中国医学影像技术
中國醫學影像技術
중국의학영상기술
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
2009年
7期
1258-1261
,共4页
张春燕%任转琴%孙洪跃%王霄英%蒋学祥
張春燕%任轉琴%孫洪躍%王霄英%蔣學祥
장춘연%임전금%손홍약%왕소영%장학상
磁共振成像%放射性核素显像%骨肿瘤%肿瘤转移
磁共振成像%放射性覈素顯像%骨腫瘤%腫瘤轉移
자공진성상%방사성핵소현상%골종류%종류전이
Magnetic resonance imaging%Radionuclide imaging%Bone neoplasms%Neoplasm metastasis
目的 评价大范围扩散加权成像(DWI)在恶性肿瘤骨转移瘤检测中的应用.方法 18例手术证实的各种恶性肿瘤患者纳入本研究.所有患者均在1个月内同时接受大范围DWI检查和99mTc-MDP骨扫描检查. 结果 18例患者中,15例经常规MRI证实存在骨转移瘤,其中7例为多发骨转移瘤(>10处),另8例共证实23处转移瘤;余3例未见转移瘤.除外7例全身多发骨转移瘤(>10处)患者,对其余11例有(8例)或无(3例)骨转移瘤患者计数病灶数,以患者为单位计算的大范围DWI和骨扫描诊断骨转移瘤的敏感性均为100%,特异性分别为100%、33.33%;曲线下面积分别为1.00和0.67,差异有统计学意义(P=0.04).以病灶为单位计算的大范围DWI和骨扫描诊断骨转移瘤灶的敏感性分别为86.96%、78.26%,特异性均为60.00%;曲线下面积分别为0.74和0.69,差异无统计学意义. 结论 大范围DWI可用于恶性肿瘤骨转移瘤的筛查.
目的 評價大範圍擴散加權成像(DWI)在噁性腫瘤骨轉移瘤檢測中的應用.方法 18例手術證實的各種噁性腫瘤患者納入本研究.所有患者均在1箇月內同時接受大範圍DWI檢查和99mTc-MDP骨掃描檢查. 結果 18例患者中,15例經常規MRI證實存在骨轉移瘤,其中7例為多髮骨轉移瘤(>10處),另8例共證實23處轉移瘤;餘3例未見轉移瘤.除外7例全身多髮骨轉移瘤(>10處)患者,對其餘11例有(8例)或無(3例)骨轉移瘤患者計數病竈數,以患者為單位計算的大範圍DWI和骨掃描診斷骨轉移瘤的敏感性均為100%,特異性分彆為100%、33.33%;麯線下麵積分彆為1.00和0.67,差異有統計學意義(P=0.04).以病竈為單位計算的大範圍DWI和骨掃描診斷骨轉移瘤竈的敏感性分彆為86.96%、78.26%,特異性均為60.00%;麯線下麵積分彆為0.74和0.69,差異無統計學意義. 結論 大範圍DWI可用于噁性腫瘤骨轉移瘤的篩查.
목적 평개대범위확산가권성상(DWI)재악성종류골전이류검측중적응용.방법 18례수술증실적각충악성종류환자납입본연구.소유환자균재1개월내동시접수대범위DWI검사화99mTc-MDP골소묘검사. 결과 18례환자중,15례경상규MRI증실존재골전이류,기중7례위다발골전이류(>10처),령8례공증실23처전이류;여3례미견전이류.제외7례전신다발골전이류(>10처)환자,대기여11례유(8례)혹무(3례)골전이류환자계수병조수,이환자위단위계산적대범위DWI화골소묘진단골전이류적민감성균위100%,특이성분별위100%、33.33%;곡선하면적분별위1.00화0.67,차이유통계학의의(P=0.04).이병조위단위계산적대범위DWI화골소묘진단골전이류조적민감성분별위86.96%、78.26%,특이성균위60.00%;곡선하면적분별위0.74화0.69,차이무통계학의의. 결론 대범위DWI가용우악성종류골전이류적사사.
Objective To evaluate large field diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detection of bone metastases of malignant tumors. Methods Eighteen patients with various malignant tumors were enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent large field DWI and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy within one month. Results Fifteen of 18 patients were diagnosed as bone metastases with conventional MRI; 7 of them were found more than 10 bone metastases, and 23 bone metastases were confirmed in the other 8 patients. When seven patients with multiple bone metastases (>10) were excluded, and lesions in the residual 11 patients with or without bone metastases were counted, the diagnostic sensitivity of bone metastases with large field DWI and bone scintigraphy was both 100%, and specificity were 100% and 33.33%, respectively. ROC study showed the area under curve (AUC) of large field DWI and bone scintigraphy were 1.00 and 0.67, respectively (P=0.04). With lesion numbers as study unit, the diagnostic sensitivity of large field DWI and bone scintigraphy were 86.96% and 78.26%, and the specificity was both 60.00%. ROC study showed the AUC of large field DWI and bone scintigraphy was 0.74, 0.69, respectively; and no statistical difference was found. Conclusion Large field DWI can be used in screening the bone metastases of malignant tumors.