中国急救医学
中國急救醫學
중국급구의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2009年
12期
1077-1080
,共4页
王炎%胡斌%曾晓春%李浪%宁耀贵%朱川萌
王炎%鬍斌%曾曉春%李浪%寧耀貴%硃川萌
왕염%호빈%증효춘%리랑%저요귀%주천맹
锁骨下静脉%穿刺%放射学%解剖学
鎖骨下靜脈%穿刺%放射學%解剖學
쇄골하정맥%천자%방사학%해부학
Subclavian vein%Cannulation%Radiology%Anatomy
目的 采用放射解剖学方法探讨锁骨下静脉穿刺(锁骨下径路)的新定位标志和方法.方法 85例患者行相关标志的放射解剖学和实际体表测量,进行校正、比较和分析,提出新的定位标志.采用区组随机法,8位初学者分别采用新方法和传统方法共穿刺168例患者,比较其穿刺成功率.结果 A点(胸锁乳突肌锁骨头外缘与锁骨下缘交点)、B点(喙突-体表中线距离的中线与锁骨下缘交点)、C点(胸大肌三角肌顶点-体表正中线距离中点处的锁骨下缘)离锁骨下静脉与锁骨下缘交点(D点)解剖距离近;初学者采用新方法成功率显著提高(P=0.009),穿刺时间显著减少 (P=0.001).结论 A点、B点和C点可作为锁骨下静脉穿刺的定位参考,初学者采用新定位标志和方法可显著提高穿刺成功率,减少穿刺时间.
目的 採用放射解剖學方法探討鎖骨下靜脈穿刺(鎖骨下徑路)的新定位標誌和方法.方法 85例患者行相關標誌的放射解剖學和實際體錶測量,進行校正、比較和分析,提齣新的定位標誌.採用區組隨機法,8位初學者分彆採用新方法和傳統方法共穿刺168例患者,比較其穿刺成功率.結果 A點(胸鎖乳突肌鎖骨頭外緣與鎖骨下緣交點)、B點(喙突-體錶中線距離的中線與鎖骨下緣交點)、C點(胸大肌三角肌頂點-體錶正中線距離中點處的鎖骨下緣)離鎖骨下靜脈與鎖骨下緣交點(D點)解剖距離近;初學者採用新方法成功率顯著提高(P=0.009),穿刺時間顯著減少 (P=0.001).結論 A點、B點和C點可作為鎖骨下靜脈穿刺的定位參攷,初學者採用新定位標誌和方法可顯著提高穿刺成功率,減少穿刺時間.
목적 채용방사해부학방법탐토쇄골하정맥천자(쇄골하경로)적신정위표지화방법.방법 85례환자행상관표지적방사해부학화실제체표측량,진행교정、비교화분석,제출신적정위표지.채용구조수궤법,8위초학자분별채용신방법화전통방법공천자168례환자,비교기천자성공솔.결과 A점(흉쇄유돌기쇄골두외연여쇄골하연교점)、B점(훼돌-체표중선거리적중선여쇄골하연교점)、C점(흉대기삼각기정점-체표정중선거리중점처적쇄골하연)리쇄골하정맥여쇄골하연교점(D점)해부거리근;초학자채용신방법성공솔현저제고(P=0.009),천자시간현저감소 (P=0.001).결론 A점、B점화C점가작위쇄골하정맥천자적정위삼고,초학자채용신정위표지화방법가현저제고천자성공솔,감소천자시간.
Objective To investigate the novel and optimal landmarks for a subclavian vein cannulation (SVCA). Methods We conducted the study including three phases: ①Various possible markers for SVCA were evaluated by anatomic measurements in vivo and the course of SV was evaluated by radiologic means; Results acquired by the two means were compared and adjusted, then the novel landmarks and a new approach for SVCA were proposed. ③The efficacy of the new approach for SVCA was compared with that of traditional one by a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Results Point A (the junction of the lateral border of sternocleidomastoideus clavicular head and inferior border of clavicle), point B (a point on the lower border of clavicle just above the middle of the line joining the coracoid process and midline of the body), and point C (a point on the lower border of clavicle above the middle of line joining the apex of the cleft formed by ectopectoralis and deltoid muscles and midline of the body) were relatively close to point D (where subclavian vein crosses the inferior border of clavicle). The novel approach had significantly higher success rate (80.9% vs.70.2%,P=0.008); the time of cannulation by new method was significant shorter than that by a traditional one [(5.9±6.8) minutes vs.(10.4±2.5) minutes, P=0.001]. Conclusion Point A, B, and C could be considered as landmarks for identifying puncture site for SVCA. The novel approach applied in the beginners for SVCA could significantly reduce operation time and increase success rate.