節炎
슬관절%투명질산%당피질격소류%골관절염
Knee joint%Hyaluronic acid%Glucocorticoids%Osteoarthritis
目的 比较玻璃酸钠与玻璃酸钠联合曲安奈德膝关节腔内注射治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(0A)的疗效.方法 选取2010年3月至2011年3月接受膝关节腔内注射治疗的82例膝关节OA患者,以掷硬币法随机分为两组:单纯接受玻璃酸钠腔内注射42例(玻璃酸钠组),玻璃酸钠联合曲安奈德腔内注射40例(联合组).两组均每周注射1次,共5次.疗效评价包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量值以及安全性评估.结果 联合组在注射后1周上下楼梯时VAS测量值为(22.6±6.1)mm,较玻璃酸钠组的(63.9±5.8) mm显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).联合组和玻璃酸钠组在疗程结束后3个月和6个月上下楼梯时VAS测量值比较差异无统计学意义[(42.2±6.6) mm比(41.1±5.3) mm,(48.5±5.5)mm比(49.3±6.2) mm](P> 0.05).两组治疗后膝关节功能皆优于治疗前,不良反应少见且轻微.结论 玻璃酸钠与玻璃酸钠联合曲安奈德腔内注射都可以作为治疗膝关节OA的安全、有效的方法.玻璃酸钠联合应用曲安奈德可以提高治疗初期的疗效.
目的 比較玻璃痠鈉與玻璃痠鈉聯閤麯安奈德膝關節腔內註射治療膝關節骨性關節炎(0A)的療效.方法 選取2010年3月至2011年3月接受膝關節腔內註射治療的82例膝關節OA患者,以擲硬幣法隨機分為兩組:單純接受玻璃痠鈉腔內註射42例(玻璃痠鈉組),玻璃痠鈉聯閤麯安奈德腔內註射40例(聯閤組).兩組均每週註射1次,共5次.療效評價包括疼痛視覺模擬量錶(VAS)測量值以及安全性評估.結果 聯閤組在註射後1週上下樓梯時VAS測量值為(22.6±6.1)mm,較玻璃痠鈉組的(63.9±5.8) mm顯著降低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).聯閤組和玻璃痠鈉組在療程結束後3箇月和6箇月上下樓梯時VAS測量值比較差異無統計學意義[(42.2±6.6) mm比(41.1±5.3) mm,(48.5±5.5)mm比(49.3±6.2) mm](P> 0.05).兩組治療後膝關節功能皆優于治療前,不良反應少見且輕微.結論 玻璃痠鈉與玻璃痠鈉聯閤麯安奈德腔內註射都可以作為治療膝關節OA的安全、有效的方法.玻璃痠鈉聯閤應用麯安奈德可以提高治療初期的療效.
목적 비교파리산납여파리산납연합곡안내덕슬관절강내주사치료슬관절골성관절염(0A)적료효.방법 선취2010년3월지2011년3월접수슬관절강내주사치료적82례슬관절OA환자,이척경폐법수궤분위량조:단순접수파리산납강내주사42례(파리산납조),파리산납연합곡안내덕강내주사40례(연합조).량조균매주주사1차,공5차.료효평개포괄동통시각모의량표(VAS)측량치이급안전성평고.결과 연합조재주사후1주상하루제시VAS측량치위(22.6±6.1)mm,교파리산납조적(63.9±5.8) mm현저강저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).연합조화파리산납조재료정결속후3개월화6개월상하루제시VAS측량치비교차이무통계학의의[(42.2±6.6) mm비(41.1±5.3) mm,(48.5±5.5)mm비(49.3±6.2) mm](P> 0.05).량조치료후슬관절공능개우우치료전,불량반응소견차경미.결론 파리산납여파리산납연합곡안내덕강내주사도가이작위치료슬관절OA적안전、유효적방법.파리산납연합응용곡안내덕가이제고치료초기적료효.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of intraarticular injection with sodium hyaluronate (SH) and SH combined with triamcinolone acetonide for osteoarthritis (OA) of knee joint.Methods Eighty-two patients with OA of knee joint were divided into two groups by toss a coin from March 2010 to March 2011.Forty-two patients simplely accepted SH injection (SH group),40 patients accepted SH combined with triamcinolone acetonide (combination group).Intraarticular injection was taken once a week,a total of 5 times.Efficacy measurements included visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and safety.Results After treatment for 1 week,the measured value of VAS for up and down stairs in combination group was significantly lower than that in SH group [ (22.6 ± 6.1 ) mm vs.(63.9 ± 5.8 ) mm] (P < 0.05 ).After treatment for 3,6 months,the measured value of VAS for up and down stairs in two groups had no significant difference [ (42.2 ± 6.6) mm vs.(41.1 ± 5.3) mm,(48.5 ± 5.5) mm vs.(49.3 ± 6.2) mm] (P > 0.05).Function of the knee joint after treatment was better than before treatment in two groups.Adverse effects were minimal. Conclusions Intraarticular injection of SH and SH combined with triamcinolone acetonide OA of knee joint is a safe and effective method.SH combined with triamcinolone acetonide can improve the efficacy in early period.