中华核医学杂志
中華覈醫學雜誌
중화핵의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
2011年
3期
145-150
,共6页
李洪生%吴湖炳%王全师%王巧愚%李葆元
李洪生%吳湖炳%王全師%王巧愚%李葆元
리홍생%오호병%왕전사%왕교우%리보원
淋巴瘤,大B细胞,弥漫型%药物疗法%体层摄影术,发射型计算机%体层摄影术,X线计算机%脱氧葡萄糖
淋巴瘤,大B細胞,瀰漫型%藥物療法%體層攝影術,髮射型計算機%體層攝影術,X線計算機%脫氧葡萄糖
림파류,대B세포,미만형%약물요법%체층섭영술,발사형계산궤%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%탈양포도당
Lymphoma,large B-cell,diffuse%Drug therapy%Tomography,emission-computed%Tomography,X-ray computed%Deoxyglucose
目的 探讨18F-FDG PET/CT评价弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者化疗中期治疗反应的价值.方法 DLBCL初诊患者53例,采用环磷酰胺+阿霉素+长春新碱+泼尼松(CHOP)或利妥苷单克隆抗体+环磷酰胺+阿霉素+长春新碱+泼尼松(R-CHOP)方案化疗,分别于化疗前和化疗中期(4个疗程后)进行18F-FDG PET/CT显像.根据肿瘤对化疗的反应将病例分为完全反应组、部分反应组和无反应组,比较3组患者的完全缓解率.用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计学分析,完全缓解率的比较用χ2检验.结果 完全反应组、部分反应组和无反应组的临床完全缓解率分别为88.5%(23/26)、73.3%(11/15)和8.3%(1/12),3组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=23.548,P=0.000).完全反应组、部分反应组的完全缓解率高于无反应组(χ2=22.656,P=0.000和χ2=11.407,P=0.001).结论 DLBCL患者化疗中期18F-FDG PET/CT显像有助于预测其化疗疗效.
目的 探討18F-FDG PET/CT評價瀰漫性大B細胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者化療中期治療反應的價值.方法 DLBCL初診患者53例,採用環燐酰胺+阿黴素+長春新堿+潑尼鬆(CHOP)或利妥苷單剋隆抗體+環燐酰胺+阿黴素+長春新堿+潑尼鬆(R-CHOP)方案化療,分彆于化療前和化療中期(4箇療程後)進行18F-FDG PET/CT顯像.根據腫瘤對化療的反應將病例分為完全反應組、部分反應組和無反應組,比較3組患者的完全緩解率.用SPSS 13.0軟件進行統計學分析,完全緩解率的比較用χ2檢驗.結果 完全反應組、部分反應組和無反應組的臨床完全緩解率分彆為88.5%(23/26)、73.3%(11/15)和8.3%(1/12),3組間差異有統計學意義(χ2=23.548,P=0.000).完全反應組、部分反應組的完全緩解率高于無反應組(χ2=22.656,P=0.000和χ2=11.407,P=0.001).結論 DLBCL患者化療中期18F-FDG PET/CT顯像有助于預測其化療療效.
목적 탐토18F-FDG PET/CT평개미만성대B세포림파류(DLBCL)환자화료중기치료반응적개치.방법 DLBCL초진환자53례,채용배린선알+아매소+장춘신감+발니송(CHOP)혹리타감단극륭항체+배린선알+아매소+장춘신감+발니송(R-CHOP)방안화료,분별우화료전화화료중기(4개료정후)진행18F-FDG PET/CT현상.근거종류대화료적반응장병례분위완전반응조、부분반응조화무반응조,비교3조환자적완전완해솔.용SPSS 13.0연건진행통계학분석,완전완해솔적비교용χ2검험.결과 완전반응조、부분반응조화무반응조적림상완전완해솔분별위88.5%(23/26)、73.3%(11/15)화8.3%(1/12),3조간차이유통계학의의(χ2=23.548,P=0.000).완전반응조、부분반응조적완전완해솔고우무반응조(χ2=22.656,P=0.000화χ2=11.407,P=0.001).결론 DLBCL환자화료중기18F-FDG PET/CT현상유조우예측기화료료효.
Objective To explore the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT on the assessment of chemotherapy response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed before and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy( R-CHOP or CHOP protocol) in 53 patients with DLBCL. The patients were divided into 3 groups: complete response group, partial response group and no response group. The therapeutic response was assessed by comparing post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT with pre-treatment PET/CT. Complete remission (CR) rate at the end of chemotherapy was calculated. χ2 test was performed with software SPSS 13.0. Results CR rates of complete response group, partially response group and no response group were 88.5% (23/26), 73.3% (11/15) and 8.3% (1/12), respectively (χ2=23.548, P=0.000). CR rates of the complete and partially response groups were significantly higher than those of no response group (χ2=22.656, P=0.000; χ2=11.407, P=0.001). Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT may be useful for the assessment of chemotherapy response in DLBCL.