颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期与非急性期手术184例分析
로내동맥류파렬급성기여비급성기수술184례분석
Early and non- early surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis of 184 cases
  • 万方数据
    中华急诊医学杂志 중화급진의학잡지
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
    2010年 8期 858-861 ,共4页

    吴群%吴盛%凌晨晗%张建民%陈高%祝向东%傅伟明%胡华%张宏%沈宏%赵学群

    오군%오성%릉신함%장건민%진고%축향동%부위명%호화%장굉%침굉%조학군

    颅内动脉瘤%动脉瘤破裂%蛛网膜下腔出血%急性期手术%非急性期手术%再出血%脑梗塞%脑积水%预后 顱內動脈瘤%動脈瘤破裂%蛛網膜下腔齣血%急性期手術%非急性期手術%再齣血%腦梗塞%腦積水%預後
    로내동맥류%동맥류파렬%주망막하강출혈%급성기수술%비급성기수술%재출혈%뇌경새%뇌적수%예후
    Intracranial aneurysms%Ruptured intracranial aneurysms%Subarachnoid hemorrhage%Early surgery%Non-early surgery%Rebleeding%Cerebral infarction%Hydrocephalus%Prognosis
    目的 比较颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期和非急性期手术治疗的优缺点.方法 对2008年12月至2009年9月浙江大学医学院附属第二医院184例颅内动脉瘤破裂的数据进行回顾性分析.将动脉瘤破裂后3 d内行手术治疗的患者归入急性期手术组(102例),将破裂后大于3 d再行手术治疗的患者归入非急性期手术组(82例).组间比较采用成组设计的t检验;率比较采用x2检验.研究两者之间在术前再出血率,术中完全夹闭率,术后脑梗死、脑积水发生率等方面的差异.在6～12个月的随访中,通过格拉斯哥预后评分(glasgow outcome scale,GOS)计分,分析两组患者手术预后的差异.结果 急性期组术前再出血2例,非急性期组再出血7例;术前再出血率差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).急性期组完全夹闭率91.2%(93/102),非急性期组完全夹闭率80.5%(66/82),差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).急性期手术组患者术后脑梗死发生率10.8%(11/102),术后脑积水发生率6.86%(7/102).非急性期组术后脑梗死发生率4.88%(4/82),术后脑积水发生率3.66%(3/82).两组之间差异无统计学意义.术后随访中,将患者根据GOS评分分为死亡(1分),致残(2～3分),良好(4～5分).非急性期组7例死亡,11例致残,55例恢复良好;急性期组8例死亡,16例致残,73例恢复良好,急性期组良好率较高,但两组间差异无统计学意义.结论 ①急性期手术可以明显减少术前再次出血,从而减低因术前出血引起的死亡致残风险.②急性期手术术中可以通过腰大池置管引流等方法降低颅内压,明显提高完全夹闭率,促进患者的康复.
    목적 비교로내동맥류파렬급성기화비급성기수술치료적우결점.방법 대2008년12월지2009년9월절강대학의학원부속제이의원184례로내동맥류파렬적수거진행회고성분석.장동맥류파렬후3 d내행수술치료적환자귀입급성기수술조(102례),장파렬후대우3 d재행수술치료적환자귀입비급성기수술조(82례).조간비교채용성조설계적t검험;솔비교채용x2검험.연구량자지간재술전재출혈솔,술중완전협폐솔,술후뇌경사、뇌적수발생솔등방면적차이.재6～12개월적수방중,통과격랍사가예후평분(glasgow outcome scale,GOS)계분,분석량조환자수술예후적차이.결과 급성기조술전재출혈2례,비급성기조재출혈7례;술전재출혈솔차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05).급성기조완전협폐솔91.2%(93/102),비급성기조완전협폐솔80.5%(66/82),차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05).급성기수술조환자술후뇌경사발생솔10.8%(11/102),술후뇌적수발생솔6.86%(7/102).비급성기조술후뇌경사발생솔4.88%(4/82),술후뇌적수발생솔3.66%(3/82).량조지간차이무통계학의의.술후수방중,장환자근거GOS평분분위사망(1분),치잔(2～3분),량호(4～5분).비급성기조7례사망,11례치잔,55례회복량호;급성기조8례사망,16례치잔,73례회복량호,급성기조량호솔교고,단량조간차이무통계학의의.결론 ①급성기수술가이명현감소술전재차출혈,종이감저인술전출혈인기적사망치잔풍험.②급성기수술술중가이통과요대지치관인류등방법강저로내압,명현제고완전협폐솔,촉진환자적강복.
    Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between emergency and non-emergency operation for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Method A retrospective analysis of 184 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, admitted from Dec 2008 to Sep 2009, was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of operation to be done earlier. The patients were divided into 2groups according to the time of surgery. In the early operation group ( n = 102), the patients were operated on within 3 days of rupture of aneurysms, and in the delayed operation group ( n = 82), the patients were operated on after 3 days. The comparison in the rate of rebleeding before surgery, rate of complete occlusion of the ruptured aneurysm and rate of major complications such as cerebral infarction and hydrocephalus between two groups was made. The Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) scores of these patients were also evaluated by 6- 12 months follow-up after operation. Results Preoperative re-bleeding happened in 2 patients of the early operation group and in 7 patients of the delayed operation group. The rates were significantly different ( P ＜ 0.05). The complete occlusion rate in the early operation group was 91.2 % ( 93/102 ), while was 80.5 % ( 66/82 ) in the delayed operation group (P＜0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in post-operative cerebral infarction rate, post-operative hydrocephalus rate or GOS scores on follow-up between two groups. Conchusions Early operation can significantly reduce the re-bleeding before surgery, reducing the risk of death and disability. In early operation, the continuous lumbar drainage by cannulation and other methods can be used to reduce intracranial pressure, significantly increasing the rate of complete occlusion, and promoting rehabilitation.
    원문보기 원문다운로드 사이트로이동
저자의 최근 논문