中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)
中華腔鏡泌尿外科雜誌(電子版)
중화강경비뇨외과잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2012年
2期
3-6
,共4页
温星桥%黄文涛%朱宝益%李师耿%司徒杰%胡成%王喻%高新
溫星橋%黃文濤%硃寶益%李師耿%司徒傑%鬍成%王喻%高新
온성교%황문도%주보익%리사경%사도걸%호성%왕유%고신
单孔腹腔镜%输尿管切开取石术%输尿管结石
單孔腹腔鏡%輸尿管切開取石術%輸尿管結石
단공복강경%수뇨관절개취석술%수뇨관결석
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery%Ureterolithotomy%Ureteral calculi
目的 探讨经腹膜后途径,行单孔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的可行性及疗效.方法 2010年6月至2011年2月,收治8例单侧输尿管上段结石患者,采用自制多通道套管,经腹膜后途经,行单孔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术.以同一术者完成的15例传统腹腔镜经腹膜后输尿管切开取石术作为对照组.对比两组的手术时间、出血量、手术并发症、平均住院时间、术后镇痛药应用时间及腹膜后引流管停留时间等指标.结果 所有单孔腹腔镜手术均获成功、无1例转为传统腹腔镜或开放术式.结石平均长径18 mm,平均手术时间131±16min,失血量30±5 ml,1例术后出现尿漏、于术后第3天停止;无其他手术并发症.两组手术时间、出血量、腹膜后引流管停留时间等无明显差异.单孔腹腔镜组在平均住院时间、术后镇痛药应用天数及美容效果等方面优于传统腹腔镜组.两组患者均获得治愈.结论 单孔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术是可行、有效的,适用于治疗部份体积较大的输尿管结石病例,其远期效果有待增加病例数进一步评估.
目的 探討經腹膜後途徑,行單孔腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術的可行性及療效.方法 2010年6月至2011年2月,收治8例單側輸尿管上段結石患者,採用自製多通道套管,經腹膜後途經,行單孔腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術.以同一術者完成的15例傳統腹腔鏡經腹膜後輸尿管切開取石術作為對照組.對比兩組的手術時間、齣血量、手術併髮癥、平均住院時間、術後鎮痛藥應用時間及腹膜後引流管停留時間等指標.結果 所有單孔腹腔鏡手術均穫成功、無1例轉為傳統腹腔鏡或開放術式.結石平均長徑18 mm,平均手術時間131±16min,失血量30±5 ml,1例術後齣現尿漏、于術後第3天停止;無其他手術併髮癥.兩組手術時間、齣血量、腹膜後引流管停留時間等無明顯差異.單孔腹腔鏡組在平均住院時間、術後鎮痛藥應用天數及美容效果等方麵優于傳統腹腔鏡組.兩組患者均穫得治愈.結論 單孔腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術是可行、有效的,適用于治療部份體積較大的輸尿管結石病例,其遠期效果有待增加病例數進一步評估.
목적 탐토경복막후도경,행단공복강경수뇨관절개취석술적가행성급료효.방법 2010년6월지2011년2월,수치8례단측수뇨관상단결석환자,채용자제다통도투관,경복막후도경,행단공복강경수뇨관절개취석술.이동일술자완성적15례전통복강경경복막후수뇨관절개취석술작위대조조.대비량조적수술시간、출혈량、수술병발증、평균주원시간、술후진통약응용시간급복막후인류관정류시간등지표.결과 소유단공복강경수술균획성공、무1례전위전통복강경혹개방술식.결석평균장경18 mm,평균수술시간131±16min,실혈량30±5 ml,1례술후출현뇨루、우술후제3천정지;무기타수술병발증.량조수술시간、출혈량、복막후인류관정류시간등무명현차이.단공복강경조재평균주원시간、술후진통약응용천수급미용효과등방면우우전통복강경조.량조환자균획득치유.결론 단공복강경수뇨관절개취석술시가행、유효적,괄용우치료부빈체적교대적수뇨관결석병례,기원기효과유대증가병례수진일보평고.
Objective To evalutate the feasibility and effect of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ureterolithotomy.Methods From June 2010 to April 2011,a total of eight patients with upper ureteral calculi underwent LESS ureterolithotomy by using a home-made single port device.Fifteen patients who underwent traditional retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy by the same surgeon were selected for comparison.The operative time,blood loss,operative complication,post-operative hospital stay,post-operative pain and placement time of retroperitoneal drainage tube were compared.Results All LESS ureterolithotomy procedures were completed successfully.No cases were converted to traditional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery.The average longitudinal diameter of the calculous was 18 mm,the mean operative time was 131±16 min,mean estimated blood loss was 30±5 ml.One case had urine leakage in the first three days after the operation.No other operative complications happened.The operative time,blood loss,complications and placement time of retroperitoneal drainage tube were similar between the two groups.However,the average hospital stay,days of pain-killer applied,and the cosmetic result of the LESS group were better than that in the traditional laparoscopic group.All patients in both groups were cured with a mean follow-up time of seven months.Conclusions Laparoendoscopic single-site laparoendoscopic surgery for ureterolithotomy is feasible and effective,it may be applied in bigger ureteral calculi in selective patients.Further studies were needed to evaluate its long-term effects.